Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
For those who think he can't play - go watch last years sugar bowl. He willed his FCS team to a victory in that game. He's the compete package. Looks off defenders, throws in tiny holes, shuffles in the pocket, strong arm, can run when needed, etc .. Many teams would have taken him in the first round if he was eligible to leave last year.
|
JohnnyClay | 11 |
|
|
They Bengals are choke artists.. This game actually matters so don't expect them to show up.
|
chasingtheline | 21 |
|
|
I hear teasing through 0 is a bad bet. Not that it has ever stopped me! good luck
|
ZangYai_69 | 3 |
|
|
Been hot lately. Maybe I can stay hot and parlay this into a paying gig ;) Don't hate the playa, hate the game.
0-0
+4 Bucs Under 47.5 (NO vs STL) |
RichBlack | 1 |
|
|
TB +4
|
enochmoney | 16 |
|
|
and 1000 miles versus 3000 miles is a huge difference. Brush up on your basic geography fellas. san fran to tampa is 3k.
|
PayAttention6 | 31 |
|
|
I would take your bet in a heartbeat. I see this being a FG game either way. Like someone previously said, 9er's off biggest win of year and traveling across country is never a good combination. Add that to the fact that Tampa has been rolling the last 4 games and played SEATTLE down to a last minute FG at the Hawks field. Tampa is just as physical as Seatlle and SF. After last weeks battle, SF is gonna be sore for this one. Tampa all the way. All signs point to Bucs. Reverse line movement and home dog getting 4. 1 o'clock start for west coast team. I would bet this spot 100 out of 100.
|
PayAttention6 | 31 |
|
|
They met earlier this year and it was 28-20. McCoy and Rivers know they won't win a shoot out so they need to keep manning on the bench with long sustained drives for TD's/bury them deep. The Chargers even admitted that their ball control plan worked but they settled for FG's in the first half and never recovered. I think we'll see a similar score to the game in SD.. I can also see a Denver blow out but 57 is a lot of points. Agree with the UNDER.
|
MHC_5280 | 23 |
|
|
Saints offense VS arguably the worst D in the NFC... Atlanta anemic offense VS Saints stingy defense. The only question heading into this game is whether NO has a letdown looking ahead to a mini break/going to Seattle. There are better games to play this week, this one looks to good to be true.
|
jjames9 | 43 |
|
|
Short week for Pats. Everyone will be on Denver and the line begs Denver action at -2.5 so... Pats will somehow pull it out.
|
ponrock | 10 |
|
|
NIU going for style points just screwed us all.. That'll be their reasoning and I can't blame them, they're trying to get the best possible bowl bid and theoretically keeping hope alive for the impossible.
|
RichBlack | 1 |
|
|
Close, low scoring, defensive slugfest that'll like be determined by turnovers.
|
kwangusbeef | 54 |
|
|
My opinion as a life long Pats fan - As simplified as "Tom Brady doesn't do well against good defensive lines" sounds, it's true. However, Brady and Belichick after a bye are usually dynamite so this will be interesting.
|
kwangusbeef | 54 |
|
|
Lookin' good so far. Two teams that EAT clock!Submit
|
RichBlack | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rubberneck: now 49 Would you please explain your post? Im confused.
|
RichBlack | 12 |
|
|
My book is now down to 49 1/2. Tough to tell which way the line will move from here but the total will not get close IMO.
|
RichBlack | 12 |
|
|
SD / WAS under 51
Football Angle SD has been playing ball control football last 2 games and will continue today to keep their inept secondary off the field as much as possible. Phillip Rivers in the no huddle/no hurry offense is kryponite to an over backer. WAS struggled mightily on offense last week and is a run first team to begin with. Also, two of their scores last week came directly off turnovers. Reverse Line Movement This doesn't mean much if anything at all but the line started at 51 and although over bettors have been pounding away, I see the total dropped to 50.5. Maybe they're trying to entice over bettors by dropping the total under a key number. P.S. Public Perception on these two teams is no defense and high powered offenses so far through the year. The key here will be the long, boring, and drawn out ball control drives of SD and look for WAS offense to continue struggling. IMO SD 23 WAS 17 Thoughts?
|
RichBlack | 12 |
|
|
SD / WAS under 51
Football Angle SD has been playing ball control football last 2 games and will continue today to keep their inept secondary off the field as much as possible. Phillip Rivers in the no huddle/no hurry offense is kryponite to an over backer. WAS struggled mightily on offense last week and is a run first team to begin with. Also, two of their scores last week came directly off turnovers. Reverse Line Movement This doesn't mean much if anything at all but the line started at 51 and although over bettors have been pounding away, I see the total dropped to 50.5. Maybe they're trying to entice over bettors by dropping the total under a key number. P.S. Public Perception on these two teams is no defense and high powered offenses so far through the year. The key here will be the long, boring, and drawn out ball control drives of SD and look for WAS offense to continue struggling. IMO SD 23 WAS 17 |
pipedoctor | 21 |
|
|
You are the pure comedy with your useless threads. Green was thinking about running before catching the ball. Simple as that. You saying the catch was "clearly" something else makes me realize you're clearly an idiot.
|
HoldingXYZ | 8 |
|
|
It'll be easily over. Everyone and their momma will be on the under.
|
dcdaniel09 | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.