Try answering a question instead of posting the same crap and links over and over.
Obviously you live for this .....otherwise you wouldn't have made an alias when you were banned before as GBP. ..............Yet you have never talked sports on a Sports Forum......Try answering that.
Try answering a question instead of posting the same crap and links over and over.
Obviously you live for this .....otherwise you wouldn't have made an alias when you were banned before as GBP. ..............Yet you have never talked sports on a Sports Forum......Try answering that.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
NIST conducted
an extremely
thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a
number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.
Some 200 technical experts
—including about 85 career NIST experts
and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia
—reviewed tens of thousands of documents,
interviewed more than 1,000 people,
reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage
and 7,000 photographs,
analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage
, performed laboratory tests,
and
created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they
began to collapse.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
NIST conducted
an extremely
thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a
number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.
Some 200 technical experts
—including about 85 career NIST experts
and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia
—reviewed tens of thousands of documents,
interviewed more than 1,000 people,
reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage
and 7,000 photographs,
analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage
, performed laboratory tests,
and
created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they
began to collapse.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
can you provide a link to an official government website where there is a statement declaring 84 unreleased Pentagon videos
alternatively
could you provide a link to a quality USA newspaper for a news release
and story on unreleased 84 tapes. A link to the Washington Post, USA
Today, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, etc so that we can read about that non release of those tapes.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
can you provide a link to an official government website where there is a statement declaring 84 unreleased Pentagon videos
alternatively
could you provide a link to a quality USA newspaper for a news release
and story on unreleased 84 tapes. A link to the Washington Post, USA
Today, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, etc so that we can read about that non release of those tapes.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
Did you actually watch that video link you posted of him
This is how he talks
"all they do( the Government) is write crap on a piece of paper. They don't have balls or guts"
You prefer the words of this YOB to President Obama.
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
Did you actually watch that video link you posted of him
This is how he talks
"all they do( the Government) is write crap on a piece of paper. They don't have balls or guts"
You prefer the words of this YOB to President Obama.
Shortly after the season two episode "Police State" aired, U.S. Representative Steve Cohen from Tennessee, who was interviewed in the episode, called for the removal of this program from truTV's lineup. He called the episode "outrageous distortion and an outright lie," as well as "dangerous and irresponsible." He stated "when the media purposely distort the facts to create confusion and mislead people, they must be held accountable. Unless we actively debunk false and misleading reports, we risk leaving the public with a dangerously skewed vision of this country." Cohen said he was "shocked and appalled" that Time Warner would air a program "so full of inaccuracies and irresponsible distortions."
The "Police State" episode investigates allegations that various prison-like facilities built around the country that are operated by FEMA will be used during martial law for the internment of citizens who are deemed a threat to national security. However, officials have stated the facilities are emergency FEMA camps for the housing of civilians displaced by hurricanes or other natural disasters.[9] Cohen, whose district covers most of Memphis, created legislation aimed at creating temporary FEMA camps for the housing of people affected by any earthquake that could occur in the area.
Another allegation that focused around a private facility outside Covington, Georgia, was the stockpiling of thousands of plastic bins alleged to be used for mass burials. The company that runs it is Vantage Products, the country's largest manufacturer of grave liners, and the facility is their storage site.
In a response to the criticism, Misty Skedgell, a Turner spokesperson, described Conspiracy Theory as an "entertainment program that appears on an entertainment network."
Shortly after the season two episode "Police State" aired, U.S. Representative Steve Cohen from Tennessee, who was interviewed in the episode, called for the removal of this program from truTV's lineup. He called the episode "outrageous distortion and an outright lie," as well as "dangerous and irresponsible." He stated "when the media purposely distort the facts to create confusion and mislead people, they must be held accountable. Unless we actively debunk false and misleading reports, we risk leaving the public with a dangerously skewed vision of this country." Cohen said he was "shocked and appalled" that Time Warner would air a program "so full of inaccuracies and irresponsible distortions."
The "Police State" episode investigates allegations that various prison-like facilities built around the country that are operated by FEMA will be used during martial law for the internment of citizens who are deemed a threat to national security. However, officials have stated the facilities are emergency FEMA camps for the housing of civilians displaced by hurricanes or other natural disasters.[9] Cohen, whose district covers most of Memphis, created legislation aimed at creating temporary FEMA camps for the housing of people affected by any earthquake that could occur in the area.
