Recent Meetings | |||||||
Mar | Away FG | Reb | |||||
11/21/08 | LAL 104 - DEN 90 | LAL -8.5 | U 205 | 5.5 | 41/84 | 36/84 | 43-39 |
11/01/08 | DEN 97 - LAL 104 | DEN 8.5 | U 210.5 | 1.5 | 34/74 | 33/87 | 38-53 |
04/28/08 | DEN 101 - LAL 107 | LAL -4.0 | U 225 | 2.0 | 39/88 | 40/87 | 50-45 |
04/26/08 | DEN 84 - LAL 102 | LAL 1.5 | U 230 | 19.5 | 32/86 | 37/80 | 53-39 |
04/23/08 | LAL 122 - DEN 107 | LAL -8.5 | U 230 | 6.5 | 46/91 | 37/84 | 41-45 |
04/20/08 | LAL 128 - DEN 114 | LAL -8.5 | O 224.5 | 5.5 | 46/92 | 43/96 | 45-47 |
01/21/08 | LAL 116 - DEN 99 | LAL -3.5 | U 226 | 13.5 | 40/84 | 39/87 | 45-45 |
12/05/07 | DEN 107 - LAL 111 | LAL 9.0 | U 220.5 | 13.0 | 36/80 | 40/84 | 47-43 |
11/29/07 | LAL 127 - DEN 99 | LAL -5 | O 219 | 23.0 | 48/95 | 40/90 | 52-41 |
04/09/07 | DEN 115 - LAL 111 | LAL 6.5 | O 216 | 2.5 | 35/78 | 41/94 | 49-39 |
Recent Meetings | |||||||
Mar | Away FG | Reb | |||||
11/21/08 | LAL 104 - DEN 90 | LAL -8.5 | U 205 | 5.5 | 41/84 | 36/84 | 43-39 |
11/01/08 | DEN 97 - LAL 104 | DEN 8.5 | U 210.5 | 1.5 | 34/74 | 33/87 | 38-53 |
04/28/08 | DEN 101 - LAL 107 | LAL -4.0 | U 225 | 2.0 | 39/88 | 40/87 | 50-45 |
04/26/08 | DEN 84 - LAL 102 | LAL 1.5 | U 230 | 19.5 | 32/86 | 37/80 | 53-39 |
04/23/08 | LAL 122 - DEN 107 | LAL -8.5 | U 230 | 6.5 | 46/91 | 37/84 | 41-45 |
04/20/08 | LAL 128 - DEN 114 | LAL -8.5 | O 224.5 | 5.5 | 46/92 | 43/96 | 45-47 |
01/21/08 | LAL 116 - DEN 99 | LAL -3.5 | U 226 | 13.5 | 40/84 | 39/87 | 45-45 |
12/05/07 | DEN 107 - LAL 111 | LAL 9.0 | U 220.5 | 13.0 | 36/80 | 40/84 | 47-43 |
11/29/07 | LAL 127 - DEN 99 | LAL -5 | O 219 | 23.0 | 48/95 | 40/90 | 52-41 |
04/09/07 | DEN 115 - LAL 111 | LAL 6.5 | O 216 | 2.5 | 35/78 | 41/94 | 49-39 |
Recent Meetings | |||||||
Mar | Away FG | Reb | |||||
11/21/08 | LAL 104 - DEN 90 | LAL -8.5 | U 205 | 5.5 | 41/84 | 36/84 | 43-39 |
11/01/08 | DEN 97 - LAL 104 | DEN 8.5 | U 210.5 | 1.5 | 34/74 | 33/87 | 38-53 |
04/28/08 | DEN 101 - LAL 107 | LAL -4.0 | U 225 | 2.0 | 39/88 | 40/87 | 50-45 |
04/26/08 | DEN 84 - LAL 102 | LAL 1.5 | U 230 | 19.5 | 32/86 | 37/80 | 53-39 |
04/23/08 | LAL 122 - DEN 107 | LAL -8.5 | U 230 | 6.5 | 46/91 | 37/84 | 41-45 |
04/20/08 | LAL 128 - DEN 114 | LAL -8.5 | O 224.5 | 5.5 | 46/92 | 43/96 | 45-47 |
01/21/08 | LAL 116 - DEN 99 | LAL -3.5 | U 226 | 13.5 | 40/84 | 39/87 | 45-45 |
12/05/07 | DEN 107 - LAL 111 | LAL 9.0 | U 220.5 | 13.0 | 36/80 | 40/84 | 47-43 |
11/29/07 | LAL 127 - DEN 99 | LAL -5 | O 219 | 23.0 | 48/95 | 40/90 | 52-41 |
04/09/07 | DEN 115 - LAL 111 | LAL 6.5 | O 216 | 2.5 | 35/78 | 41/94 | 49-39 |
Recent Meetings | |||||||
Mar | Away FG | Reb | |||||
11/21/08 | LAL 104 - DEN 90 | LAL -8.5 | U 205 | 5.5 | 41/84 | 36/84 | 43-39 |
11/01/08 | DEN 97 - LAL 104 | DEN 8.5 | U 210.5 | 1.5 | 34/74 | 33/87 | 38-53 |
04/28/08 | DEN 101 - LAL 107 | LAL -4.0 | U 225 | 2.0 | 39/88 | 40/87 | 50-45 |
04/26/08 | DEN 84 - LAL 102 | LAL 1.5 | U 230 | 19.5 | 32/86 | 37/80 | 53-39 |
04/23/08 | LAL 122 - DEN 107 | LAL -8.5 | U 230 | 6.5 | 46/91 | 37/84 | 41-45 |
04/20/08 | LAL 128 - DEN 114 | LAL -8.5 | O 224.5 | 5.5 | 46/92 | 43/96 | 45-47 |
01/21/08 | LAL 116 - DEN 99 | LAL -3.5 | U 226 | 13.5 | 40/84 | 39/87 | 45-45 |
12/05/07 | DEN 107 - LAL 111 | LAL 9.0 | U 220.5 | 13.0 | 36/80 | 40/84 | 47-43 |
11/29/07 | LAL 127 - DEN 99 | LAL -5 | O 219 | 23.0 | 48/95 | 40/90 | 52-41 |
04/09/07 | DEN 115 - LAL 111 | LAL 6.5 | O 216 | 2.5 | 35/78 | 41/94 | 49-39 |
