Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
iPhone 5 is scheduled to come out in October for those who were wondering.
|
NJDevils | 40 |
|
|
As of last night the coach said they were not playing. I'm riding the under myself |
KingHendrik | 3 |
|
|
DCM, Stros fan here, not sure I agree with you buddy. While I feel Cliff Lee can be overated at times, he's still one of the best in the game, just not a GOD like some make him out to be. I agree he blew toward the end of the season, but Sparky pointed out reasons for this. Almost all pitchers go through a bad stretch during the season as well. He just happened to hit his late, pretty normal if you ask me. Ever heard of a Big Game? Big Game Pitcher? Money Pitcher? Well, that is Cliff Lee. That is also why Pettite will be in the Hall of Fame. Cliff Lee is one of the top Big Game Pitchers in MLB. He didn't have the best WS, but he pitched amazing in the other Big Games of the Playoffs. Until he is a cancer in the locker room, he will benefit every major league club. I liked Lance, but all good things come to an end. He had his moments, but I'm sure its hard to be as motivated with a rebuilding team. He will be back in the organization at some capacity down the road, he has said as much. I can't hate on him too much except for wanting to go to the Cards. I think he'll be a liability in the field, might hinder them more than anything. |
dcmc34f | 83 |
|
|
Best sport in the world!!! GL Hammer, enjoyed your threads last year Oh yeah, Go Stros!! |
hammer22 | 44 |
|
|
replied to
For those taking future prices on teams to win the conference or superbowl...
in NFL Betting
Thanks, Rangerz. That is great advice, I played the Pats to win the AFC a couple of weeks ago. Now I'm realizing that may have been a mistake based on your logic.
|
rangerz2478 | 19 |
|
|
Hey Bettin, I just found your thread. I too have been killing the 2 play teaser this season. I played one earlier today for this weekend that I think you might like, curious to hear your thoughts. 6.5 pt teaser, Ravens +3.5 and Phil/GB OVER 39.5 |
BETTINHARDD | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
I haven't read into the drone theory Flash. All I'm really concerned with is the fact that Flight 77 did not and could not have hit the Pentagon. I've proven that in this thread. Was it a cruise missile instead? Possibly and more than likely. Was a drone involved? Possibly as well.
All I know for sure is the it was NOT Flight 77.
Kaponofor - you still haven't answered my 1 question. Do you now believe that Flight 77 took a Northern Approach to the Pentagon? (meaning it flew North of the Citgo gas station and directly over the Navy Annex building)
Yep, it is impossible. Confirmed by many, many,commercial airline pilots saying so. The flight path is IMPOSSIBLE to achieve |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
kaponofor
I just read that entire page you linked us to, and all it says was that the remains were identified by our government and/or a branch of the government that was devoted to DNA identification of badly disfigured human remains.
Why, though, are the files sealed and classified at the highest CIA clearance available? Yes, of course they say the remains have been identified. But why wont they SHOW US their research? They only claim to have identified all of them. Did you know even the victims families were not allowed to see the DNA matches? Only the government has.