Another allegation that focused around a private facility outside Covington, Georgia, was the stockpiling of thousands of plastic bins alleged to be used for mass burials. The company that runs it is Vantage Products, the country's largest manufacturer of grave liners, and the facility is their storage site.
In a response to the criticism, Misty Skedgell, a Turner spokesperson, described Conspiracy Theory as an "entertainment program that appears on an entertainment network."
Jesse Ventura's 9/11 theory: Dick Cheney "allowed it to happen to further their agenda"
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura was a guest on "Piers Morgan Tonight" this evening, and gave his theory on what happened on 9/11. "I believe Dick Cheney knew it," said Ventura. "It's not rational" countered Piers Morgan.
"They allowed it to happen to further their agenda in the Middle East," said Ventura –
Jesse Ventura's 9/11 theory: Dick Cheney "allowed it to happen to further their agenda"
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura was a guest on "Piers Morgan Tonight" this evening, and gave his theory on what happened on 9/11. "I believe Dick Cheney knew it," said Ventura. "It's not rational" countered Piers Morgan.
"They allowed it to happen to further their agenda in the Middle East," said Ventura –
once a conspiracy believer, always a conspiracy believer
go from conspiracy to conspiracy Jesse Ventura, keep raking in the dollars, a great money spinner
In a November 1999 Playboy interview, the savvy governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura, was asked, "Who do you think killed President Kennedy?" He replied , The military-industrial complex. I believe Kennedy was going to withdraw us from Vietnam and there were fractions that didn't want that"
once a conspiracy believer, always a conspiracy believer
go from conspiracy to conspiracy Jesse Ventura, keep raking in the dollars, a great money spinner
In a November 1999 Playboy interview, the savvy governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura, was asked, "Who do you think killed President Kennedy?" He replied , The military-industrial complex. I believe Kennedy was going to withdraw us from Vietnam and there were fractions that didn't want that"
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
Brent Blanchard Demolition Expert
The following is a transcript of implosionworld.com's "A History of Structural Demolition in America", which was presented at the 28th Annual International Society of Explosives Engineers Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada on February 11th, 2002:
"Good Morning, my name is Brent Blanchard, and I serve as Operations Manager for Protec Documentation Services in Rancocas Woods, New Jersey.
The name of this paper is A HISTORY OF EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION IN AMERICA
Just a few things before I begin: This paper has taken several years to research, and its full length is over 10,000 words. Obviously that would take a lot longer than my alotted time to present. Therefore many sections have been condensed considerably, and some supporting comments have been eliminated altogether.
That being said, there are still certain points that are critical to understanding the evolution of the industry - and to showing you the depth of our research - so we will cover some subjects in more detail than others.
And although most of you know the history behind nitroglycerin, dynamite and other explosives, I have left a little of that in here for the benefit of those who don't.
The bottom line; if I gloss over something you would like to know more about or discuss in more detail, please see me after the presentation."
#
Please do not deceive or mislead
Brent Blanchard is an expert on buildings demolition and has written peer review papers.
Jessie Ventura is NOT an expert on buildings demolition. Period
1.
Andrew Maxwell is a fuckin moron. I wonder if he even has read a book
before. The kids are all stupid and they asked all the wrong questions. I
think that movie was scripted. No way, people could be that stupid and
gullible. It’s very sad to see what our governments public education
system has done to people. I’m grateful to have post secondary
education. I felt like they all had 3rd grade education. It gave all the
actual college grads, THOUSANDS of physicists, scientists, engineers,
architects, police officers, firefighters, medical professionals, and
military officers, veterans and the 911 family members that disagree and
dispute the 911-commission report a bad name. If what the government
says is fact…how can facts be disputed by these people? You can’t
dispute fact but for some reason these people seem to?
2. The
one guy in the movie is just a flight instructor and Captain Aimer is a
retired professional pilot with 45 years airline experience and over
250 pilots and aviation professionals and don’t believe the 9/11
Commission Report. NO one disputed the WTC towers, it's the pentagon
strike that was impossible. 250 pilots say it was impossible for Hani
Hanjour to strike the pentagon using the actual 911-commission report.
3. The
demolition engineer expert in the movie has already been debunked and
Jesse Ventura was an actual navy seal demolition expert. He already used
his demolition expertise to explain how it was done.
