i have them at over 10 wins this year so i'm with you guys... however, lets see how they do against a real team (non 1AA) before we start jerking each other off.
i have them at over 10 wins this year so i'm with you guys... however, lets see how they do against a real team (non 1AA) before we start jerking each other off.
Wake has won 2 or the last 3 at FSU. This could be looking ahead with Clemson on deck. Wake could get the back door cover let alone be in the game at the end.
Wake has won 2 or the last 3 at FSU. This could be looking ahead with Clemson on deck. Wake could get the back door cover let alone be in the game at the end.
FSU looks like a Top 5 team every year. And then they get exposed.
Like last year they still have a one dimensional QB.....and that's not necessarily a bad thing if the QB can throw. Manuel is one dimensional and he can't throw.
Be careful with Wake. Their coaches are crafty. FSU coaches are more the "big southern dummy" types..
FSU looks like a Top 5 team every year. And then they get exposed.
Like last year they still have a one dimensional QB.....and that's not necessarily a bad thing if the QB can throw. Manuel is one dimensional and he can't throw.
Be careful with Wake. Their coaches are crafty. FSU coaches are more the "big southern dummy" types..
PAY KTRAIN THE $100 YOU ROBBED FROM HIM. THIS DEGENERATE STOLE MONEY FROM A FELLOW COVERS MEMBER FOR A FAKE FANTASY LEAGUE AND STILL PRETENDS HE HAS MONEY TO BET.
PAY KTRAIN THE $100 YOU ROBBED FROM HIM. THIS DEGENERATE STOLE MONEY FROM A FELLOW COVERS MEMBER FOR A FAKE FANTASY LEAGUE AND STILL PRETENDS HE HAS MONEY TO BET.
No shit FSU won't lose to WF at home. The question is the spread. Wake always brings it against FSU. Look what happened to Clemson last week. 45-10 at the half and they fail to cover the 27.5 points.
No shit FSU won't lose to WF at home. The question is the spread. Wake always brings it against FSU. Look what happened to Clemson last week. 45-10 at the half and they fail to cover the 27.5 points.
They look like a top 5 team to me, if they get by clemson which i think they do they wont lose a game
usc/oregon beat up on each other
i think usc loses this weekend
lsu/bama beat up on each other
and play each other
I think fsu+900 is awsome odds for that schedule
You're an idiot, a liar, and a thief. Stop posting on this site. Why do you even bother. Every time you make a thread on here, you get a half dozen people calling you scum and pointing out what a piece of shit human being you are.
Why keep doing it? Do you like the abuse? Does it remind you of your childhood? That's the only thing I can think of. Especially since once you are called out on your bull shit, you disappear like the coward, punk ass bitch that you are.
Stop posting on here because everyone knows that you aren't making any bets. If you had the money to do that, you wouldn't be ripping people off over a hundred dollars.
They look like a top 5 team to me, if they get by clemson which i think they do they wont lose a game
usc/oregon beat up on each other
i think usc loses this weekend
lsu/bama beat up on each other
and play each other
I think fsu+900 is awsome odds for that schedule
You're an idiot, a liar, and a thief. Stop posting on this site. Why do you even bother. Every time you make a thread on here, you get a half dozen people calling you scum and pointing out what a piece of shit human being you are.
Why keep doing it? Do you like the abuse? Does it remind you of your childhood? That's the only thing I can think of. Especially since once you are called out on your bull shit, you disappear like the coward, punk ass bitch that you are.
Stop posting on here because everyone knows that you aren't making any bets. If you had the money to do that, you wouldn't be ripping people off over a hundred dollars.
USC will roll this week end--- and then maybe--just maybe lose to oregon
What makes you so sure? They didn't come close to covering against Syracuse or Hawaii. I think SC wins, but they won't be running away with anything. SC is good, but solidly overrated. Syracuse was in the game late and had no problem moving the ball at times against SC's secondary.