phoenix shot poorly last night.. if they wouldve a higher shooting percentage the game would have been closer. im looking for denver to make more shots that phoenix hit last night. i think the lakers will have an off night. they will shoot poorly tonite. thats the only way denver covers. and i think that might just happen tonite. im new to this fellas. but i hope this will tell you guys that im for real!
phoenix shot poorly last night.. if they wouldve a higher shooting percentage the game would have been closer. im looking for denver to make more shots that phoenix hit last night. i think the lakers will have an off night. they will shoot poorly tonite. thats the only way denver covers. and i think that might just happen tonite. im new to this fellas. but i hope this will tell you guys that im for real!
I wouldn't be putting the Lakers on upset alert right now. This isn't college hoops. I know it's trendy to go against the grain/public and pick the home dog here, but in this case the Lakers are head and shoulders the far superior team. Denver has had a long list of no-shows this year at home to elite teams, why should we be betting that tonight is the night it stops? I'm not.
And don't compare the Cavs and Celtics losing this week to the Lakers because LA handily beat both those teams TWICE this season already.
I wouldn't be putting the Lakers on upset alert right now. This isn't college hoops. I know it's trendy to go against the grain/public and pick the home dog here, but in this case the Lakers are head and shoulders the far superior team. Denver has had a long list of no-shows this year at home to elite teams, why should we be betting that tonight is the night it stops? I'm not.
And don't compare the Cavs and Celtics losing this week to the Lakers because LA handily beat both those teams TWICE this season already.
Public could be wrong on this one,
but we're talking L AKER$ here.
Lately I've been winning with 2h plays.
For example: Wednesday night, took Magic ML and not NYK +3.5. With NYK down 14 at the half, I checked the 2h line & I took NYK -2.5 > giving me NYK +11.5 for the game. Final score :114 -109 > Won both of them, but would've lost taking 'em +3.5 for the game.
Doesn't always work, but waiting for 2h play can add points in your favor if team is down at the half.
I'll wait for 2H play on denver if tied or down at the half, hopefully no more than 8 points.
Those of you like -2.5, could be down 1 - 4 points at the half.
If so will have a chance at 2h comeback, at maybe -3 or 4, but many will be chasing
and result can end up = HOME WIN > PUBLIC LOSS.
See what happens
Public could be wrong on this one,
but we're talking L AKER$ here.
Lately I've been winning with 2h plays.
For example: Wednesday night, took Magic ML and not NYK +3.5. With NYK down 14 at the half, I checked the 2h line & I took NYK -2.5 > giving me NYK +11.5 for the game. Final score :114 -109 > Won both of them, but would've lost taking 'em +3.5 for the game.
Doesn't always work, but waiting for 2h play can add points in your favor if team is down at the half.
I'll wait for 2H play on denver if tied or down at the half, hopefully no more than 8 points.
Those of you like -2.5, could be down 1 - 4 points at the half.
If so will have a chance at 2h comeback, at maybe -3 or 4, but many will be chasing
and result can end up = HOME WIN > PUBLIC LOSS.
See what happens
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.