I don't know the stats on this. But especially PrimeTime Games.
My prediction will be Jets cover the game.
Houston next game is against GB (who lost to Indy) will be on SNF.
Jets will play Indy( who won against GB)
Jets (winner) vs Indy (winner)
Houston (loser) vs GB (loser)
Other examples of this trend.
Den (loser) vs SD (loser) on next MNF.
NY (winner) vs SF (winner) next week.
Simple terms, especially for Primetime Games or Big Matchups, they are usually (winner/winner) or (loser/loser). The house always want 50/50 action. Please share if anyone else has info on this trend. This is also true for college football.
I don't know the stats on this. But especially PrimeTime Games.
My prediction will be Jets cover the game.
Houston next game is against GB (who lost to Indy) will be on SNF.
Jets will play Indy( who won against GB)
Jets (winner) vs Indy (winner)
Houston (loser) vs GB (loser)
Other examples of this trend.
Den (loser) vs SD (loser) on next MNF.
NY (winner) vs SF (winner) next week.
Simple terms, especially for Primetime Games or Big Matchups, they are usually (winner/winner) or (loser/loser). The house always want 50/50 action. Please share if anyone else has info on this trend. This is also true for college football.
This isn't an angle...this is a hunch? You provided no relevant stats or proof. Your most definitive statement is "they are usually..." with nothing to back it up. If the house wants 50/50 splits then they fail to do their job on about 2/3 of the NFL tickets. They have sides just like we do, they're good at their job. We can't share info on this trend b/c its not a 'trend' its a guess that you poorly stated with zero factual evidence, and then went so far as to further support your stupidity with "also true for cfb."
To quote film...
Mr. Lokes, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
This isn't an angle...this is a hunch? You provided no relevant stats or proof. Your most definitive statement is "they are usually..." with nothing to back it up. If the house wants 50/50 splits then they fail to do their job on about 2/3 of the NFL tickets. They have sides just like we do, they're good at their job. We can't share info on this trend b/c its not a 'trend' its a guess that you poorly stated with zero factual evidence, and then went so far as to further support your stupidity with "also true for cfb."
To quote film...
Mr. Lokes, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
And as we speak, the opening line for SNF matchup GB @ Houston is -5.5. Already has dropped to -5. If Houston blows out Jets, this line should open at least -7 to -7.5.
Just another angle to look at. Good luck whichever way you decide. Jets +10 here. Go Jets!!!!
And as we speak, the opening line for SNF matchup GB @ Houston is -5.5. Already has dropped to -5. If Houston blows out Jets, this line should open at least -7 to -7.5.
Just another angle to look at. Good luck whichever way you decide. Jets +10 here. Go Jets!!!!
T_Rav...Thanks for your kind words. I don't have the time to go back to and track all games. But this happens more often than not. You can go back and track the data yourself. Either way good luck with you play. JETS!!!
T_Rav...Thanks for your kind words. I don't have the time to go back to and track all games. But this happens more often than not. You can go back and track the data yourself. Either way good luck with you play. JETS!!!
I don't know the stats on this. But especially PrimeTime Games.
My prediction will be Jets cover the game.
Houston next game is against GB (who lost to Indy) will be on SNF.
Jets will play Indy( who won against GB)
Jets (winner) vs Indy (winner)
Houston (loser) vs GB (loser)
Other examples of this trend.
Den (loser) vs SD (loser) on next MNF.
NY (winner) vs SF (winner) next week.
Simple terms, especially for Primetime Games or Big Matchups, they are usually (winner/winner) or (loser/loser). The house always want 50/50 action. Please share if anyone else has info on this trend. This is also true for college football.
I need more than 1 example to convince me Jets +9.5 is the play.
I don't know the stats on this. But especially PrimeTime Games.
My prediction will be Jets cover the game.
Houston next game is against GB (who lost to Indy) will be on SNF.
Jets will play Indy( who won against GB)
Jets (winner) vs Indy (winner)
Houston (loser) vs GB (loser)
Other examples of this trend.
Den (loser) vs SD (loser) on next MNF.
NY (winner) vs SF (winner) next week.
Simple terms, especially for Primetime Games or Big Matchups, they are usually (winner/winner) or (loser/loser). The house always want 50/50 action. Please share if anyone else has info on this trend. This is also true for college football.
I need more than 1 example to convince me Jets +9.5 is the play.
This isn't an angle...this is a hunch? You provided no relevant stats or proof. Your most definitive statement is "they are usually..." with nothing to back it up. If the house wants 50/50 splits then they fail to do their job on about 2/3 of the NFL tickets. They have sides just like we do, they're good at their job. We can't share info on this trend b/c its not a 'trend' its a guess that you poorly stated with zero factual evidence, and then went so far as to further support your stupidity with "also true for cfb."
To quote film...
Mr. Lokes, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
This isn't an angle...this is a hunch? You provided no relevant stats or proof. Your most definitive statement is "they are usually..." with nothing to back it up. If the house wants 50/50 splits then they fail to do their job on about 2/3 of the NFL tickets. They have sides just like we do, they're good at their job. We can't share info on this trend b/c its not a 'trend' its a guess that you poorly stated with zero factual evidence, and then went so far as to further support your stupidity with "also true for cfb."
To quote film...
Mr. Lokes, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Like I said, this happens more often that not. And it makes sense. The house wants evenly bet matchups. They want 50/50 action or close to it. The house would never want lopsided action on one team. It's just information and angle to consider. JETS JETS JETS!!!
Like I said, this happens more often that not. And it makes sense. The house wants evenly bet matchups. They want 50/50 action or close to it. The house would never want lopsided action on one team. It's just information and angle to consider. JETS JETS JETS!!!
Like I said, this happens more often that not. And it makes sense. The house wants evenly bet matchups. They want 50/50 action or close to it. The house would never want lopsided action on one team. It's just information and angle to consider. JETS JETS JETS!!!
That is why they have a thing called a spread. They dont need the teams to be evenly matched, hence the spread which causes even action.
Like I said, this happens more often that not. And it makes sense. The house wants evenly bet matchups. They want 50/50 action or close to it. The house would never want lopsided action on one team. It's just information and angle to consider. JETS JETS JETS!!!
That is why they have a thing called a spread. They dont need the teams to be evenly matched, hence the spread which causes even action.
You lost me. You take team on MNF ( Hou,Nyj ) and their next game. But then you use Atl and Den which play on Sun previous week. Your situation would hit 1,000,000,000 times in sports betting...lol
You must be consistent in your example.
Look at Chi/Dal on MNF last week. Chi (winner) fading Jax (loser), there is no match there.
You lost me. You take team on MNF ( Hou,Nyj ) and their next game. But then you use Atl and Den which play on Sun previous week. Your situation would hit 1,000,000,000 times in sports betting...lol
You must be consistent in your example.
Look at Chi/Dal on MNF last week. Chi (winner) fading Jax (loser), there is no match there.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.