Notre Dame is better than Minnesota. Who they beat. I would argue the home loss to Minnesota is Purdue's only "bad loss" of the year so far.
That's a valid point but Wisky is a notch above ND. And many here would agree with that. And they were only laying -2.5 to ND at home. And that game was very very tight. And to be laying -3 to Wisky in what again should be a very tight game Purdue MUST win by 4 to cover? I'll take the other side and look to 5 returning starters to validate this team's national championship aspirations. And a win here will do that. Very big spot for Wisky (and Purdue). But I'll take the points.
Notre Dame is better than Minnesota. Who they beat. I would argue the home loss to Minnesota is Purdue's only "bad loss" of the year so far.
That's a valid point but Wisky is a notch above ND. And many here would agree with that. And they were only laying -2.5 to ND at home. And that game was very very tight. And to be laying -3 to Wisky in what again should be a very tight game Purdue MUST win by 4 to cover? I'll take the other side and look to 5 returning starters to validate this team's national championship aspirations. And a win here will do that. Very big spot for Wisky (and Purdue). But I'll take the points.
Notre Dame is better than Minnesota. Who they beat. I would argue the home loss to Minnesota is Purdue's only "bad loss" of the year so far.
Wisky is a notch above Notre Dame. This win will solidify tournament aspirations both conference and NCAA. And I get points. I'd rather get than on the road than need to win by 4 or even 5 at home because this line would be -3 or -4 in Wisky. That's asking a lot on their home floor. I'll take the road spot and the points.
Notre Dame is better than Minnesota. Who they beat. I would argue the home loss to Minnesota is Purdue's only "bad loss" of the year so far.
Wisky is a notch above Notre Dame. This win will solidify tournament aspirations both conference and NCAA. And I get points. I'd rather get than on the road than need to win by 4 or even 5 at home because this line would be -3 or -4 in Wisky. That's asking a lot on their home floor. I'll take the road spot and the points.
As is the case in every Purdue game Pendo. And they are 0-3 against the best of who they faced Villanova Lousiville and Minnesota.
Purdue had Villanova beat the whole game and only lost because Villanova got lucky.
Louisville got all the calls, and the Refs took Caleb out early with ticky-tack fouls on him, while the Cards were allow to foul him with the only 4 slap-downs called when they HAD to call the obvious fouls on him.
Purdue is better in many more areas that count than Wisky.
As is the case in every Purdue game Pendo. And they are 0-3 against the best of who they faced Villanova Lousiville and Minnesota.
Purdue had Villanova beat the whole game and only lost because Villanova got lucky.
Louisville got all the calls, and the Refs took Caleb out early with ticky-tack fouls on him, while the Cards were allow to foul him with the only 4 slap-downs called when they HAD to call the obvious fouls on him.
Purdue is better in many more areas that count than Wisky.
It was actually a neutral site game. Part of the Crossroads Classic.
Wow. Then that line translates to ND +6 at Purdue. Not a line is want to be laying against Notre Dame. No matter. They ultimately covered so I'll give th them that.
All valid points if that's how you see those games Pendo. Ultimately I see 3 as attractive. Purdue must win by 4 to cover.
It was actually a neutral site game. Part of the Crossroads Classic.
Wow. Then that line translates to ND +6 at Purdue. Not a line is want to be laying against Notre Dame. No matter. They ultimately covered so I'll give th them that.
All valid points if that's how you see those games Pendo. Ultimately I see 3 as attractive. Purdue must win by 4 to cover.
Badgers: Koening made 41 @ 38% clip Trice made 19 @ 54%
Boilermakers: Dakota Mathias made 35 at nearly 50% P.J. Thompson made 28 at 42% Vincent Edwards made 26 at 45% Carsen Edwards made 23 at 35% Ryan Cline has made 23 at 46%
Badgers: Koening made 41 @ 38% clip Trice made 19 @ 54%
Boilermakers: Dakota Mathias made 35 at nearly 50% P.J. Thompson made 28 at 42% Vincent Edwards made 26 at 45% Carsen Edwards made 23 at 35% Ryan Cline has made 23 at 46%
Purdue's super high 3pt %ages are from feeds via the in&out dish - doubling down on Caleb, and then great finds for open-looks... Happ & hayes will BOTH need to turn in their best games to give the slower Wisky any chance to not lose by seven or more.
Purdue's super high 3pt %ages are from feeds via the in&out dish - doubling down on Caleb, and then great finds for open-looks... Happ & hayes will BOTH need to turn in their best games to give the slower Wisky any chance to not lose by seven or more.
I NEED A JOB LIKE YOU PEOPLE.... ALL TE FREE TIME IN THE WORLD..... THIS IS LIKE TRANSCRIPTS FROM A COURT CASE... (TOM JACKSON VOICE) " CMON MAN"
Have a job BigDude. This actually provides a very necessary distraction.