5. No
one asks why the steel from the WTC buildings was quickly removed from
the crime scene and shipped overseas before it could be analyzed for
evidence of explosives. Why was all the evidence destroyed in a week and
who destroys a crime scene?
6. The
pentagon expert in the movie supported bush, cheney, and rumsfeld?
You’ve got to be fucking kidding me? An actual pentagon soldier that was
in the direct impact of the crash and came out of the HOLE and saw NO
plane.
7. Why
did President Bush and Vice President Cheney did ultimately agree to
testify under several conditions: They would be allowed to testify
jointly. They would not be required to take an oath before testifying.
The testimony would not be recorded electronically or transcribed, and
that the only record would be notes taken by one of the commission
staffers. These notes would not be made public? Why?
8. The
Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack, Videos Outside the
Pentagon Seized, and Lawsuits to Obtain Videos. Why doesn’t the
government release all the videos that we know exist via the freedom of
information act? I’d like the 84 tapes but I will settle for the tapes
the American people own and that’s the 10 pentagon surveillance tapes.
I’ve said this 10 damn times on covers? Why is it that 911 believers
don’t want to see a plane crash it to the pentagon? How come you dumb
ass indoctrinated sheep don’t want proof?
Brent Blanchard Demolition Expert
The following is a transcript of implosionworld.com's "A History of Structural Demolition in America", which was presented at the 28th Annual International Society of Explosives Engineers Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada on February 11th, 2002:
"Good Morning, my name is Brent Blanchard, and I serve as Operations Manager for Protec Documentation Services in Rancocas Woods, New Jersey.
The name of this paper is A HISTORY OF EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION IN AMERICA
Just a few things before I begin: This paper has taken several years to research, and its full length is over 10,000 words. Obviously that would take a lot longer than my alotted time to present. Therefore many sections have been condensed considerably, and some supporting comments have been eliminated altogether.
That being said, there are still certain points that are critical to understanding the evolution of the industry - and to showing you the depth of our research - so we will cover some subjects in more detail than others.
And although most of you know the history behind nitroglycerin, dynamite and other explosives, I have left a little of that in here for the benefit of those who don't.
The bottom line; if I gloss over something you would like to know more about or discuss in more detail, please see me after the presentation."
#
Please do not deceive or mislead
Brent Blanchard is an expert on buildings demolition and has written peer review papers.
Jessie Ventura is NOT an expert on buildings demolition. Period
Profile: Brent Blanchard Brent Blanchard was a participant or observer in the following events: August 8, 2006: No Explosives Used in WTC Collapse, Says Demolition Industry Leader Edit event
Brent Blanchard, a leading professional and writer in the controlled demolition industry, publishes a 12-page report that says it refutes claims that the World Trade Center was destroyed with explosives. The report is published on ImplosionWorld.com, a demolition industry website edited by Blanchard. Blanchard is also director of field operations for Protec Documentation Services, Inc., a company specializing in monitoring construction-related demolitions. In his report, Blanchard says that Protec had portable field seismographs in “several sites in Manhattan and Brooklyn” on 9/11. He says they did not show the “spikes” that would have been caused by explosions in the towers. Blanchard also takes aim at the claim that Building 7 of the WTC was demolished, writing: “Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00 pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 within a few hundred feet of the event. We have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in demolition, and all reported hearing or seeing nothing to indicate an explosive detonation precipitating the collapse.”
Profile: Brent Blanchard Brent Blanchard was a participant or observer in the following events: August 8, 2006: No Explosives Used in WTC Collapse, Says Demolition Industry Leader Edit event
Brent Blanchard, a leading professional and writer in the controlled demolition industry, publishes a 12-page report that says it refutes claims that the World Trade Center was destroyed with explosives. The report is published on ImplosionWorld.com, a demolition industry website edited by Blanchard. Blanchard is also director of field operations for Protec Documentation Services, Inc., a company specializing in monitoring construction-related demolitions. In his report, Blanchard says that Protec had portable field seismographs in “several sites in Manhattan and Brooklyn” on 9/11. He says they did not show the “spikes” that would have been caused by explosions in the towers. Blanchard also takes aim at the claim that Building 7 of the WTC was demolished, writing: “Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00 pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 within a few hundred feet of the event. We have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in demolition, and all reported hearing or seeing nothing to indicate an explosive detonation precipitating the collapse.”