USC will roll this week end--- and then maybe--just maybe lose to oregon
What makes you so sure? They didn't come close to covering against Syracuse or Hawaii. I think SC wins, but they won't be running away with anything. SC is good, but solidly overrated. Syracuse was in the game late and had no problem moving the ball at times against SC's secondary.
What makes you so sure? They didn't come close to covering against Syracuse or Hawaii. I think SC wins, but they won't be running away with anything. SC is good, but solidly overrated. Syracuse was in the game late and had no problem moving the ball at times against SC's secondary.
just seem that u watched the games but didnt payed attention on them ... USC erased Hawaii on the 1st half, even with all the 2pt conv bullshit and , then just toyed around with them...same thing with syracuse... kiffin going in 4th and short every single time he could..and yet the orange didnt had what it takes to take advantage...after the long break syracuse came roaring, and USC came out lazy, not even trying and yet they scored 21 pts on the 4thqrt and just put the orange to sleep ..... if theres a team ive been following really close aside Boise is stanford... USC was sleepwalking againts hawaii and syr cus they dont give a shiet on giving 100% effort on them.. the trojans have their eyes fixed in stanford and oregon ... stanford was exposed by sjst and then rebounded like i expected against a duke team that has been dominated by the tree as of late .... but stanford has many young new players, and cant power run effectively, the QB is average , still raw, what saves stanford is the coaching and that they have still good athletes but the tree lack of depth, USC has way too much speed and is way more physical and have depth this year stanford team will struggle huge against more physicall faster teams-- fopr me this year stanford schedule will be as following
USC will destroy them, the Washington and AZ games will be close games the tree might end up losing one , theres a high chance ND win and then stanford bounce back against a week ass Cal team, then they should win against WASU , destroy colorado ,lose to ORST, and get destroyed again by Oregon and UCLA on a mop up job
on the other side
USC destroys stanford in a vengeance,obliterate Cal..a la hawaii,win by dd against utah and wash syracuse style,then obliterate colorado a la hawaii..again, then again have a syracuse win ina shoot out against AZ with a look ahead,---- then a close win over Oregon, a not so comfortable win over AST becuse they will be physically gassed after the game against oregon, then a DD win over UCLA and ND---
What makes you so sure? They didn't come close to covering against Syracuse or Hawaii. I think SC wins, but they won't be running away with anything. SC is good, but solidly overrated. Syracuse was in the game late and had no problem moving the ball at times against SC's secondary.
just seem that u watched the games but didnt payed attention on them ... USC erased Hawaii on the 1st half, even with all the 2pt conv bullshit and , then just toyed around with them...same thing with syracuse... kiffin going in 4th and short every single time he could..and yet the orange didnt had what it takes to take advantage...after the long break syracuse came roaring, and USC came out lazy, not even trying and yet they scored 21 pts on the 4thqrt and just put the orange to sleep ..... if theres a team ive been following really close aside Boise is stanford... USC was sleepwalking againts hawaii and syr cus they dont give a shiet on giving 100% effort on them.. the trojans have their eyes fixed in stanford and oregon ... stanford was exposed by sjst and then rebounded like i expected against a duke team that has been dominated by the tree as of late .... but stanford has many young new players, and cant power run effectively, the QB is average , still raw, what saves stanford is the coaching and that they have still good athletes but the tree lack of depth, USC has way too much speed and is way more physical and have depth this year stanford team will struggle huge against more physicall faster teams-- fopr me this year stanford schedule will be as following
USC will destroy them, the Washington and AZ games will be close games the tree might end up losing one , theres a high chance ND win and then stanford bounce back against a week ass Cal team, then they should win against WASU , destroy colorado ,lose to ORST, and get destroyed again by Oregon and UCLA on a mop up job
on the other side
USC destroys stanford in a vengeance,obliterate Cal..a la hawaii,win by dd against utah and wash syracuse style,then obliterate colorado a la hawaii..again, then again have a syracuse win ina shoot out against AZ with a look ahead,---- then a close win over Oregon, a not so comfortable win over AST becuse they will be physically gassed after the game against oregon, then a DD win over UCLA and ND---
