j) Since 2014, an away dog of less 7 points before week 5 off a loss, whose point spread is less than the average margin of the two teams....61-26 ATS (+2.9)....ON Falcons, Panthers, Seahawks, Giants....this has been 25-9 ATS in week 2 since 2013. Explaining this, as an example, the Falcons average margin is -3, and the Vikings is +3....the predicted line using just averages (in this case there is no average because there's only been one game played),...the line would be Falcons +6 (three minus negative three) and then two and half points are added for home field.....rather than a line of Falcons plus 8.5 points, the betting line is +3.5 AD and week<5 and line < oA(margin) +2.5 - tA(margin) and season > 2013
Nice one
add division and week 2 and you get 12-7 ats 63.2% and 7-12 O/U I've been getting a few for the Giants
#25 you get Giants again and Car which I've been getting a few , cant get myself to go with Car
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
j) Since 2014, an away dog of less 7 points before week 5 off a loss, whose point spread is less than the average margin of the two teams....61-26 ATS (+2.9)....ON Falcons, Panthers, Seahawks, Giants....this has been 25-9 ATS in week 2 since 2013. Explaining this, as an example, the Falcons average margin is -3, and the Vikings is +3....the predicted line using just averages (in this case there is no average because there's only been one game played),...the line would be Falcons +6 (three minus negative three) and then two and half points are added for home field.....rather than a line of Falcons plus 8.5 points, the betting line is +3.5 AD and week<5 and line < oA(margin) +2.5 - tA(margin) and season > 2013
Nice one
add division and week 2 and you get 12-7 ats 63.2% and 7-12 O/U I've been getting a few for the Giants
#25 you get Giants again and Car which I've been getting a few , cant get myself to go with Car
I have joined a free NFL pick 5 ATS games a week contest They give consensus data on which lyhebpopularvyeams are selected. It’s early in the week but the popular teams are : Cowboys #4 Saints Jets #3 Packers #6 Chargers Cardinals #5 Steelers #1 Falcons #2
Thanks for that...almost certainly I'll fade the Falcons as we get later in the week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
I have joined a free NFL pick 5 ATS games a week contest They give consensus data on which lyhebpopularvyeams are selected. It’s early in the week but the popular teams are : Cowboys #4 Saints Jets #3 Packers #6 Chargers Cardinals #5 Steelers #1 Falcons #2
Thanks for that...almost certainly I'll fade the Falcons as we get later in the week.
o) A week 2 away dog off a loss that was outyarded by at least 100 yards in that loss.....25-33-1 ATS (-2.0), 16-43 straight up (-9.1).....VERSUS Panthers, Seahawks, Giants
If our away dog's present opponent outyarded their opponent their previous game this moves to 6-18 ATS (-6.0), 3-21 straight up (-13.6)....this becomes 0-5 ATS (-10.1), 0-5 straight up (-18.6) if our away dog lost that previous game on the road.....VERSUS Giants
p:L and AD and week=2 and p:TY-po:TY<-100 and opo:TY<op:TY
0
o) A week 2 away dog off a loss that was outyarded by at least 100 yards in that loss.....25-33-1 ATS (-2.0), 16-43 straight up (-9.1).....VERSUS Panthers, Seahawks, Giants
If our away dog's present opponent outyarded their opponent their previous game this moves to 6-18 ATS (-6.0), 3-21 straight up (-13.6)....this becomes 0-5 ATS (-10.1), 0-5 straight up (-18.6) if our away dog lost that previous game on the road.....VERSUS Giants
p:L and AD and week=2 and p:TY-po:TY<-100 and opo:TY<op:TY
Though there are a myriad of angles supporting the Panthers, Giants, Bears and Seahawks I cannot pull the trigger on these teams with their very questionable quarterbacks.
In actuality, those types of teams if they were to start out 0-4 are very good bets later in the season as dogs off a loss.....much like Will Levis last year, those quarterbacks often find ways of blowing a game and the cover for bettors when they often should/could win their games. My view is that one needs a quarterback to cover on the road, and defense and a running game are more important at home, though competent to excellent quarterbacks that can run....like Murray, Jackson, Josh Allen often are stellar at covering on the road.
0
Deleting Seahawks play.
Plays for 1.5 units:
1) Jaguars +3'
2) Chiefs +1
3) Titans +5'
Adding.....
4) Commanders +3, -100
Though there are a myriad of angles supporting the Panthers, Giants, Bears and Seahawks I cannot pull the trigger on these teams with their very questionable quarterbacks.
In actuality, those types of teams if they were to start out 0-4 are very good bets later in the season as dogs off a loss.....much like Will Levis last year, those quarterbacks often find ways of blowing a game and the cover for bettors when they often should/could win their games. My view is that one needs a quarterback to cover on the road, and defense and a running game are more important at home, though competent to excellent quarterbacks that can run....like Murray, Jackson, Josh Allen often are stellar at covering on the road.
Looks like you have the time, or you wouldn't have stopped in to read it, now don't say I didn't read it I just looked to see who he was playing. And I'm sure it's not the first time you stopped in.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Juventusfan:
Nobody has time to read this sh!t
Looks like you have the time, or you wouldn't have stopped in to read it, now don't say I didn't read it I just looked to see who he was playing. And I'm sure it's not the first time you stopped in.
Both the Falcons and Bears lines jumped the fence before kickoff in Week One. Both closed as favorites, so the division home dog week one angle was just 1-1 in my book. Still a solid angle. Came close to being 2-0.
0
Both the Falcons and Bears lines jumped the fence before kickoff in Week One. Both closed as favorites, so the division home dog week one angle was just 1-1 in my book. Still a solid angle. Came close to being 2-0.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.