If you had watched the video, Brent Blanchard is demonstrating what would be required to demolish buildings, who can you debunk how an expert is showing how columns have to be exposed and drilled etc and explains the actual work that needs to be done, who can you debunk that
video expert explains what is required to set charges throughout a building
If you watched the video, he was asked
Q if Dr Evil wahted to rig and blow these buildings how would he do it
A he takes them to the new ground zero building and shows them columns, he says you cant just stick explosives on, you have to cut into the column to lay high velocity explosives that cut through steel, a lot of preparation for each column . In the twin towers you would have had to repeated this to hundreds of columns , a lot of explosive material, a lot of people who know exactly what to do,who had a lot time,guys come in precut the girders and wire the whole building ,and this had to take place under the nose of everyone working in the buildings
If you had watched the video, Brent Blanchard is demonstrating what would be required to demolish buildings, who can you debunk how an expert is showing how columns have to be exposed and drilled etc and explains the actual work that needs to be done, who can you debunk that
video expert explains what is required to set charges throughout a building
If you watched the video, he was asked
Q if Dr Evil wahted to rig and blow these buildings how would he do it
A he takes them to the new ground zero building and shows them columns, he says you cant just stick explosives on, you have to cut into the column to lay high velocity explosives that cut through steel, a lot of preparation for each column . In the twin towers you would have had to repeated this to hundreds of columns , a lot of explosive material, a lot of people who know exactly what to do,who had a lot time,guys come in precut the girders and wire the whole building ,and this had to take place under the nose of everyone working in the buildings
"Kapono, I can tell you are an educated man. I can take that if you’re
not sure what to believe. However, to be like Hutch ‘em all and BMA and
just be completely indoctrinated by the government is pathetic. How can
you blindly ignore some of the gaping holes in the narratives told by
the government? On top of that, imagine if you had a family member die
that day. You get an interview with the FBI and you ask questions and
about 75 percent of the answers they gave you… were I’m not of liberty
to say, I don’t have an answer for you, and it’s a matter of national
security? Keep in mind that people’s family members were killed and
you’re getting fuck off? That’s some questionable callous bullshit. The
911 commission, US military, FBI, CIA, NIST, DOD, and Bush and Cheney
all act suspicious and guilty."
I appreciate the compliment, and I will admit that I do not know 100% what happened. No one can really say they did unless they had first hand knowledge, interaction, and experience with the events that day. That being said, knowing what I know about radical / political Islam and the Jidahist belief system they advocate, it does not surprise me one bit that this foreign non-state actor organization would organize the type of catastrophic event that they did. Because the government's story is "al-Qaeda was responsible for this event", and knowing what I know about al-Qaeda, its history, its ideology, etc., that is the most plausible and likely explanation in my mind, from an objective perspective. Is it possible I am wrong? Absolutely its possible. I wasn't there, didn't have first hand knowledge. But not many people did, and the most likely explanation for 9/11 is not a grand government conspiracy, but instead is that al-Qaeda was behind the attack.
Oh, and to say that I am completely indoctrinated by the government because I believe the fact that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks is attempting to slight the objective reasons I have for falling on that side of the fence. Like yourself, I'm a huge JRE fan, so I'm more than willing to question things and examine things objectively. That being said, after my examination, I'm led to the conclusion that the "official story" is more likely than not the accurate, correct story.
"Kapono, I can tell you are an educated man. I can take that if you’re
not sure what to believe. However, to be like Hutch ‘em all and BMA and
just be completely indoctrinated by the government is pathetic. How can
you blindly ignore some of the gaping holes in the narratives told by
the government? On top of that, imagine if you had a family member die
that day. You get an interview with the FBI and you ask questions and
about 75 percent of the answers they gave you… were I’m not of liberty
to say, I don’t have an answer for you, and it’s a matter of national
security? Keep in mind that people’s family members were killed and
you’re getting fuck off? That’s some questionable callous bullshit. The
911 commission, US military, FBI, CIA, NIST, DOD, and Bush and Cheney
all act suspicious and guilty."
