No matter.She just guaranteed 8 years for Romney,8 more for Palin,then 8 for Rubio.Obama will have been deported by the time another Democrat sees the Oval Office.
Angela Whory has shown her bias today ... asking for everybody to pray for her... law enforcement officers and lawyers for the state of Flordia and the Martin family... conspicuously absent were her request for prayers for Zimmerman or his family. ...
In her statement she mentioned that their office took the case not simply to investigate whether or not a crime took place,but to seek justice for Trayvon ..Trayvon? ..first name ...she uses his first name ..
Her job is not to seek justice for Trayvon ...but to seek the truth..
Angela Whory has shown her bias today ... asking for everybody to pray for her... law enforcement officers and lawyers for the state of Flordia and the Martin family... conspicuously absent were her request for prayers for Zimmerman or his family. ...
In her statement she mentioned that their office took the case not simply to investigate whether or not a crime took place,but to seek justice for Trayvon ..Trayvon? ..first name ...she uses his first name ..
Her job is not to seek justice for Trayvon ...but to seek the truth..
Angela Whory has shown her bias today ... asking for everybody to pray for her... law enforcement officers and lawyers for the state of Flordia and the Martin family... conspicuously absent were her request for prayers for Zimmerman or his family. ...
In her statement she mentioned that their office took the case not simply to investigate whether or not a crime took place,but to seek justice for Trayvon ..Trayvon? ..first name ...she uses his first name ..
Her job is not to seek justice for Trayvon ...but to seek the truth..
Angela Whory has shown her bias today ... asking for everybody to pray for her... law enforcement officers and lawyers for the state of Flordia and the Martin family... conspicuously absent were her request for prayers for Zimmerman or his family. ...
In her statement she mentioned that their office took the case not simply to investigate whether or not a crime took place,but to seek justice for Trayvon ..Trayvon? ..first name ...she uses his first name ..
Her job is not to seek justice for Trayvon ...but to seek the truth..
That's what it sounds like ...make it personal ...
Also in her giddy statement she said ..
Just moments ago we spoke with Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, the sweet parents of Trayvon," Cory said ..
"the sweet parents ?".......
That's what it sounds like ...make it personal ...
Also in her giddy statement she said ..
Just moments ago we spoke with Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, the sweet parents of Trayvon," Cory said ..
"the sweet parents ?".......
I suggest researching a bit about Ms. Corey before making such proclamations. From what I understand, she makes right wingers seem, well like independent moderates.
By the way, it is kind of funny, righties:
Old CW (when Zimmerman wasn't charged): prosecutors did their jobs.
New CW (when Zimmerman was charged): she is biased.
Notice the hypocrisy?
As an aside, as the ONLY post I will make on this subject until I see actual evidence she looked at, there are no winners here. I have no idea whether the right nor wrong decision was made. Either a boy is wrongfully dead or an innocent man will be fighting to keep himself out of prison for years.
Its called pragmatism.
I suggest researching a bit about Ms. Corey before making such proclamations. From what I understand, she makes right wingers seem, well like independent moderates.
By the way, it is kind of funny, righties:
Old CW (when Zimmerman wasn't charged): prosecutors did their jobs.
New CW (when Zimmerman was charged): she is biased.
Notice the hypocrisy?
As an aside, as the ONLY post I will make on this subject until I see actual evidence she looked at, there are no winners here. I have no idea whether the right nor wrong decision was made. Either a boy is wrongfully dead or an innocent man will be fighting to keep himself out of prison for years.
Its called pragmatism.
* charge ...he is charged with murder in the 2nd degree..
* charge ...he is charged with murder in the 2nd degree..
The truth comes first..than justice for Zimmerman or Trayvon...
The truth comes first..than justice for Zimmerman or Trayvon...
Years ago (not sure exactly when), there was a death penalty study conducted. The conclusion shocked people, especially those who insisted race played a huge factor in the application. The conclusion was the Defendant's race was not a factor in the application of the death penalty. The factor, rather, seemed to be the race of the victim. I am too tired to google it but when the victim was non-white, the actual rate at which the DP occurred was significantly decreased. This presented for interesting interpretations, one of which where those who argued that less investigative work applied to non-white victim murder cases.
To me, I don't really care about the race of either. I also do not agree that the media is playing the race issue. Rather, it is a media driven story. A young boy is dead, carrying a bag of skittles. To the black community, the failures were inherent in the system. To the media, the case involves the death of a child and the person who pulled the trigger not facing charges. It sells stories, it creates hype.
Everyone seems to be playing their role based on what they are attempting to accomplish.
As I said above, there are no winners. Justice is always going to be subjective.
Years ago (not sure exactly when), there was a death penalty study conducted. The conclusion shocked people, especially those who insisted race played a huge factor in the application. The conclusion was the Defendant's race was not a factor in the application of the death penalty. The factor, rather, seemed to be the race of the victim. I am too tired to google it but when the victim was non-white, the actual rate at which the DP occurred was significantly decreased. This presented for interesting interpretations, one of which where those who argued that less investigative work applied to non-white victim murder cases.
To me, I don't really care about the race of either. I also do not agree that the media is playing the race issue. Rather, it is a media driven story. A young boy is dead, carrying a bag of skittles. To the black community, the failures were inherent in the system. To the media, the case involves the death of a child and the person who pulled the trigger not facing charges. It sells stories, it creates hype.
Everyone seems to be playing their role based on what they are attempting to accomplish.
As I said above, there are no winners. Justice is always going to be subjective.
Angela Corey asked for prayers for Trayvon's family and "our prosecution team?"
I have to say, that seemed odd.
