California Sweepstakes Casino Ban Bill Headed to Senate Floor

If it becomes law, A.B. 831 would prohibit operating online sweepstakes that use a “dual currency” model for casino-like wagering.

Geoff Zochodne - Sports Betting Journalist at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst
Aug 29, 2025 • 16:19 ET • 4 min read
Photo By - SIPA. California State Capitol Museum. Photo by Michael Ho Wai Lee / SOPA Images/Sipa USA

The California legislature is one step closer to putting the kibosh on sweepstakes casino gambling in the state. 

Key Takeaways
  • California's Senate Appropriations Committee has advanced A.B. 831, a bill that would ban online sweepstakes casinos.

  • The bill, supported by major gaming tribes and organizations, seeks to enforce penalties on unregulated operators and preserve tribal gaming exclusivity.

  • Yet a few tribal groups, like the Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Indians, oppose the bill.

Assemblymember Avelino Valencia’s A.B. 831 was advanced without commentary on Friday by the California Senate’s Appropriations Committee. The vote to approve the bill was unanimous, 7-0.

The appropriations committee was meeting for a so-called “suspense” hearing, where it quickly disposes of legislation, either nudging it forward for a floor vote or holding it back to die.

A.B. 831, which would ban sweepstakes casinos in California, is moving forward.

Break out the brooms

If it becomes law, A.B. 831 would prohibit operating online sweepstakes that use a “dual currency” model for casino-like wagering, sports betting included. 

The bill would put penalties in place for those who run and offer online sweepstakes casinos, by creating a misdemeanor violation that can result in up to a year of jail time and fines of $1,000 to $25,000 for offenders. 

A.B. 831 was amended in the Senate in June to become an anti-sweeps bill. It was then referred to several committees in the chamber before Friday’s suspense hearing. Now, it must be passed by the Senate and agreed to by the House before it can become law.

There is no guarantee it becomes law, either. The last day for either house of the California legislature to pass bills this year is Sept. 12.

"The fact that any of us vote for an item in committee today does not mean that particular member is necessarily going to vote for the item on the floor," Committee chair Sen. Anna Caballero said, adding that Friday's vote was just a "process vote."

"Many of us may have different opinions by the time it gets to the floor," Caballero said.

Big BFFs

California is not alone in trying to crack down on sweeps. Several other state legislatures have taken action against sweepstakes casinos and sportsbooks this year, such as New Jersey, where anti-sweeps legislation became law earlier this month.

But a California sweepstakes ban would be a bigger blow for operators. That is clear from the opposition voiced by the sweeps industry, as well as the support from California’s major gaming operators, Native American tribes.

A.B. 831 is co-sponsored and supported by groups such as the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation and the California Nations Indian Gaming Association (CNIGA). Those groups have cried foul about sweeps, urging state lawmakers to uphold their exclusive gaming rights in the state.

“The state’s voters have consistently shown their trust in Native American tribes to operate gaming facilities responsibly and ethically,” the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation said in a written argument in favor of the bill. “Allowing unregulated and predatory sweepstakes operators to bypass these regulations undermines that trust and integrity of California’s gaming policies.”

However, a few tribes have come forward to voice their opposition to the proposed sweeps ban, most recently the Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Indians.

“Eliminating legitimate, regulated digital enterprise will only deepen the disparities our people face, erode our tribal self-sufficiency, and contradict California’s stated commitment to equity and inclusion for all tribal nations,” wrote Buffey Bourassa, secretary of the Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Indians, in a letter to the appropriations committee. “We urge the Committee to reject AB 831 and instead support policy solutions that empower all tribes to diversify economically, address systemic challenges, and chart a path toward sustainable self-governance and prosperity.”

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than four years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo