a little trend that has been happening road teams have been winning 1st games , Minnesota +7.5 buying up to 8 -120 I just think being tested will help, waiting
I have a prop when playoffs started OKC to beat Indiana +5000 now its +220 wow and I have Indiana beating Minny or OKC so 1200+ OKC beats Indiana 550 if Indiana wins wagered 70 just need Indiana to beat NY so really no need to bet Indiana in the series maybe small on NY
onfirmation: 9247136
Date Placed: 05/19/25 08:30:52 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 570.00 win 300.00 Bet Details:
SERIES TOTAL GAMES (PACERS VS KNICKS) 50047 Over over 5½ (-190) risk 570.00 win 300.00 (NBA Playoff Series)
also 2 props I put in May 16th
Confirmation: 9220448
Date Placed: 05/16/25 11:55:37 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 50.00 win 550.00 Bet Details:
NBA FINAL EXACT FORECAST 25077 IND Pacers To Beat OKC Thunder (+1100) risk 50.00 win 550.00 (NBA Final Specials)
Confirmation: 9220448
Date Placed: 05/16/25 11:55:37 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 50.00 win 550.00 Bet Details:
NBA FINAL EXACT FORECAST 25076 IND Pacers To Beat MIN Timberwolves (+1100) risk 50.00 win 550.00 (NBA Final Specials)
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
a little trend that has been happening road teams have been winning 1st games , Minnesota +7.5 buying up to 8 -120 I just think being tested will help, waiting
I have a prop when playoffs started OKC to beat Indiana +5000 now its +220 wow and I have Indiana beating Minny or OKC so 1200+ OKC beats Indiana 550 if Indiana wins wagered 70 just need Indiana to beat NY so really no need to bet Indiana in the series maybe small on NY
onfirmation: 9247136
Date Placed: 05/19/25 08:30:52 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 570.00 win 300.00 Bet Details:
SERIES TOTAL GAMES (PACERS VS KNICKS) 50047 Over over 5½ (-190) risk 570.00 win 300.00 (NBA Playoff Series)
also 2 props I put in May 16th
Confirmation: 9220448
Date Placed: 05/16/25 11:55:37 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 50.00 win 550.00 Bet Details:
NBA FINAL EXACT FORECAST 25077 IND Pacers To Beat OKC Thunder (+1100) risk 50.00 win 550.00 (NBA Final Specials)
Confirmation: 9220448
Date Placed: 05/16/25 11:55:37 Header: INTERNET: Straight Bet risk 50.00 win 550.00 Bet Details:
NBA FINAL EXACT FORECAST 25076 IND Pacers To Beat MIN Timberwolves (+1100) risk 50.00 win 550.00 (NBA Final Specials)
INFO on MINNESOTA/OKC these 2 played 4 times this year splitting 2-2 most games were very close
dec 31 at OKC OKC wins 113-105 innesota won 3 of the 4 quarters....OKC outscored Minn by 20 in 3rd, SAG 40 pts
feb 13 at MINNY MINN wins 116-101 Minn scored 37 1st qtr points to lead 37-24 again Minny won 3 qtrs, holding OKC to 14 4th qtr points, Edwards just 23 pts but Minny had 2 others scoring more than him Reid and Mcdaniels
feb 23 at Minn OKC wins 130-123 again SAG 37 PTS no one else got over 19
Next day Feb 24th at OKC Minnesota wins in OT 131-128 Minnesota was down 22 pts starting the 4th qtr and it went to ot as they outscored OKC 41-19 in the 4th Edwards just 17 pts in 36 mins 3 others had 20+
seems when OKC won SAG was their leading scorers by a lot usually more than double than anyone else, so he will need to have huge games I think, Minnesota seemed to be able to win with Multiple players scoring 20+ meanwhile I do not think Edwards ever scored more than 25 points in any of the games, , these also look like Randle was not there also Naz Reid always scored 19-27 pts and now he is a bench player and also walker was scoring a lot , looks like Minnesota will need to have a few score near 20 and I think if Edwards can just get 25 a game they could do well they had a huge comeback in the 4th, so even if they are down they should feel like they are in it....and looks like OKC may need SAG to have 35+ in games , if he don't they seem to struggle VS minnesota
0
INFO on MINNESOTA/OKC these 2 played 4 times this year splitting 2-2 most games were very close
dec 31 at OKC OKC wins 113-105 innesota won 3 of the 4 quarters....OKC outscored Minn by 20 in 3rd, SAG 40 pts
feb 13 at MINNY MINN wins 116-101 Minn scored 37 1st qtr points to lead 37-24 again Minny won 3 qtrs, holding OKC to 14 4th qtr points, Edwards just 23 pts but Minny had 2 others scoring more than him Reid and Mcdaniels
feb 23 at Minn OKC wins 130-123 again SAG 37 PTS no one else got over 19
Next day Feb 24th at OKC Minnesota wins in OT 131-128 Minnesota was down 22 pts starting the 4th qtr and it went to ot as they outscored OKC 41-19 in the 4th Edwards just 17 pts in 36 mins 3 others had 20+
seems when OKC won SAG was their leading scorers by a lot usually more than double than anyone else, so he will need to have huge games I think, Minnesota seemed to be able to win with Multiple players scoring 20+ meanwhile I do not think Edwards ever scored more than 25 points in any of the games, , these also look like Randle was not there also Naz Reid always scored 19-27 pts and now he is a bench player and also walker was scoring a lot , looks like Minnesota will need to have a few score near 20 and I think if Edwards can just get 25 a game they could do well they had a huge comeback in the 4th, so even if they are down they should feel like they are in it....and looks like OKC may need SAG to have 35+ in games , if he don't they seem to struggle VS minnesota
INFO on MINNESOTA/OKC these 2 played 4 times this year splitting 2-2 most games were very close dec 31 at OKC OKC wins 113-105 innesota won 3 of the 4 quarters....OKC outscored Minn by 20 in 3rd, SAG 40 pts feb 13 at MINNY MINN wins 116-101 Minn scored 37 1st qtr points to lead 37-24 again Minny won 3 qtrs, holding OKC to 14 4th qtr points, Edwards just 23 pts but Minny had 2 others scoring more than him Reid and Mcdaniels feb 23 at Minn OKC wins 130-123 again SAG 37 PTS no one else got over 19 Next day Feb 24th at OKC Minnesota wins in OT 131-128 Minnesota was down 22 pts starting the 4th qtr and it went to ot as they outscored OKC 41-19 in the 4th Edwards just 17 pts in 36 mins 3 others had 20+ seems when OKC won SAG was their leading scorers by a lot usually more than double than anyone else, so he will need to have huge games I think, Minnesota seemed to be able to win with Multiple players scoring 20+ meanwhile I do not think Edwards ever scored more than 25 points in any of the games, , these also look like Randle was not there also Naz Reid always scored 19-27 pts and now he is a bench player and also walker was scoring a lot , looks like Minnesota will need to have a few score near 20 and I think if Edwards can just get 25 a game they could do well they had a huge comeback in the 4th, so even if they are down they should feel like they are in it....and looks like OKC may need SAG to have 35+ in games , if he don't they seem to struggle VS minnesota
@RUM151
Digging into props today. Found it interesting that SGA 9 of 10 games put up 30+ vs Wolves. Edwards hit 30+ only 1 time in ten tries. SGA -210 top scorer in series. I think it’s a dumb line (my opinion) but I’m trying to justify my bet at those larger odds.
Play the game. Don’t let the game play you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RUM151:
INFO on MINNESOTA/OKC these 2 played 4 times this year splitting 2-2 most games were very close dec 31 at OKC OKC wins 113-105 innesota won 3 of the 4 quarters....OKC outscored Minn by 20 in 3rd, SAG 40 pts feb 13 at MINNY MINN wins 116-101 Minn scored 37 1st qtr points to lead 37-24 again Minny won 3 qtrs, holding OKC to 14 4th qtr points, Edwards just 23 pts but Minny had 2 others scoring more than him Reid and Mcdaniels feb 23 at Minn OKC wins 130-123 again SAG 37 PTS no one else got over 19 Next day Feb 24th at OKC Minnesota wins in OT 131-128 Minnesota was down 22 pts starting the 4th qtr and it went to ot as they outscored OKC 41-19 in the 4th Edwards just 17 pts in 36 mins 3 others had 20+ seems when OKC won SAG was their leading scorers by a lot usually more than double than anyone else, so he will need to have huge games I think, Minnesota seemed to be able to win with Multiple players scoring 20+ meanwhile I do not think Edwards ever scored more than 25 points in any of the games, , these also look like Randle was not there also Naz Reid always scored 19-27 pts and now he is a bench player and also walker was scoring a lot , looks like Minnesota will need to have a few score near 20 and I think if Edwards can just get 25 a game they could do well they had a huge comeback in the 4th, so even if they are down they should feel like they are in it....and looks like OKC may need SAG to have 35+ in games , if he don't they seem to struggle VS minnesota
@RUM151
Digging into props today. Found it interesting that SGA 9 of 10 games put up 30+ vs Wolves. Edwards hit 30+ only 1 time in ten tries. SGA -210 top scorer in series. I think it’s a dumb line (my opinion) but I’m trying to justify my bet at those larger odds.