just seem that u watched the games but didnt payed attention on them ... USC erased Hawaii on the 1st half, even with all the 2pt conv bullshit and , then just toyed around with them...same thing with syracuse... kiffin going in 4th and short every single time he could..and yet the orange didnt had what it takes to take advantage...after the long break syracuse came roaring, and USC came out lazy, not even trying and yet they scored 21 pts on the 4thqrt and just put the orange to sleep ..... if theres a team ive been following really close aside Boise is stanford... USC was sleepwalking againts hawaii and syr cus they dont give a shiet on giving 100% effort on them.. the trojans have their eyes fixed in stanford and oregon ... stanford was exposed by sjst and then rebounded like i expected against a duke team that has been dominated by the tree as of late .... but stanford has many young new players, and cant power run effectively, the QB is average , still raw, what saves stanford is the coaching and that they have still good athletes but the tree lack of depth, USC has way too much speed and is way more physical and have depth this year stanford team will struggle huge against more physicall faster teams-- fopr me this year stanford schedule will be as following
USC will destroy them, the Washington and AZ games will be close games the tree might end up losing one , theres a high chance ND win and then stanford bounce back against a week ass Cal team, then they should win against WASU , destroy colorado ,lose to ORST, and get destroyed again by Oregon and UCLA on a mop up job
on the other side
USC destroys stanford in a vengeance,obliterate Cal..a la hawaii,win by dd against utah and wash syracuse style,then obliterate colorado a la hawaii..again, then again have a syracuse win ina shoot out against AZ with a look ahead,---- then a close win over Oregon, a not so comfortable win over AST becuse they will be physically gassed after the game against oregon, then a DD win over UCLA and ND---
Oh, I PAID attention. SC got stuffed on multiple 4th downs in the first half. SC was only up 11 heading into the half. If you want to back an 0-2 ATS team, who by your own admission turns it on and off, be my guest. Until they prove to me that they can play a full 4 quarters of football like an Alabama, I can't wager on them. I don't back teams that are "lazy." No play for me. BOL with your pick.
just seem that u watched the games but didnt payed attention on them ... USC erased Hawaii on the 1st half, even with all the 2pt conv bullshit and , then just toyed around with them...same thing with syracuse... kiffin going in 4th and short every single time he could..and yet the orange didnt had what it takes to take advantage...after the long break syracuse came roaring, and USC came out lazy, not even trying and yet they scored 21 pts on the 4thqrt and just put the orange to sleep ..... if theres a team ive been following really close aside Boise is stanford... USC was sleepwalking againts hawaii and syr cus they dont give a shiet on giving 100% effort on them.. the trojans have their eyes fixed in stanford and oregon ... stanford was exposed by sjst and then rebounded like i expected against a duke team that has been dominated by the tree as of late .... but stanford has many young new players, and cant power run effectively, the QB is average , still raw, what saves stanford is the coaching and that they have still good athletes but the tree lack of depth, USC has way too much speed and is way more physical and have depth this year stanford team will struggle huge against more physicall faster teams-- fopr me this year stanford schedule will be as following
USC will destroy them, the Washington and AZ games will be close games the tree might end up losing one , theres a high chance ND win and then stanford bounce back against a week ass Cal team, then they should win against WASU , destroy colorado ,lose to ORST, and get destroyed again by Oregon and UCLA on a mop up job
on the other side
USC destroys stanford in a vengeance,obliterate Cal..a la hawaii,win by dd against utah and wash syracuse style,then obliterate colorado a la hawaii..again, then again have a syracuse win ina shoot out against AZ with a look ahead,---- then a close win over Oregon, a not so comfortable win over AST becuse they will be physically gassed after the game against oregon, then a DD win over UCLA and ND---
Oh, I PAID attention. SC got stuffed on multiple 4th downs in the first half. SC was only up 11 heading into the half. If you want to back an 0-2 ATS team, who by your own admission turns it on and off, be my guest. Until they prove to me that they can play a full 4 quarters of football like an Alabama, I can't wager on them. I don't back teams that are "lazy." No play for me. BOL with your pick.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.