And the biggest reason out of those three is Enthusiasm !!! People are so upset about the failed leadership of Obama they are coming out to Vote Obama out of office. People are Pissed!!!
Obama--no surprise--is winning news cycles, but Romney is winning the election.
And he is doing so because a majority of the American people have simply had enough nastiness, enough radicalism, enough of this president.
And the biggest reason out of those three is Enthusiasm !!! People are so upset about the failed leadership of Obama they are coming out to Vote Obama out of office. People are Pissed!!!
Obama--no surprise--is winning news cycles, but Romney is winning the election.
And he is doing so because a majority of the American people have simply had enough nastiness, enough radicalism, enough of this president.
Consistent with a recent Pew Research survey that found a majority of voters voting for Romney are now affirmatively voting for him instead of merely against President Barack Obama, Republicans in Colorado have said they have not seen the level of enthusiasm for Republicans that they are seeing for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in a decade.
According to the Denver Post:
Most Republicans contend that the last time the GOP top of the ticket in Colorado was this strong was in 2002, when Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard ran for re-election.
The Romney campaign released a web video Saturday highlighting the enthusiasm of Colorado's voters for the Romney-Ryan ticket, reflected by the overflow crowd at the two men's appearance with Kid Rock at Red Rocks Amphitheater:
Consistent with a recent Pew Research survey that found a majority of voters voting for Romney are now affirmatively voting for him instead of merely against President Barack Obama, Republicans in Colorado have said they have not seen the level of enthusiasm for Republicans that they are seeing for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in a decade.
According to the Denver Post:
Most Republicans contend that the last time the GOP top of the ticket in Colorado was this strong was in 2002, when Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard ran for re-election.
The Romney campaign released a web video Saturday highlighting the enthusiasm of Colorado's voters for the Romney-Ryan ticket, reflected by the overflow crowd at the two men's appearance with Kid Rock at Red Rocks Amphitheater:
Most Republicans contend that the last time the GOP top of the ticket in Colorado was this strong was in 2002, when Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard ran for re-election.
The Romney campaign released a web video Saturday highlighting the enthusiasm of Colorado's voters for the Romney-Ryan ticket, reflected by the overflow crowd at the two men's appearance with Kid Rock at Red Rocks Amphitheater:
Most Republicans contend that the last time the GOP top of the ticket in Colorado was this strong was in 2002, when Gov. Bill Owens and U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard ran for re-election.
The Romney campaign released a web video Saturday highlighting the enthusiasm of Colorado's voters for the Romney-Ryan ticket, reflected by the overflow crowd at the two men's appearance with Kid Rock at Red Rocks Amphitheater:
The enthusiasm issue was addressed on all the Sunday talk shows. Meet the Press, Face the Nation, etc. Romney having 30,000 show up last night in the cold, Obama getting 4,000. So that's not a bias, that's a fact. The outcome will be close. The betting lines showing that 280-290 EV over/under back this up. However the ML bet is weighting this in Obama's favor. Okay so that is saying things honestly.
But I think you have to acknowledge that those with a microphone far outnumber outlets like Breitbart, Fox News, etc. They have done their best to say this is over. Hence I think you have skewed lines. The sample sizes of Democrats have been skewed. Everyone is looking at Ohio even though either side can get there without it. Romney campaign did a major fuckup on the Jeep commercial in Ohio. That ad might come back to bite him in the ass. We'll see. One thing is for sure if Romney does not take NC and VA it is probably over. So I think we get that news fairly early.
My money is on Romney. I think when you can get a dog at this value that has a legit shot at winning you have to take it.
The enthusiasm issue was addressed on all the Sunday talk shows. Meet the Press, Face the Nation, etc. Romney having 30,000 show up last night in the cold, Obama getting 4,000. So that's not a bias, that's a fact. The outcome will be close. The betting lines showing that 280-290 EV over/under back this up. However the ML bet is weighting this in Obama's favor. Okay so that is saying things honestly.
But I think you have to acknowledge that those with a microphone far outnumber outlets like Breitbart, Fox News, etc. They have done their best to say this is over. Hence I think you have skewed lines. The sample sizes of Democrats have been skewed. Everyone is looking at Ohio even though either side can get there without it. Romney campaign did a major fuckup on the Jeep commercial in Ohio. That ad might come back to bite him in the ass. We'll see. One thing is for sure if Romney does not take NC and VA it is probably over. So I think we get that news fairly early.
My money is on Romney. I think when you can get a dog at this value that has a legit shot at winning you have to take it.
The enthusiasm issue was addressed on all the Sunday talk shows. Meet the Press, Face the Nation, etc. Romney having 30,000 show up last night in the cold, Obama getting 4,000. So that's not a bias, that's a fact. The outcome will be close. The betting lines showing that 280-290 EV over/under back this up. However the ML bet is weighting this in Obama's favor. Okay so that is saying things honestly.
But I think you have to acknowledge that those with a microphone far outnumber outlets like Breitbart, Fox News, etc. They have done their best to say this is over. Hence I think you have skewed lines. The sample sizes of Democrats have been skewed. Everyone is looking at Ohio even though either side can get there without it. Romney campaign did a major fuckup on the Jeep commercial in Ohio. That ad might come back to bite him in the ass. We'll see. One thing is for sure if Romney does not take NC and VA it is probably over. So I think we get that news fairly early.
My money is on Romney. I think when you can get a dog at this value that has a legit shot at winning you have to take it.
Well said OneEye. All we have is Fox News, twitter, facebook, and a few outlets like Breitbart. Everything else is skewed LEFTY. Romney wins!!!!