The trolls are the ones you need to really shake down in terms of where they get their free time. "Reporting back to higher ups" on a capping website about an anonymous poster.....now that's some free time right there.
Wow Pendo you think they'll blow them out? 7 or more even with best games from two of their starters? Not me. BOL.
I NEED A JOB LIKE YOU PEOPLE.... ALL TE FREE TIME IN THE WORLD..... THIS IS LIKE TRANSCRIPTS FROM A COURT CASE... (TOM JACKSON VOICE) " CMON MAN"
Have a job BigDude. This actually provides a very necessary distraction.
The trolls are the ones you need to really shake down in terms of where they get their free time. "Reporting back to higher ups" on a capping website about an anonymous poster.....now that's some free time right there.
Wow Pendo you think they'll blow them out? 7 or more even with best games from two of their starters? Not me. BOL.
Me again. Last message - sorry to keep bothering you - but TRUST ME - come meet me in NYC.
Some thoughts:
1. Why do you waste SO MUCH TIME answering trolls with paragraphs - do you have INFINITE TIME? The sharps are making GAZILLIONS capping games, betting sites, finding spots to bet - and you are WASTING TIME trying to answer trolls. Why???? I am making money tailing picks etc and you waste time?
2. You are WRONG (in old thread) to say poker is more gamble than sports. Read the United States vs Lawrence Dicrista case in NY State (2012 case) - it has great math showing poker skill/luck and obvious less random than sports. It is 50ish page case file - easy to find b/c of Freedom of Information Act
3. You are WRONG to say that a poker play will do anything that is positive EV. Any smart finance guy will tell you that UTILITY = EV - Sigma ^2 * constant K - other costs. So when you increase variance (sigma square) and if you personally have high constant you don't always have to do EV positive stuff. Ex: Let's say my net worth is $1million. Gates offers to flip a coin for $1m but coin lands on heads 55% of time - and he asks me to play. My EV is positive but the sigma squared is SO big it is NOT worth me to do. In fact i should be willing to pay some money to NOT do it if forced to do it. Most sports gamblers nad poker players don't understnad this concept.
4. Do you know sports books are less than 5% of profits of casinos so you aren't going to crush Steve Wynn as long as he has penny slots (30%+ of profits). I appreciate you trying to help your mom etc but I think getting a cash flow from me (guarantee) is better than dealing with internet trolls.
5. Don't make this about ego. You have a GREAT skill - identifly situations etc - use it - let's make real money - more money
sorry for typos - doing quickly as super busy today
Me again. Last message - sorry to keep bothering you - but TRUST ME - come meet me in NYC.
Some thoughts:
1. Why do you waste SO MUCH TIME answering trolls with paragraphs - do you have INFINITE TIME? The sharps are making GAZILLIONS capping games, betting sites, finding spots to bet - and you are WASTING TIME trying to answer trolls. Why???? I am making money tailing picks etc and you waste time?
2. You are WRONG (in old thread) to say poker is more gamble than sports. Read the United States vs Lawrence Dicrista case in NY State (2012 case) - it has great math showing poker skill/luck and obvious less random than sports. It is 50ish page case file - easy to find b/c of Freedom of Information Act
3. You are WRONG to say that a poker play will do anything that is positive EV. Any smart finance guy will tell you that UTILITY = EV - Sigma ^2 * constant K - other costs. So when you increase variance (sigma square) and if you personally have high constant you don't always have to do EV positive stuff. Ex: Let's say my net worth is $1million. Gates offers to flip a coin for $1m but coin lands on heads 55% of time - and he asks me to play. My EV is positive but the sigma squared is SO big it is NOT worth me to do. In fact i should be willing to pay some money to NOT do it if forced to do it. Most sports gamblers nad poker players don't understnad this concept.
4. Do you know sports books are less than 5% of profits of casinos so you aren't going to crush Steve Wynn as long as he has penny slots (30%+ of profits). I appreciate you trying to help your mom etc but I think getting a cash flow from me (guarantee) is better than dealing with internet trolls.
5. Don't make this about ego. You have a GREAT skill - identifly situations etc - use it - let's make real money - more money
sorry for typos - doing quickly as super busy today
Thing is, it's been a half century or so since a team won at Indy and at Purdue in the same year.
If Wisky can impose their slow-down game-plan, & come away w/ a win, then they're Final-4 bound.
Streaks are my TO be broken Pendo. The overwhelming majority of that streak came when Wisky invested nothing in its basketball pro game.
