Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sullinger is soft, no question. I can't see him as a NBA player. I don't know when Aaron Craft started thinking he was Derrick Rose, but him trying to drive the lane and score over three guys in the last 2 minutes is an absolutely horrible decision. He did it at the end of the first half too which gave Kansas the momentum going into the half. Normally I don't believe in that kind of thing but it was obvious both Kansas and Ohio State were different teams in the 2nd half.
Thad Motta leaving Thomas on the bench for 7 minutes in the 2nd half, I never understand why coaches do that. I know he had 4 fouls, but I would make the officials take him out of the game by calling his 5th foul than just taking him out of the game myself. the officiating, as with all college basketball games, was absolutely atrocious for both teams. |
nc1capper | 4 |
|
|
Could be, maybe split the difference and make it 3.
|
Europa | 32 |
|
|
I guess Miami was upset they had to steal one at Charlotte earlier this week, and wanted to leave no doubt this time.
Will they be favored by 20 over someone this year? |
singkofive | 8 |
|
|
I'm surprised Pittsburgh wasn't more, but their offense has been struggling. The other two are about what I thought they would be.
I agree with you about the Falcons. I'm not sure I can make a case for Denver, it's just so hard for me to see them being able to score at all. I know these playoff lines are really sharp though. I might just have to stay away from the Den/Pitt game altogether. |
Europa | 32 |
|
|
They needed to be in a 3 way tie with the Bengals and someone else because they lost to the Bengals. The Titans and Bengals were the only teams that finished 9-7, so the Titans are out.
|
KyleBowler | 5 |
|
|
I'm sticking with Pitt -14. That might be a little high but I can't see less than 10. Who would bet Denver getting less than 10? I think this is a bigger mismatch than New Orleans/Seattle last year. I know Seattle won that one but I just can't see Denver pulling this off. They really should have finished the year 4-12.
|
neverchase93 | 33 |
|
|
I'd say 9/58.
I would also say the Saints are happy to see the Lions and not the Falcons. I think they would beat the Falcons too but that looked like the tougher of the two matchups. |
vegasslim | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Niners13: Because you watched todays game which means nothing... I don`t see -10.5 but I guess we``ll have to wait a bit to find out. How about last week's game where they got blown out by an awful Buffalo team, the week before that when New England blew them out at home. Or any of the other games Tebow started that teams just gave away to them. I do like that everyone thinks its going to be 7 and they're going to "pound the Steelers". I hope it is 7. I'll be very surprised if it is. |
bigslickk | 21 |
|
|
How about another punt return TD for Patrick Peterson
|
schoolboy86 | 14 |
|
|
Maybe i'm off base, but I just don't see any way that Pitt/Den line isn't double digits.
|
bigslickk | 21 |
|
|
New Orleans was a double digit favorite at Seattle last year, and I think this game is a bigger mismatch.
|
bigslickk | 21 |
|
|
Seattle is better than this Denver team. Anything can happen, but it's a real longshot.
|
gilligansisland | 14 |
|
|
I think Denver is far worse than Seattle was last year.
|
bigslickk | 21 |
|
|
what would you put the lines at? Pittsburgh -14, Houston -3?
|
bigslickk | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tsw: How is that "fishy" ? That Louisville kept playing to the end ? It's not that Louisville played until the end that someone might call "fishy". It's that the ref did not call one of the most obvious fouls of the whole game on the "turnover" that gave Louisville the ball back. But that is what college basketball is. The players are inexperienced, they do stupid things. The refs aren't good enough to work NBA games, so you have to deal with that too. |
QuintenBrady | 24 |
|
|
the Louisville player tackled the Kentucky player on that last play.
That ref just swallowed his whistle because the outcome of the game was
already decided.
College basketball officiating is really poor. There are many bad calls in every game. That one just happened to decide the cover. I used to think they were fishy, now I just think the refs are that bad. |
QuintenBrady | 24 |
|
|
I think the Bulls will win, but not like this.
I'll have to do some research, but it seems like whenever teams raise the banner they go out and get rolled. |
baller909 | 24 |
|
|
The whole "you can't mess with or question or look at this guy" thing is total BS. He's an official, he's not a player. No one is there to see him. When a player shows up an official, you have to hit him with the T. Seeing Joey Crawford call two quick T's on Celtics in a game that was decided by two points isn't what I waited almost two months to see.
Crawford staring down Marquis Daniels after calling the foul that ultimately decided the game was totally uncalled for. If Daniels so much as turns his head I think Crawford T's him up. He's an egotistical jerk and he has no place reffing a rec league game, much less officiating in the NBA. |
Budget_Baller | 6 |
|
|
Teddy Roosevelt
|
canovsp | 21 |
|
|
I saw that. The mistake was going down to a knee with no one around on the interception on the previous Vandy possession. You only do that if you can run out the clock. Georgia wasn't in a position to do that. He (I think it was Rambo) looked like he could have gotten the ball inside the 30 without much trouble. That blocked punt never happens if Georgia has that extra 20 yards.
|
Professional1 | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.