I appreciate the compliment, and I will admit that I do not know 100% what happened. No one can really say they did unless they had first hand knowledge, interaction, and experience with the events that day. That being said, knowing what I know about radical / political Islam and the Jidahist belief system they advocate, it does not surprise me one bit that this foreign non-state actor organization would organize the type of catastrophic event that they did. Because the government's story is "al-Qaeda was responsible for this event", and knowing what I know about al-Qaeda, its history, its ideology, etc., that is the most plausible and likely explanation in my mind, from an objective perspective. Is it possible I am wrong? Absolutely its possible. I wasn't there, didn't have first hand knowledge. But not many people did, and the most likely explanation for 9/11 is not a grand government conspiracy, but instead is that al-Qaeda was behind the attack.
Oh, and to say that I am completely indoctrinated by the government because I believe the fact that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks is attempting to slight the objective reasons I have for falling on that side of the fence. Like yourself, I'm a huge JRE fan, so I'm more than willing to question things and examine things objectively. That being said, after my examination, I'm led to the conclusion that the "official story" is more likely than not the accurate, correct story.
"Watch these documentaries, read, and click on everything on post 377 and 372."
You can stop linking to youtube videos as evidence for me, SRH. The most easily manipulable form of media is the video format. The fact that some videos are set to music, use pictures and quotes out of context, etc. is not persuasive in my mind. This is not a slight to you, but these videos are made to manipulate the viewer on an emotional level and can be edited to support a specific viewpoint. I guarantee you that none of the videos you have linked today could be considered "objective" discussions of the events -- their authors have their minds made up (that the government story is BS) and slant their videos accordingly.
"Watch these documentaries, read, and click on everything on post 377 and 372."
You can stop linking to youtube videos as evidence for me, SRH. The most easily manipulable form of media is the video format. The fact that some videos are set to music, use pictures and quotes out of context, etc. is not persuasive in my mind. This is not a slight to you, but these videos are made to manipulate the viewer on an emotional level and can be edited to support a specific viewpoint. I guarantee you that none of the videos you have linked today could be considered "objective" discussions of the events -- their authors have their minds made up (that the government story is BS) and slant their videos accordingly.
"And after reading and watching everything. Man, go search for more
info yourself. Sit back and think about all of the lies the government
has told us. I started out 100 percent on the governments’ side when I
was in school. A couple of degrees later…I started to see that my
government has been lying to me since kindergarten and now I’m 50/50 on
everything anyone tells me."
I don't necessarily like the implications that I have not searched for more info myself. When 9/11 happened, I dove headfirst into the study of the Middle East, its history, its politics, Islam as a religion, the development of political Islam and Jihadist doctrine (hint: did you know that the current strains of radical Islam largely started with the Wahhabists, who made an alliance with the House of Saud prior to the formation of Saudi Arabia as a state?). When all this conspiracy stuff started gaining traction, I dug into that as well. My opinion is not based on swallowing whatever the government tells me. I am not that stupid. BUT -- just because the government has lied to its people in the past does not mean, ipso facto, that it is doing it on this occasion. My objective examination of the evidence leads me to the conclusion that it is not, and that this was a plan orchestrated and carried about by al-Qaeda and nothing more.
BTW -- I have a few degrees as well. I bet Hutch does too. Mere education does not mean you are the sole authority on the subject.
"And after reading and watching everything. Man, go search for more
info yourself. Sit back and think about all of the lies the government
has told us. I started out 100 percent on the governments’ side when I
was in school. A couple of degrees later…I started to see that my
government has been lying to me since kindergarten and now I’m 50/50 on
everything anyone tells me."
I don't necessarily like the implications that I have not searched for more info myself. When 9/11 happened, I dove headfirst into the study of the Middle East, its history, its politics, Islam as a religion, the development of political Islam and Jihadist doctrine (hint: did you know that the current strains of radical Islam largely started with the Wahhabists, who made an alliance with the House of Saud prior to the formation of Saudi Arabia as a state?). When all this conspiracy stuff started gaining traction, I dug into that as well. My opinion is not based on swallowing whatever the government tells me. I am not that stupid. BUT -- just because the government has lied to its people in the past does not mean, ipso facto, that it is doing it on this occasion. My objective examination of the evidence leads me to the conclusion that it is not, and that this was a plan orchestrated and carried about by al-Qaeda and nothing more.
BTW -- I have a few degrees as well. I bet Hutch does too. Mere education does not mean you are the sole authority on the subject.