I was so impressed by this team last year with no bench knocking off Xavier. They grind you, grind you, grind you until you break. It's the same players, even better with extra pieces. Ya don't se that in the NCAA anymore EVER where everyone is ken and done. This is a very sad pectoral team IMO and one that can win outright in this spot. I'd like them coming off a loss but it's to their credit they knocked off Indy. That was a huge game for Indy and I believe they never had a lead.
Thing is, it's been a half century or so since a team won at Indy and at Purdue in the same year.
If Wisky can impose their slow-down game-plan, & come away w/ a win, then they're Final-4 bound.
Streaks are my TO be broken Pendo. The overwhelming majority of that streak came when Wisky invested nothing in its basketball pro game.
I was so impressed by this team last year with no bench knocking off Xavier. They grind you, grind you, grind you until you break. It's the same players, even better with extra pieces. Ya don't se that in the NCAA anymore EVER where everyone is ken and done. This is a very sad pectoral team IMO and one that can win outright in this spot. I'd like them coming off a loss but it's to their credit they knocked off Indy. That was a huge game for Indy and I believe they never had a lead.
Have a job BigDude. This actually provides a very necessary distraction.
The trolls are the ones you need to really shake down in terms of where they get their free time. "Reporting back to higher ups" on a capping website about an anonymous poster.....now that's some free time right there.
Wow Pendo you think they'll blow them out? 7 or more even with best games from two of their starters? Not me. BOL.
Reporting back. It seems as though you are melting down here again.....all the typical signs of a major meltdown. Ive seen it a million times, that is why I'm siding with you Scal. I think we should stricken the Purdue bet from the record, not because it's right, but because I feel bad for you, need to get you back on course.
Have a job BigDude. This actually provides a very necessary distraction.
The trolls are the ones you need to really shake down in terms of where they get their free time. "Reporting back to higher ups" on a capping website about an anonymous poster.....now that's some free time right there.
Wow Pendo you think they'll blow them out? 7 or more even with best games from two of their starters? Not me. BOL.
Reporting back. It seems as though you are melting down here again.....all the typical signs of a major meltdown. Ive seen it a million times, that is why I'm siding with you Scal. I think we should stricken the Purdue bet from the record, not because it's right, but because I feel bad for you, need to get you back on course.
Me again. Last message - sorry to keep bothering you - but TRUST ME - come meet me in NYC.
Some thoughts:
1. Why do you waste SO MUCH TIME answering trolls with paragraphs - do you have INFINITE TIME? The sharps are making GAZILLIONS capping games, betting sites, finding spots to bet - and you are WASTING TIME trying to answer trolls. Why???? I am making money tailing picks etc and you waste time?
2. You are WRONG (in old thread) to say poker is more gamble than sports. Read the United States vs Lawrence Dicrista case in NY State (2012 case) - it has great math showing poker skill/luck and obvious less random than sports. It is 50ish page case file - easy to find b/c of Freedom of Information Act
3. You are WRONG to say that a poker play will do anything that is positive EV. Any smart finance guy will tell you that UTILITY = EV - Sigma ^2 * constant K - other costs. So when you increase variance (sigma square) and if you personally have high constant you don't always have to do EV positive stuff. Ex: Let's say my net worth is $1million. Gates offers to flip a coin for $1m but coin lands on heads 55% of time - and he asks me to play. My EV is positive but the sigma squared is SO big it is NOT worth me to do. In fact i should be willing to pay some money to NOT do it if forced to do it. Most sports gamblers nad poker players don't understnad this concept.
4. Do you know sports books are less than 5% of profits of casinos so you aren't going to crush Steve Wynn as long as he has penny slots (30%+ of profits). I appreciate you trying to help your mom etc but I think getting a cash flow from me (guarantee) is better than dealing with internet trolls.
5. Don't make this about ego. You have a GREAT skill - identifly situations etc - use it - let's make real money - more money
sorry for typos - doing quickly as super busy today
GOOD LUCK find my old PM and hit me up
Kvs I'll get back to you by PM about yor capping/poker philosophy because you raise some interesting points. I have to do some food shopping right now.
But ultimately my job just takes far to much of my time to dedicate anything more to capping than I do, which I do as a hobby (with the intent to burn sports books with other people's money).
And I enjoy this to a degree (and the trolling is a real study in human nature so it does have some merit - this stalking has a lot to do with attempts to be an alpha male, to take down the silver back gorilla, and has more to do with their shortcomings in life than it does capping.
I'd love the medical community to study their testosterone level shifts when they post on here. I'm serious when I say that a losing gambling thread that I post is akin to sexual arousal to them, their shriveled gonads telling the tale. These threads should be provided to Scientific America with Hugh Jorgan Jdr, Gimmee Ace Chaloots and Mbialowas being the primary focus).
Me again. Last message - sorry to keep bothering you - but TRUST ME - come meet me in NYC.
