*simply looking at how far off the oddsmakers have been..........theoretically
meaning not an absolute science...but better used
to indicate or suggest......a mistake > that can
give us an edge
*all have played at least 2 games....and are 2-0 ATS or 0-2 ATS
*keeping in mind you have to factor in the other team also when drawing conclusions
eg. San Diego St has COVERED their 2 games by 35 points...or 17.5 pts/g.........
While Houston has MISSED the cover by only 57 points...or 28.5/g...............
sure I missed a couple...most are there
POSITIVE
-
35 San Diego St
33 Purdue
31 Texas Tech
SJose St
28 Utah St
Miss St
23 Iowa St
21 Fresno
UCF
20 UCLA
19 ULA
16 UConn
13 Ole Miss
12 WKU
11 N Ill
Ga Tech
10 Ball St
Ohio
9 Toledo
NEGATIVE
57 Houston
54 Ark
50 Pitt
45 Wisky
41 UMass
38 FIU
37 CMIch
35 Col
31 Cal
OREGON
29 MICHIGAN
EMIch
24 Rutgers
23 MIa,O
21 Washington
Wazzu
20 Va Tech
Auburn
19 S Ala
16 USC
15 Kansas
13 Iowa
11 NC St
9 Utah
"SO.....YOU'RE TELLING ME ALL I HAVE TO DO IS BET UCLA (+10/GAME).....VS HOUSTON (-28.5/G) ??
*er.......no.....more like if you happen to like Houston here.......better tap (no maybe slam) on the brakes and re-evaluate things.......or if on the fence...strongly consider the Bruins.....
Few things to consider....
*Will the trend continue?....or reverse itself week 3?
*Will the oddsmakers catch-up? > and make an accurate adjustment?.....or over-adjust? .....