Nobody would even know of Benghazigate if it wasn't for FOX NEWS.
The enthusiasm issue was addressed on all the Sunday talk shows. Meet the Press, Face the Nation, etc. Romney having 30,000 show up last night in the cold, Obama getting 4,000. So that's not a bias, that's a fact. The outcome will be close. The betting lines showing that 280-290 EV over/under back this up. However the ML bet is weighting this in Obama's favor. Okay so that is saying things honestly.
But I think you have to acknowledge that those with a microphone far outnumber outlets like Breitbart, Fox News, etc. They have done their best to say this is over. Hence I think you have skewed lines. The sample sizes of Democrats have been skewed. Everyone is looking at Ohio even though either side can get there without it. Romney campaign did a major fuckup on the Jeep commercial in Ohio. That ad might come back to bite him in the ass. We'll see. One thing is for sure if Romney does not take NC and VA it is probably over. So I think we get that news fairly early.
My money is on Romney. I think when you can get a dog at this value that has a legit shot at winning you have to take it.
Well said OneEye. All we have is Fox News, twitter, facebook, and a few outlets like Breitbart. Everything else is skewed LEFTY. Romney wins!!!!
Nobody would even know of Benghazigate if it wasn't for FOX NEWS.
To your point about the past, those election years did not have the huge swing for one party like the 2008 election. None of the polls are perfect but the complaint this year is that 2008 data is being used for the 2012 polls. Honest people know that if you do that you are going to overstate the Democratic percentage of voting and thereby overstate the Obama polling results. Nothing more complicated than that. Even Democratic strategists are not expecting the Obama 2008 results to be repeated. They know it will be something less. The question is whether it will be 9 million votes less.
To your point about the past, those election years did not have the huge swing for one party like the 2008 election. None of the polls are perfect but the complaint this year is that 2008 data is being used for the 2012 polls. Honest people know that if you do that you are going to overstate the Democratic percentage of voting and thereby overstate the Obama polling results. Nothing more complicated than that. Even Democratic strategists are not expecting the Obama 2008 results to be repeated. They know it will be something less. The question is whether it will be 9 million votes less.
Offshore lines have never been wrong about the winner of the Presidential election. Obama, Bush and Bush '00 were all favorites heading into election day.
Offshore lines have never been wrong about the winner of the Presidential election. Obama, Bush and Bush '00 were all favorites heading into election day.
Offshore lines have never been wrong about the winner of the Presidential election. Obama, Bush and Bush '00 were all favorites heading into election day.
So why isn't the line -1000? I mean if it so certain.
Offshore lines have never been wrong about the winner of the Presidential election. Obama, Bush and Bush '00 were all favorites heading into election day.
So why isn't the line -1000? I mean if it so certain.
So why isn't the line -1000? I mean if it so certain.
it's hard to understand how someone who wagers money could ask this question... but ok...
as for the OP... i have some reading material for you... if you have never heard of FiveThirtyEight... it is a group that breaks down all of the polls, over and over... tracks them... evaluates them for possible bias... analyzes their past predictive abilities... in short, these guys are freaking masterminds of statistics, and in my opinion, the absolute most credible source there is when telling you what to make of the polls, and ultimately determining the likelihood each candidate will win the electoral college... chances of winning each state... just a shitload of statistical probabilities...
they have never wrongly predicted the election winner, and as some of these articles point out... this year's election has a much greater sampling of polls, and greater number of polls in action... they essentially conclude that their statistical breakdowns this year should prove to be the most reliable of any election to date...
these are a few recent articles from FiveThirtyEight, and how they view this... they are unbias, unaffiliated with either party... they are just trying to make correct predictions...
essentially... your confidence is unfounded... yes, i watch FoxNews, too... they have you brimming... you might want to find a less biased source of information...
So why isn't the line -1000? I mean if it so certain.
it's hard to understand how someone who wagers money could ask this question... but ok...
as for the OP... i have some reading material for you... if you have never heard of FiveThirtyEight... it is a group that breaks down all of the polls, over and over... tracks them... evaluates them for possible bias... analyzes their past predictive abilities... in short, these guys are freaking masterminds of statistics, and in my opinion, the absolute most credible source there is when telling you what to make of the polls, and ultimately determining the likelihood each candidate will win the electoral college... chances of winning each state... just a shitload of statistical probabilities...
they have never wrongly predicted the election winner, and as some of these articles point out... this year's election has a much greater sampling of polls, and greater number of polls in action... they essentially conclude that their statistical breakdowns this year should prove to be the most reliable of any election to date...
these are a few recent articles from FiveThirtyEight, and how they view this... they are unbias, unaffiliated with either party... they are just trying to make correct predictions...
essentially... your confidence is unfounded... yes, i watch FoxNews, too... they have you brimming... you might want to find a less biased source of information...
Obama wins because he's been a good president that's had to deal with a crappy hand. Romney loses because he's a war-mongering, racist, elitist that was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
Obama wins because he's been a good president that's had to deal with a crappy hand. Romney loses because he's a war-mongering, racist, elitist that was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
Obama wins because he's been a good president that's had to deal with a crappy hand. Romney loses because he's a war-mongering, racist, elitist that was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
If I want to read this, I just have to pick up a campaign lit. from the Democrats. Are you related to SirJohn??
Obama wins because he's been a good president that's had to deal with a crappy hand. Romney loses because he's a war-mongering, racist, elitist that was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.
If I want to read this, I just have to pick up a campaign lit. from the Democrats. Are you related to SirJohn??
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.