Some thoughts:
1. Why do you waste SO MUCH TIME answering trolls with paragraphs - do you have INFINITE TIME? The sharps are making GAZILLIONS capping games, betting sites, finding spots to bet - and you are WASTING TIME trying to answer trolls. Why???? I am making money tailing picks etc and you waste time?
2. You are WRONG (in old thread) to say poker is more gamble than sports. Read the United States vs Lawrence Dicrista case in NY State (2012 case) - it has great math showing poker skill/luck and obvious less random than sports. It is 50ish page case file - easy to find b/c of Freedom of Information Act
3. You are WRONG to say that a poker play will do anything that is positive EV. Any smart finance guy will tell you that UTILITY = EV - Sigma ^2 * constant K - other costs. So when you increase variance (sigma square) and if you personally have high constant you don't always have to do EV positive stuff. Ex: Let's say my net worth is $1million. Gates offers to flip a coin for $1m but coin lands on heads 55% of time - and he asks me to play. My EV is positive but the sigma squared is SO big it is NOT worth me to do. In fact i should be willing to pay some money to NOT do it if forced to do it. Most sports gamblers nad poker players don't understnad this concept.
4. Do you know sports books are less than 5% of profits of casinos so you aren't going to crush Steve Wynn as long as he has penny slots (30%+ of profits). I appreciate you trying to help your mom etc but I think getting a cash flow from me (guarantee) is better than dealing with internet trolls.
5. Don't make this about ego. You have a GREAT skill - identifly situations etc - use it - let's make real money - more money
sorry for typos - doing quickly as super busy today
GOOD LUCK find my old PM and hit me up
Kvs I'll get back to you by PM about yor capping/poker philosophy because you raise some interesting points. I have to do some food shopping right now.
But ultimately my job just takes far to much of my time to dedicate anything more to capping than I do, which I do as a hobby (with the intent to burn sports books with other people's money).
And I enjoy this to a degree (and the trolling is a real study in human nature so it does have some merit - this stalking has a lot to do with attempts to be an alpha male, to take down the silver back gorilla, and has more to do with their shortcomings in life than it does capping.
I'd love the medical community to study their testosterone level shifts when they post on here. I'm serious when I say that a losing gambling thread that I post is akin to sexual arousal to them, their shriveled gonads telling the tale. These threads should be provided to Scientific America with Hugh Jorgan Jdr, Gimmee Ace Chaloots and Mbialowas being the primary focus).
As is the case in every Purdue game Pendo. And they are 0-3 against the best of who they faced Villanova Lousiville and Minnesota.
Purdue beat a very good Notre Dame team. They trailed by double digits at halftime, but Painter came out with a smaller lineup that ND could not stop. Swanigan was a beast in that game. Who is going to guard Swanny?
As is the case in every Purdue game Pendo. And they are 0-3 against the best of who they faced Villanova Lousiville and Minnesota.
Purdue beat a very good Notre Dame team. They trailed by double digits at halftime, but Painter came out with a smaller lineup that ND could not stop. Swanigan was a beast in that game. Who is going to guard Swanny?
Reporting back. It seems as though you are melting down here again.....all the typical signs of a major meltdown. Ive seen it a million times, that is why I'm siding with you Scal. I think we should stricken the Purdue bet from the record, not because it's right, but because I feel bad for you, need to get you back on course.
Says the guy who is "reporting" to another anonymous male ABOUT AN ANONYMOUS male's record and one who is posting picks and write-ups for free.
THAT guy will tell others who is having a meltdown.
Reporting back. It seems as though you are melting down here again.....all the typical signs of a major meltdown. Ive seen it a million times, that is why I'm siding with you Scal. I think we should stricken the Purdue bet from the record, not because it's right, but because I feel bad for you, need to get you back on course.
Says the guy who is "reporting" to another anonymous male ABOUT AN ANONYMOUS male's record and one who is posting picks and write-ups for free.
THAT guy will tell others who is having a meltdown.
Purdue beat a very good Notre Dame team. They trailed by double digits at halftime, but Painter came out with a smaller lineup that ND could not stop. Swanigan was a beast in that game. Who is going to guard Swanny?
This ND game is getting a lot of love! Maybe it's warranted. I don't want to talk about Wisky running away here. That's not their game. This Purdue team is excellent. If you like Purdue by all means, I can't beat on the pick.
Purdue beat a very good Notre Dame team. They trailed by double digits at halftime, but Painter came out with a smaller lineup that ND could not stop. Swanigan was a beast in that game. Who is going to guard Swanny?
This ND game is getting a lot of love! Maybe it's warranted. I don't want to talk about Wisky running away here. That's not their game. This Purdue team is excellent. If you like Purdue by all means, I can't beat on the pick.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.