I dunno about you.... but i saw a nicely coached team with a great game plan bombard a much better team to stay in the game.....
Once they got their footing it was all over. I'll give props to Gus and the crew as they came in with a plan to try to expose FSU. It almostworked. But FSU was the better team.... that was evident in the 2nd half of that game.... you can see the talent disparity.....
There's not doubt that Gus Malzahn came up with a game plan that was brilliant.
I dunno about you.... but i saw a nicely coached team with a great game plan bombard a much better team to stay in the game.....
Once they got their footing it was all over. I'll give props to Gus and the crew as they came in with a plan to try to expose FSU. It almostworked. But FSU was the better team.... that was evident in the 2nd half of that game.... you can see the talent disparity.....
There's not doubt that Gus Malzahn came up with a game plan that was brilliant.
I dunno about you.... but i saw a nicely coached team with a great game plan bombard a much better team to stay in the game.....
Once they got their footing it was all over. I'll give props to Gus and the crew as they came in with a plan to try to expose FSU. It almostworked. But FSU was the better team.... that was evident in the 2nd half of that game.... you can see the talent disparity.....
There's not doubt that Gus Malzahn came up with a game plan that was brilliant.
Please - FSU was a much better team? You have got to be kidding - they won the game by 3 points - in the last 13 seconds! And Auburn's brilliant gameplan kept them in the game? Ridiculous.
You have got to be kidding. Auburn did in this game exactly what it did all year long - run the football off 4 or 5 base plays from a two back set. If anything, they were even more conservative in the BCS game than in their normal offense - they never ran the wheel route once in the game - a play they had great success with during the year; and they rarely ran the speed sweep they normally run a lot due I am sure to FSU's lateral speed defensively. Auburn was very vanilla offensively, running the ball in the middle of the field over 60 per cent of the time.
Still, AU whipped FSU every way you could do so except on the scoreboard. AU dominated FSU in rushing offense; time of possession; total offense and first downs. The teams were even in turnovers, and in pasing offense, FSU only had 20 yards more in passing than Auburn - a negligible amount. FSU had to resort to a very risky fake punt on their own side of the 50 to avoid getting blown out, and a 100 yard kick return on a blown special teams coverage, or else they lose the game. Period. Auburn was the better team that night, but as we know, the better team does not always win.
I dunno about you.... but i saw a nicely coached team with a great game plan bombard a much better team to stay in the game.....
Once they got their footing it was all over. I'll give props to Gus and the crew as they came in with a plan to try to expose FSU. It almostworked. But FSU was the better team.... that was evident in the 2nd half of that game.... you can see the talent disparity.....
There's not doubt that Gus Malzahn came up with a game plan that was brilliant.
Please - FSU was a much better team? You have got to be kidding - they won the game by 3 points - in the last 13 seconds! And Auburn's brilliant gameplan kept them in the game? Ridiculous.
You have got to be kidding. Auburn did in this game exactly what it did all year long - run the football off 4 or 5 base plays from a two back set. If anything, they were even more conservative in the BCS game than in their normal offense - they never ran the wheel route once in the game - a play they had great success with during the year; and they rarely ran the speed sweep they normally run a lot due I am sure to FSU's lateral speed defensively. Auburn was very vanilla offensively, running the ball in the middle of the field over 60 per cent of the time.
Still, AU whipped FSU every way you could do so except on the scoreboard. AU dominated FSU in rushing offense; time of possession; total offense and first downs. The teams were even in turnovers, and in pasing offense, FSU only had 20 yards more in passing than Auburn - a negligible amount. FSU had to resort to a very risky fake punt on their own side of the 50 to avoid getting blown out, and a 100 yard kick return on a blown special teams coverage, or else they lose the game. Period. Auburn was the better team that night, but as we know, the better team does not always win.
...And now toward your comparisons of Robinson, Cam Erving, and Timmy J. Again, it's nitpicking. They are all elite prospects likely to be taken in the first round (I'd be willing to make a $100 PayPal wager with you that Timmy J is selected before Robinson).
Okay Di!psh!t Dokie - there it is, you're own offer of wager that Timmy Jernigan would be taken over Greg Robinson in the draft. This was after you said no Auburn player would even be able to start on FSU last year, and I told you Greg Robinson would eat Jernigan, Cam Erving, and anyone else on their roster for breakfast. Result: Greg Robinson taken no. 2 overall in the 1st Round; Timmy J. at no. 48 in the 2nd round. I wouldn't call that 'nitpicking'. Todd McShay calls Robinson the most dominating player at the point of attack that he has 'ever' evaluated. In eight drafts. That is not 'nitpicking.'
Hell, even Auburn DE Dee Ford was taken no. 23 in the first round, 25 spots ahead of Timmy. So I'll be waiting with baited breath for my $100, though I know your type too well - in addition to general clueless homerism as regards to CFB you also will welch on your wagers ...
...And now toward your comparisons of Robinson, Cam Erving, and Timmy J. Again, it's nitpicking. They are all elite prospects likely to be taken in the first round (I'd be willing to make a $100 PayPal wager with you that Timmy J is selected before Robinson).
Okay Di!psh!t Dokie - there it is, you're own offer of wager that Timmy Jernigan would be taken over Greg Robinson in the draft. This was after you said no Auburn player would even be able to start on FSU last year, and I told you Greg Robinson would eat Jernigan, Cam Erving, and anyone else on their roster for breakfast. Result: Greg Robinson taken no. 2 overall in the 1st Round; Timmy J. at no. 48 in the 2nd round. I wouldn't call that 'nitpicking'. Todd McShay calls Robinson the most dominating player at the point of attack that he has 'ever' evaluated. In eight drafts. That is not 'nitpicking.'
Hell, even Auburn DE Dee Ford was taken no. 23 in the first round, 25 spots ahead of Timmy. So I'll be waiting with baited breath for my $100, though I know your type too well - in addition to general clueless homerism as regards to CFB you also will welch on your wagers ...
Did he really post this after predicting a worst case scenario of 42-24, and a best case scenario of 55-13?
You gotta have zero integrity to talk garbage after the predictions and breakdown, in a game where FSU didn't spend a single second of the game covering the spread! In fact, they didn't spend a single second of the game covering on a teaser!
Auburn was a gimme and for those of us who bet them, we sat back and enjoyed every minute of it!
Did he really post this after predicting a worst case scenario of 42-24, and a best case scenario of 55-13?
You gotta have zero integrity to talk garbage after the predictions and breakdown, in a game where FSU didn't spend a single second of the game covering the spread! In fact, they didn't spend a single second of the game covering on a teaser!
Auburn was a gimme and for those of us who bet them, we sat back and enjoyed every minute of it!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.