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
"Kapono, I can tell you are an educated man. I can take that if you’re
not sure what to believe. However, to be like Hutch ‘em all and BMA and
just be completely indoctrinated by the government is pathetic. How can
you blindly ignore some of the gaping holes in the narratives told by
the government? On top of that, imagine if you had a family member die
that day. You get an interview with the FBI and you ask questions and
about 75 percent of the answers they gave you… were I’m not of liberty
to say, I don’t have an answer for you, and it’s a matter of national
security? Keep in mind that people’s family members were killed and
you’re getting fuck off? That’s some questionable callous bullshit. The
911 commission, US military, FBI, CIA, NIST, DOD, and Bush and Cheney
all act suspicious and guilty."
I appreciate the compliment, and I will admit that I do not know 100% what happened. No one can really say they did unless they had first hand knowledge, interaction, and experience with the events that day. That being said, knowing what I know about radical / political Islam and the Jidahist belief system they advocate, it does not surprise me one bit that this foreign non-state actor organization would organize the type of catastrophic event that they did. Because the government's story is "al-Qaeda was responsible for this event", and knowing what I know about al-Qaeda, its history, its ideology, etc., that is the most plausible and likely explanation in my mind, from an objective perspective. Is it possible I am wrong? Absolutely its possible. I wasn't there, didn't have first hand knowledge. But not many people did, and the most likely explanation for 9/11 is not a grand government conspiracy, but instead is that al-Qaeda was behind the attack.
Oh, and to say that I am completely indoctrinated by the government because I believe the fact that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks is attempting to slight the objective reasons I have for falling on that side of the fence. Like yourself, I'm a huge JRE fan, so I'm more than willing to question things and examine things objectively. That being said, after my examination, I'm led to the conclusion that the "official story" is more likely than not the accurate, correct story.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
"Kapono, I can tell you are an educated man. I can take that if you’re
not sure what to believe. However, to be like Hutch ‘em all and BMA and
just be completely indoctrinated by the government is pathetic. How can
you blindly ignore some of the gaping holes in the narratives told by
the government? On top of that, imagine if you had a family member die
that day. You get an interview with the FBI and you ask questions and
about 75 percent of the answers they gave you… were I’m not of liberty
to say, I don’t have an answer for you, and it’s a matter of national
security? Keep in mind that people’s family members were killed and
you’re getting fuck off? That’s some questionable callous bullshit. The
911 commission, US military, FBI, CIA, NIST, DOD, and Bush and Cheney
all act suspicious and guilty."
I appreciate the compliment, and I will admit that I do not know 100% what happened. No one can really say they did unless they had first hand knowledge, interaction, and experience with the events that day. That being said, knowing what I know about radical / political Islam and the Jidahist belief system they advocate, it does not surprise me one bit that this foreign non-state actor organization would organize the type of catastrophic event that they did. Because the government's story is "al-Qaeda was responsible for this event", and knowing what I know about al-Qaeda, its history, its ideology, etc., that is the most plausible and likely explanation in my mind, from an objective perspective. Is it possible I am wrong? Absolutely its possible. I wasn't there, didn't have first hand knowledge. But not many people did, and the most likely explanation for 9/11 is not a grand government conspiracy, but instead is that al-Qaeda was behind the attack.
Oh, and to say that I am completely indoctrinated by the government because I believe the fact that al-Qaeda was behind the attacks is attempting to slight the objective reasons I have for falling on that side of the fence. Like yourself, I'm a huge JRE fan, so I'm more than willing to question things and examine things objectively. That being said, after my examination, I'm led to the conclusion that the "official story" is more likely than not the accurate, correct story.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
the media
If you please a speech by the President Of The United States
Listen, carefully and learn. The man in charge of the most powerful office in the world and who has nothing to gain by supporting George Bush .
This is what he said
President Obama Speaks to the Muslim World from Cairo, Egypt
June 5, 2009
And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.
The
situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to
work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda
and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by
choice, we went because of necessity. I am aware that some question or
justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.
The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda
chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack,
and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They
have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
the media
If you please a speech by the President Of The United States
Listen, carefully and learn. The man in charge of the most powerful office in the world and who has nothing to gain by supporting George Bush .
This is what he said
President Obama Speaks to the Muslim World from Cairo, Egypt
June 5, 2009
And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.
The
situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to
work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda
and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by
choice, we went because of necessity. I am aware that some question or
justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.
