What im saying is people blindly bet the "public" teams and got lucky this weekend.
Wouldn't it be easier to just pick the games you think offer you the best edge? Forget the whole public teams not covering angle. Do you remember back in 2004 when the Pats, Eagles and Steelers were covering all the time?
The key to these damn spreads is how well the teams play week to week and if some teams are consistently showing up, they will cover the spreads even if they're high.
What im saying is people blindly bet the "public" teams and got lucky this weekend.
Wouldn't it be easier to just pick the games you think offer you the best edge? Forget the whole public teams not covering angle. Do you remember back in 2004 when the Pats, Eagles and Steelers were covering all the time?
The key to these damn spreads is how well the teams play week to week and if some teams are consistently showing up, they will cover the spreads even if they're high.
A friend of mine who never gambles or had an account only plays parlay sheets at work for 20$ hit his 5 games yesterday. It truly was a day for the Joes
A friend of mine who never gambles or had an account only plays parlay sheets at work for 20$ hit his 5 games yesterday. It truly was a day for the Joes
Oh wait... Nyg and Saints were clearly squares... did i miss any?
Can a really good bet be considered square?
The Saints were the right play before the first snap. Sean Payton is dominant at home ATS (13-0 in the last 13 with him as coach). Anyone going with the BIlls out-thought themselves.
Oh wait... Nyg and Saints were clearly squares... did i miss any?
Can a really good bet be considered square?
The Saints were the right play before the first snap. Sean Payton is dominant at home ATS (13-0 in the last 13 with him as coach). Anyone going with the BIlls out-thought themselves.
RexR- Yes, yesterday was the same in college football. Unusual
Been hearing it on several betting podcasts and like....
Vegas is just plain struggling to cap these new spread offense + Changes to rule book to favor offense or "protect players" if thats how you see it........
The ability of a high powered offense to score in under 1 minute has made lines like +4.5 look like dinosaurs......
RexR- Yes, yesterday was the same in college football. Unusual
Been hearing it on several betting podcasts and like....
Vegas is just plain struggling to cap these new spread offense + Changes to rule book to favor offense or "protect players" if thats how you see it........
The ability of a high powered offense to score in under 1 minute has made lines like +4.5 look like dinosaurs......
If Vegas is struggling then it should be pretty easy for us to pick up on the mistakes. I know that I've over thought a few too many games the last week. It may have worked earlier this season but I wish I just made the obvious picks this last weekend. I went 5-10 between College and NFL. Puke!
If Vegas is struggling then it should be pretty easy for us to pick up on the mistakes. I know that I've over thought a few too many games the last week. It may have worked earlier this season but I wish I just made the obvious picks this last weekend. I went 5-10 between College and NFL. Puke!
Simply put there are one or two weekends every season where this happens and this happened to be one. All the popular teams covered. Usually after occurs, within a couple weeks there is a total slaughter of the popular teams. It is just part of the normal cycle.
Simply put there are one or two weekends every season where this happens and this happened to be one. All the popular teams covered. Usually after occurs, within a couple weeks there is a total slaughter of the popular teams. It is just part of the normal cycle.
The Sharps just bet numbers, like Jags +14.5, Dogs at 14.5 have covered 66% of the time since 2003.
Tonight, Seattle -11.5, favorites at -11.5 cover 59% of the time at -12 roughly 30% of the time, the sharps will come in on the Rams at 12 or higher, not because the Rams can win but because of the line. .
Average in some other ATS trends, team trends, box scores and they bet the percentage. If they have 5 picks they only need 3 winners. There's a bit more to it like "buy low and sell high" but that pretty much sums it up.
I think that's where people get all screwed up in the head about "the sharps" they're not some exclusive group like the masons of sports or anything. They usually have the same information as us.
A "sharp" is just a bettor that bets a certain way to try to win one more game than they lose. That's it, they're not some exclusive society that has inside information on games.
The Sharps just bet numbers, like Jags +14.5, Dogs at 14.5 have covered 66% of the time since 2003.
Tonight, Seattle -11.5, favorites at -11.5 cover 59% of the time at -12 roughly 30% of the time, the sharps will come in on the Rams at 12 or higher, not because the Rams can win but because of the line. .
Average in some other ATS trends, team trends, box scores and they bet the percentage. If they have 5 picks they only need 3 winners. There's a bit more to it like "buy low and sell high" but that pretty much sums it up.
I think that's where people get all screwed up in the head about "the sharps" they're not some exclusive group like the masons of sports or anything. They usually have the same information as us.
A "sharp" is just a bettor that bets a certain way to try to win one more game than they lose. That's it, they're not some exclusive society that has inside information on games.
The Sharps just bet numbers, like Jags +14.5, Dogs at 14.5 have covered 66% of the time since 2003.
Tonight, Seattle -11.5, favorites at -11.5 cover 59% of the time at -12 roughly 30% of the time, the sharps will come in on the Rams at 12 or higher, not because the Rams can win but because of the line. .
Average in some other ATS trends, team trends, box scores and they bet the percentage. If they have 5 picks they only need 3 winners. There's a bit more to it like "buy low and sell high" but that pretty much sums it up.
I think that's where people get all screwed up in the head about "the sharps" they're not some exclusive group like the masons of sports or anything. They usually have the same information as us.
A "sharp" is just a bettor that bets a certain way to try to win one more game than they lose. That's it, they're not some exclusive society that has inside information on games.
The Sharps just bet numbers, like Jags +14.5, Dogs at 14.5 have covered 66% of the time since 2003.
Tonight, Seattle -11.5, favorites at -11.5 cover 59% of the time at -12 roughly 30% of the time, the sharps will come in on the Rams at 12 or higher, not because the Rams can win but because of the line. .
Average in some other ATS trends, team trends, box scores and they bet the percentage. If they have 5 picks they only need 3 winners. There's a bit more to it like "buy low and sell high" but that pretty much sums it up.
I think that's where people get all screwed up in the head about "the sharps" they're not some exclusive group like the masons of sports or anything. They usually have the same information as us.
A "sharp" is just a bettor that bets a certain way to try to win one more game than they lose. That's it, they're not some exclusive society that has inside information on games.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.