But our Gov't never lies to us |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Here is a little more insight into the drone theory. This should provide you a starting point. https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5658198482624505213&q=9/11+crash#docid=7873472608486322785 |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
smdio | 1555 |
|
||
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
(1) Simple science and physics? Oh please explain, this should be fun. (2) I thought the gov't has never released photos of anything hitting the Pentagon -- now they've released 4 of them? (3) Where are you getting that its impossible for a plane to have that type of contrail near the ground? Really? Are you this freaking clueless? They've been available for years. Also, for a long time after 9-11 the Pentagon said they did not have any video or photos of the plane hitting then Pentagon. Only after the cries from the public reaching a fever pitch, did they release the photos and video. PROOF right there the Gov't lied to you. They clearly had photos and video when they def said they didn't. Do some god damned research for Christ sake Below is a link on the first page of Google when searching for this. You can find these 4 photographs (frames) and video from MANY sources. You be the judge. https://killtown.911review.org/flight77/video.html
|
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
"A drone plane hit the Pentagon, followed by a missle. They painted this drone in AA logos and colors. There is clear record of a drone plane gone missing from the Gov't inventory shortly before 9/11. It has still yet to be accounted for. Except the wheels in the photos match that of the missing drone plane. " THIS is a new one, haven't heard this yet. Can you point me to where the government keeps public records of drone planes? Or where it would show that there was "one missing"? And what the wheels look like on that drone? Why the need for the missile on top of the drone plane? I agree it sounds like a stretch until you start researching. A group of us researched this in 2003. The info is out there but it has been 7 years since I have researched this particular event. Its public record, you just have to dig. An easier comparison would be to compare the wheels of an AA plane and compare it with the wheels in the photo. They're different. Good luck on your search. I only want to inspire people to do their own research. Only then will they understand the events of that day. Do not take mine or anyone elses word for it. Look at the facts, timeline, and physics behind the events. Then form your own conclusion. |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
You guys are kidding yourselves if you think that if the gov't released a video and/or photographs of a plane hitting the Pentagon that you'd be satisfied. You'd try to poke holes in that -- just like you have done with every single other piece of evidence that doesn't support your wild conspiracy theory: "It's Photoshopped!" "It's from the government, it's not trustworthy!" "The angle of the plane is incorrect according to my GED in Mechanical Engineering" "The color palette is wrong on the AA wing" Actually Kapono, simple science and phsyics dissprove the 4 photographs the Pentagon released of the plane, (I mean missle) hitting the Pentagon. The photographs show a clear contrail behind the plane hitting the Pentagon. Well, guess what? It is impossible to have a plane generate a contrail at ground level. What most people do not realize, this is the smoking gun |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Why would that be any different than the photos that clearly show parts of an AA airplane on the ground near the Pentagon? I mean if that was photoshopped, then any piece of evidence that comes from the gov't is untrustworthy to the conspiracy theorists. You are correct in your first sentence. There are pictures of what looks like parts of an AA airplane. However, the wheels do not match that of the plane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. I really don't feel like digging up all the evidence to back up my next statement, but I trust everyone on here is more than capable of pulling it up yoursleves if you indeed care enough. A drone plane hit the Pentagon, followed by a missle. They painted this drone in AA logos and colors. There is clear record of a drone plane gone missing from the Gov't inventory shortly before 9/11. It has still yet to be accounted for. Except the wheels in the photos match that of the missing drone plane. Have fun researching if you dare |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
You're 100% wrong and naive if you think that's true. If I see a photograph of Flight 77 flying into the Pentagon, I will admit I was wrong and apologize to those necessary. I'm sure all others that share my views would do the same.
Yup |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by like2betmore:
Im sure there were moles in our government involved in the incident. But that doesnt mean our government knew what was going to come. Even if there was a cover up who to say it wasnt the act of a few individuals in high up places that did it as oppose to everyone in the government. Honestly a lot of people in our government are just sheeps and do as they are told. We give so much power to so few people. This is what most people do not understand, and prevents most people from comprehending how this would be possible. Glad to see this thread is still running. Kudos to Covers for letting it happen. This is the single most important event of our lifetime. Because it keeps getting thrown back in our face, it is absolutely righteous and patriotic to question the event itself and to want to learn the truth. There are millions of us out there and we are not going to give up no matter how uncomfortable the truth is. |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
Here's a thought. I have a feeling a large % of the haters on here are different aliases for the Covers Experts. They are not coming here from the books like some have suggested. Why pay a Covers Expert if you have winning people to follow in the forums?? Please don't let them win invest. I respect the hell outta what you do, and its just a hobby for me. I could care less if you play everyday, do what makes you happy I just hate it when evil people win, BOL |
investments4you | 350 |
|
|
Denver fan here, and I absolutely LOVE the over. The winner of the game looks like a coin flip. Chiefs struggle against the pass, check their game against Houston. Denver coming off a bye, should come out passing well I feel. Denver for years has struggled against the run, and KC should be able to have their way in the ground game. I look for two tired second half defenses, and that should lead to the over. May play a 2H Over at halftime too, we'll see. BOL |
MoneyShot | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by IrishKing:
I hope Covers never allows this sort of non sports thread to appear again. Conspiracy nuts are always tying to personalize their feverish nonsense by saying someone close to them died during the critical events. Sorry, I don't believe that smdio's father died on 9/11/01 at the WTC. Everything that anyone says in any forum is always subject to proof. Anonymous forums especially. Actually, this shows the strength of Covers. Covers |
smdio | 1555 |
|
|
smdio | 1555 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.