The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda
chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack,
and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They
have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted?
_________________
I believe more than ever that the government wasn't involved after reading all the things you posted.
Doesn't mean I believe everything the government has said about 9/11.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted?
_________________
I believe more than ever that the government wasn't involved after reading all the things you posted.
Doesn't mean I believe everything the government has said about 9/11.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
no
President Bush President Obama President Clinton
all missed your fantastic videos all missed your demolition expert Jessie Ventura
they are totally unaware of conspiracy theories or are they
Obama speaks to BBC Persian , immediately at the beginning of the interview
#
the President says that it is "hateful" and "offensive" to say the US
government was behind the 9/11 attacks.
Former President Bill Clinton responded aggressively when
his speech at a fundraiser for his wife's campaign was interrupted by
9/11 conspiracy protesters.
"A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, responding to one of
the hecklers as the audience cheered. "I'll be glad to talk to you if
you shut up and let me talk." Another protester yelled that the attacks
were an "inside job."
"An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside
job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to
give Minnesota a bad reputation."
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
no
President Bush President Obama President Clinton
all missed your fantastic videos all missed your demolition expert Jessie Ventura
they are totally unaware of conspiracy theories or are they
Obama speaks to BBC Persian , immediately at the beginning of the interview
#
the President says that it is "hateful" and "offensive" to say the US
government was behind the 9/11 attacks.
Former President Bill Clinton responded aggressively when
his speech at a fundraiser for his wife's campaign was interrupted by
9/11 conspiracy protesters.
"A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, responding to one of
the hecklers as the audience cheered. "I'll be glad to talk to you if
you shut up and let me talk." Another protester yelled that the attacks
were an "inside job."
"An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside
job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to
give Minnesota a bad reputation."
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
reports that count
There is simply no comparison NIST conducted
an extremely
thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a
number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.
Some 200 technical experts
—including about 85 career NIST experts
and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia
—reviewed tens of thousands of documents,
interviewed more than 1,000 people,
reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage
and 7,000 photographs,
analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage
, performed laboratory tests,
and
created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they
began to collapse.
Kapono my problem with your statements is that there are way too many loop holes. You believe the governments account even after seeing everything I posted? I shake my head at that. I can’t believe anyone with your education could see all 14 things I posted and still come to the conclusion that what the government said was 100 percent true? That’s like walking in on my wife and seeing love letters, flowers, candy, music, liquor, a bra, panties, condom wrapper, clothes all over the floor, the smell of sex in the air, a door slamming, and thinking nothing suspicious happened.
reports that count
There is simply no comparison NIST conducted
an extremely
thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a
number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.
Some 200 technical experts
—including about 85 career NIST experts
and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia
—reviewed tens of thousands of documents,
interviewed more than 1,000 people,
reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage
and 7,000 photographs,
analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage
, performed laboratory tests,
and
created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events
that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they
began to collapse.
Why was Capt. Burlingame, a retired Military Officer with training in anti-terrorism, reported to have given up his airplane to a skinny small malnourished nothing Hani Hanjour holding a "boxcutter"?
_____________________________
Did he give up or was Captain Burlingame murdered? Who reported that he gave up? Was he the willing participant in the government's effort to sell the invasion of Iraq to America--so much so that he chose to enter into a suicidal pact? Or was the hijacker bigger than his passport suggests? Or is it implausible that a small dark man from an undeveloped country was able to overpower a big, trained, white man from a Superpower?
Analysis of the Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Accounts suggests that some saw a passenger airliner and some saw a saw a small corporate jet.
_____________________
Some have reportedly seen Big Foot, Yeti, and the Lochness Monster. They recovered the remains of all the passengers. How did those passengers make their way into a small corporate jet before it crashed into the pentagon?
Absent from the public record are photographs or videos of anything like a 757 approaching the Pentagon. WHY?
I've answered this 34 thousand times. PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY: THE TAPES ARE NOT GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND THEY ARE NOT FREE TO RELEASE THEM. THEY ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE COMPANY THAT MADE THEM. SOME TAPES WERE VIEWED IN THE MASSAOUI (SPELLING) TRIAL.
IN ADDITION, EVER HEAR OF THE ZUPRUDER FILM? DO SOME RESEARCH AND FIND OUT WHO GOT SUED AND WHAT IT COST JUST BECAUSE THE FILM WAS RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC.