well from what he had to score vs Minnesota this year , that bet seems legit, but if Edwards gets on a run he could put up 30 a game, but I think Minnesota does better when Edwards scores about 22-24 pts, it looks like Reid enjoys playing OKC he did really well in every game this year, and now they have Randle , and even Conley who in the playoffs has only been scoring like 8-10 pts, when they played OKC he was always scoring like 15+ , I think that Minnesota will do well if they can have 4 players avg 16+ a game I do look for McDaniels, Randle, Edwards , and reid to do a load of the scoring, and if Conley can get 8-10 a game they could be really tuff they only play like 8 guys , so staying out of foul trouble will be key
0
@MrFreedo
well from what he had to score vs Minnesota this year , that bet seems legit, but if Edwards gets on a run he could put up 30 a game, but I think Minnesota does better when Edwards scores about 22-24 pts, it looks like Reid enjoys playing OKC he did really well in every game this year, and now they have Randle , and even Conley who in the playoffs has only been scoring like 8-10 pts, when they played OKC he was always scoring like 15+ , I think that Minnesota will do well if they can have 4 players avg 16+ a game I do look for McDaniels, Randle, Edwards , and reid to do a load of the scoring, and if Conley can get 8-10 a game they could be really tuff they only play like 8 guys , so staying out of foul trouble will be key
Good luck Rum…Might have some decent prop bets for scoring with’wolves. Looks like books feel like SGA is going to score a lot also. DK has him at 32+ pts -120 right now
-
0
Good luck Rum…Might have some decent prop bets for scoring with’wolves. Looks like books feel like SGA is going to score a lot also. DK has him at 32+ pts -120 right now
Also any thoughts on points, rebounds, assists totals prop? Edwards and Randall crushed it last series. like the parlay Randall over 30 pra and edwards over 35 and maybe toss in SGA over 30pts. Or over 40 pra for him looks good also. finally I just feel OKC winning in 5, 6 at the most. Minny has come together really well in playoffs and Randall playing out of his mind, but just have feeling bout Thunder and think they are just more talented.
As for the East, I totally forgot Pacers took down the Knicks last year to go to eastern finals. Revenge for Knicks? Seems like such a tough close series. Would like to bet series and finals winner but really wanted your thoughts 1st.
Thanks Rum
-
0
Also any thoughts on points, rebounds, assists totals prop? Edwards and Randall crushed it last series. like the parlay Randall over 30 pra and edwards over 35 and maybe toss in SGA over 30pts. Or over 40 pra for him looks good also. finally I just feel OKC winning in 5, 6 at the most. Minny has come together really well in playoffs and Randall playing out of his mind, but just have feeling bout Thunder and think they are just more talented.
As for the East, I totally forgot Pacers took down the Knicks last year to go to eastern finals. Revenge for Knicks? Seems like such a tough close series. Would like to bet series and finals winner but really wanted your thoughts 1st.
this is a tough one for me, to be honest I thought Indiana could beat Cleveland, I did not have NY beating Boston but I hoped they would, now I am a Knicks and pacers fan, but before the playoffs started I really thought Indiana had a chance to get to the finals, now they are in the eastern finals, right where I had hoped they would be, but I didn't want it against NY...lol I have bets already on Indiana beating Minn or OKC I put those in Friday, now like I posted on my original playoff thread was that I put a future bet in on OKC beating Indiana +5000 for like 25.00 , to be honest I like Indiana to win this series, why I like them is they do not need 1 player to score 35+ a game to win, as where I feel OKC and NY need SAG or Brunson to have big nights , Indiana will have 5 guys score between 15-20 a game , this should be a great series, 7 games most likely....Turner or Siakam vs Towns, and you know Nesmith will be on Brunson, Nembhard vs Hart, I wish Indiana could keep Turner by the rim more, he is a solid shot blocker, I would have Haliburton play Bridges, Haliburton is more of a guard but not sure who is going to play Bridges maybe Mathurin when he is in, I just do not think Haliburton can play Brunson maybe he will , Nesmith is their best defender....going to be interesting to see what they start out with , I hope we do not have blowouts, if we can have games stay within 10 points this will be a great series for prop bets, as you can see I am really divided here still..lol
0
@Fuzzer44
this is a tough one for me, to be honest I thought Indiana could beat Cleveland, I did not have NY beating Boston but I hoped they would, now I am a Knicks and pacers fan, but before the playoffs started I really thought Indiana had a chance to get to the finals, now they are in the eastern finals, right where I had hoped they would be, but I didn't want it against NY...lol I have bets already on Indiana beating Minn or OKC I put those in Friday, now like I posted on my original playoff thread was that I put a future bet in on OKC beating Indiana +5000 for like 25.00 , to be honest I like Indiana to win this series, why I like them is they do not need 1 player to score 35+ a game to win, as where I feel OKC and NY need SAG or Brunson to have big nights , Indiana will have 5 guys score between 15-20 a game , this should be a great series, 7 games most likely....Turner or Siakam vs Towns, and you know Nesmith will be on Brunson, Nembhard vs Hart, I wish Indiana could keep Turner by the rim more, he is a solid shot blocker, I would have Haliburton play Bridges, Haliburton is more of a guard but not sure who is going to play Bridges maybe Mathurin when he is in, I just do not think Haliburton can play Brunson maybe he will , Nesmith is their best defender....going to be interesting to see what they start out with , I hope we do not have blowouts, if we can have games stay within 10 points this will be a great series for prop bets, as you can see I am really divided here still..lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.