She also was a little too preachy on the matter and her use of the phrase "Justice for Trayvon" seemed to indicate bias.
The whole thing seemed kind of surreal to be honest.
Angela Corey asked for prayers for Trayvon's family and "our prosecution team?"
I have to say, that seemed odd.
She also was a little too preachy on the matter and her use of the phrase "Justice for Trayvon" seemed to indicate bias.
The whole thing seemed kind of surreal to be honest.
I suggest researching a bit about Ms. Corey before making such proclamations. From what I understand, she makes right wingers seem, well like independent moderates.
By the way, it is kind of funny, righties:
Old CW (when Zimmerman wasn't charged): prosecutors did their jobs.
New CW (when Zimmerman was charged): she is biased.
Notice the hypocrisy?
As an aside, as the ONLY post I will make on this subject until I see actual evidence she looked at, there are no winners here. I have no idea whether the right nor wrong decision was made. Either a boy is wrongfully dead or an innocent man will be fighting to keep himself out of prison for years.
Its called pragmatism.
Djbrow,
I find your new found pragmatism interesting. Meaning, you asserted factually that a proper investigation wasn't conducted, and there seems to be no indication of that. Especially given the prosecutor said on live television that:
A. The police conducted a "thorough and intensive investigation"
B. Said investigation was instrumental in assisting the prosecutor.
C. There are numerous homicide cases where the defendant is not immediately arrested.
Notice the hypocrisy?
I suggest researching a bit about Ms. Corey before making such proclamations. From what I understand, she makes right wingers seem, well like independent moderates.
By the way, it is kind of funny, righties:
Old CW (when Zimmerman wasn't charged): prosecutors did their jobs.
New CW (when Zimmerman was charged): she is biased.
Notice the hypocrisy?
As an aside, as the ONLY post I will make on this subject until I see actual evidence she looked at, there are no winners here. I have no idea whether the right nor wrong decision was made. Either a boy is wrongfully dead or an innocent man will be fighting to keep himself out of prison for years.
Its called pragmatism.
Djbrow,
I find your new found pragmatism interesting. Meaning, you asserted factually that a proper investigation wasn't conducted, and there seems to be no indication of that. Especially given the prosecutor said on live television that:
A. The police conducted a "thorough and intensive investigation"
B. Said investigation was instrumental in assisting the prosecutor.
C. There are numerous homicide cases where the defendant is not immediately arrested.
Notice the hypocrisy?
Angela Corey asked for prayers for Trayvon's family and "our prosecution team?"
I have to say, that seemed odd.
She also was a little too preachy on the matter and her use of the phrase "Justice for Trayvon" seemed to indicate bias.
The whole thing seemed kind of surreal to be honest.
Angela Corey asked for prayers for Trayvon's family and "our prosecution team?"
I have to say, that seemed odd.
She also was a little too preachy on the matter and her use of the phrase "Justice for Trayvon" seemed to indicate bias.
The whole thing seemed kind of surreal to be honest.
Djbrow,
I find your new found pragmatism interesting. Meaning, you asserted factually that a proper investigation wasn't conducted, and there seems to be no indication of that. Especially given the prosecutor said on live television that:
A. The police conducted a "thorough and intensive investigation"
B. Said investigation was instrumental in assisting the prosecutor.
C. There are numerous homicide cases where the defendant is not immediately arrested.
Notice the hypocrisy?
I have never said Zimmerman should have been arrested. I, unlike you, don't profess to know the facts in this case. I have said that numerous times. I don't know whether Corey looked at different information than the previous State's attorney. She referenced new information but we don't know what that is. We also don't know if this information was obtained at her behest because it was not obtained beforehand.
As an aside, a prosecutor would never publically say the police did a poor job unless he/she wanted Defendant's counsel's opening statement to be "even the State's attorney believes the police did a poor job investigating."
I have said from the start that the poor investigation could actually hurt Zimmerman. For example, the 13 year old boy who said he witnessed the incident and supported Zimmerman's version at first. His story has changed. A written statement would have been helpful to the defense. Why did they not obtain a statement from Martin's girfriend at the start? Same with ballistics.
I have found that initial statements are far more accurate than those given weeks later, for obvious reasons.
If you want to discuss this, please reply all and address the post rather than take a statement out of context, otherwise I probably wont' respond.
Djbrow,
I find your new found pragmatism interesting. Meaning, you asserted factually that a proper investigation wasn't conducted, and there seems to be no indication of that. Especially given the prosecutor said on live television that:
A. The police conducted a "thorough and intensive investigation"
B. Said investigation was instrumental in assisting the prosecutor.
C. There are numerous homicide cases where the defendant is not immediately arrested.
Notice the hypocrisy?
I have never said Zimmerman should have been arrested. I, unlike you, don't profess to know the facts in this case. I have said that numerous times. I don't know whether Corey looked at different information than the previous State's attorney. She referenced new information but we don't know what that is. We also don't know if this information was obtained at her behest because it was not obtained beforehand.
As an aside, a prosecutor would never publically say the police did a poor job unless he/she wanted Defendant's counsel's opening statement to be "even the State's attorney believes the police did a poor job investigating."
I have said from the start that the poor investigation could actually hurt Zimmerman. For example, the 13 year old boy who said he witnessed the incident and supported Zimmerman's version at first. His story has changed. A written statement would have been helpful to the defense. Why did they not obtain a statement from Martin's girfriend at the start? Same with ballistics.
I have found that initial statements are far more accurate than those given weeks later, for obvious reasons.
If you want to discuss this, please reply all and address the post rather than take a statement out of context, otherwise I probably wont' respond.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.