Why do the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names?
Or possibly he was murdered and they took it from him. There are many eyewitness accounts (from people who were ON THE PLANES....the same people who also eventually were murdered when the planes crashed.....who confirmed that the pilots had been killed. And here you are saying a pilot "gave up his airplane." Do you realize what a disgrace you are to the people who died on that day? It's utterly pathetic.
Answered your question about the tapes more times than I can count. You can't refute my answer yet you keep asking the question. I shouldn't be surprised....that's how you guys work.
Why was Capt. Burlingame, a retired Military Officer with training in anti-terrorism, reported to have given up his airplane to a skinny small malnourished nothing Hani Hanjour holding a "boxcutter"?
_____________________________
Did he give up or was Captain Burlingame murdered? Who reported that he gave up? Was he the willing participant in the government's effort to sell the invasion of Iraq to America--so much so that he chose to enter into a suicidal pact? Or was the hijacker bigger than his passport suggests? Or is it implausible that a small dark man from an undeveloped country was able to overpower a big, trained, white man from a Superpower?
Analysis of the Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Accounts suggests that some saw a passenger airliner and some saw a saw a small corporate jet.
_____________________
Some have reportedly seen Big Foot, Yeti, and the Lochness Monster. They recovered the remains of all the passengers. How did those passengers make their way into a small corporate jet before it crashed into the pentagon?
Absent from the public record are photographs or videos of anything like a 757 approaching the Pentagon. WHY?
I've answered this 34 thousand times. PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY: THE TAPES ARE NOT GOVERNMENT PROPERTY AND THEY ARE NOT FREE TO RELEASE THEM. THEY ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE COMPANY THAT MADE THEM. SOME TAPES WERE VIEWED IN THE MASSAOUI (SPELLING) TRIAL.
IN ADDITION, EVER HEAR OF THE ZUPRUDER FILM? DO SOME RESEARCH AND FIND OUT WHO GOT SUED AND WHAT IT COST JUST BECAUSE THE FILM WAS RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC.
Why do the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names?
Or possibly he was murdered and they took it from him. There are many eyewitness accounts (from people who were ON THE PLANES....the same people who also eventually were murdered when the planes crashed.....who confirmed that the pilots had been killed. And here you are saying a pilot "gave up his airplane." Do you realize what a disgrace you are to the people who died on that day? It's utterly pathetic.
Answered your question about the tapes more times than I can count. You can't refute my answer yet you keep asking the question. I shouldn't be surprised....that's how you guys work.
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
President Obama's speech on Osama bin Laden's death President Obama speaks to the nation on Osama bin Laden's killing by U.S. forces in a compound in Pakistan. May 02, 2011
We quickly learned that the Sept. 11 attacks were carried out by Al
Qaeda — an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which had openly
declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents
in our country and around the globe. And so we went to war against Al
Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends and our allies. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation
against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans
carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No
Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties.
After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his
body.
Hey Kap..don't you think it's a little odd OBL was never officially charged for 9/11?
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden
Any evidence you received is from the media, correct? Therefore if I'm not mistaken it is circumstantial evidence. Otherwise you have no direct evidence al-Qaeda did it. So based on circumstantial evidence you already passed judgement on a group? That's not being objective buddy.
It's strange when the OKC bombing happened, people automatically assumed it was muslims who did it.
When we had the anthrax scare, again people assumed it was the muslims.
We all believed the official story Saddam had WMD..
We all believed the official story Saddam helped OBL...
We all believed we went into war because of 9/11...
The media only portrays muslims to be terrorist...
By now, we all know what happens when people assume too much and believe the official story. Can't blame them, it's difficult for most to realize we're being programmed by the media and Hollywood.
But don't take my word for it...
For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack
the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield
over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists"
and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more
integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller
President Obama's speech on Osama bin Laden's death President Obama speaks to the nation on Osama bin Laden's killing by U.S. forces in a compound in Pakistan. May 02, 2011
We quickly learned that the Sept. 11 attacks were carried out by Al
Qaeda — an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which had openly
declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents
in our country and around the globe. And so we went to war against Al
Qaeda to protect our citizens, our friends and our allies. Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation
against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans
carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No
Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties.
After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his
body.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.