*tailing.
Scal, you were the guy that liked Missouri to cover against Purdue, so I'm not sure why you're talking there. You've been wrong about a lot of stuff. I believe I probably called you out on a few bets a while ago that you didn't like or something. I do this to everyone though. And I do to save the casual bettor money because this forum is dominated by about 6-7 posters and the average guy who comes on here thinks of em like Jesus. The capping here overall has been bad - the best bets being missed every week. And yeah the "best bets" is subjective, but to me world class cappers would be picking up on stuff that some of you haven't. How about no one being on LSU this week? I mean that's a joke. I was going to make a post last week about the OSU/TCU over and I didn't, and was gonna post about Oklahoma -18 being a sucker bet and didn't, just because I don't like to jynx myself by posting to be honest. But I probably will post on that one. Anywho . . .
You missed the entire point of my post buddy. If Georgia covers, this game is going to go over. That's the point. Hence, there is no point in betting the point spread instead of the total. If Missouri scores 30 points in this game, Georgia can't cover without the over. I would pick Georgia if I had to. I just don't think from a game theory standpoint it makes sense. This is going to be an uptempo game. And you should be smart enough to know that teams play worse defense on the road vs at home. Yeah they weren't great last week. BUT . . . BUT . . . their fast tempo gives other teams more possessions. And at home is it possible they could hold to Georgia to 35-38ish in this game? I think it is. I think the odds are Georgia gets into the 40's as I already mentioned. But if Mizzou gets 31, now Georgia needs what 47+ to get there?
If you're betting on Georgia winning by putting in the high 40's or 50's you should be betting on the individual team total man. It pays the same way. Maybe it isn't as "cool" as betting on the spread. But this is about winning. You can't argue what I'm saying here from a pure logic standpoint. Even if Mizzou is bad on offense and they lose 45-20 that's like right on the total. We'll see.
The funny part is I don't see anyone on this forum on Oklahoma State. Same line. Texas Tech should give up 50. What we don't know is how much Tech will score. We have a given basically that State gets like 49+ and no one will take them. This is the same type of game except the home team is getting the points and everyone is all over Georgia. People on this forum just overplay every single favorite and don't consider the road factor at all. They see a spread and see only 14 and don't factor in that it's a 9-10 point swing home to road. Some people are dumb enough to take Georgia -14.5 on the road, but not -23 at home when it's actually the exact same line. But that isn't even the point I'm what I'm saying.
I do think Missouri is soft on defense. And I do question is Missouri has a strong enough crowd to rattle teams like Auburn does for example. I think Georgia likely covers. But it is a weaker bet than the total. 49-35 and you lose - unless you buy the half point which really you want to avoid doing when you have double digit spreads.
Scal, you were the guy that liked Missouri to cover against Purdue, so I'm not sure why you're talking there. You've been wrong about a lot of stuff. I believe I probably called you out on a few bets a while ago that you didn't like or something. I do this to everyone though. And I do to save the casual bettor money because this forum is dominated by about 6-7 posters and the average guy who comes on here thinks of em like Jesus. The capping here overall has been bad - the best bets being missed every week. And yeah the "best bets" is subjective, but to me world class cappers would be picking up on stuff that some of you haven't. How about no one being on LSU this week? I mean that's a joke. I was going to make a post last week about the OSU/TCU over and I didn't, and was gonna post about Oklahoma -18 being a sucker bet and didn't, just because I don't like to jynx myself by posting to be honest. But I probably will post on that one. Anywho . . .
You missed the entire point of my post buddy. If Georgia covers, this game is going to go over. That's the point. Hence, there is no point in betting the point spread instead of the total. If Missouri scores 30 points in this game, Georgia can't cover without the over. I would pick Georgia if I had to. I just don't think from a game theory standpoint it makes sense. This is going to be an uptempo game. And you should be smart enough to know that teams play worse defense on the road vs at home. Yeah they weren't great last week. BUT . . . BUT . . . their fast tempo gives other teams more possessions. And at home is it possible they could hold to Georgia to 35-38ish in this game? I think it is. I think the odds are Georgia gets into the 40's as I already mentioned. But if Mizzou gets 31, now Georgia needs what 47+ to get there?
If you're betting on Georgia winning by putting in the high 40's or 50's you should be betting on the individual team total man. It pays the same way. Maybe it isn't as "cool" as betting on the spread. But this is about winning. You can't argue what I'm saying here from a pure logic standpoint. Even if Mizzou is bad on offense and they lose 45-20 that's like right on the total. We'll see.
The funny part is I don't see anyone on this forum on Oklahoma State. Same line. Texas Tech should give up 50. What we don't know is how much Tech will score. We have a given basically that State gets like 49+ and no one will take them. This is the same type of game except the home team is getting the points and everyone is all over Georgia. People on this forum just overplay every single favorite and don't consider the road factor at all. They see a spread and see only 14 and don't factor in that it's a 9-10 point swing home to road. Some people are dumb enough to take Georgia -14.5 on the road, but not -23 at home when it's actually the exact same line. But that isn't even the point I'm what I'm saying.
I do think Missouri is soft on defense. And I do question is Missouri has a strong enough crowd to rattle teams like Auburn does for example. I think Georgia likely covers. But it is a weaker bet than the total. 49-35 and you lose - unless you buy the half point which really you want to avoid doing when you have double digit spreads.
Fluffy? C’mon man! Will you please shorten your verbage? Don’t get me wrong, you have excellent input.....but the amount of key strokes needs to minimize. My gawd!
Fluffy? C’mon man! Will you please shorten your verbage? Don’t get me wrong, you have excellent input.....but the amount of key strokes needs to minimize. My gawd!
Don't trust Lane at all ... Look at it now .. down 19 ... Spread is 14. CMON UCF need one more TD
Don't trust Lane at all ... Look at it now .. down 19 ... Spread is 14. CMON UCF need one more TD
UCF can drive the field and score in a minute IF they want to. Strange game of swings.
UCF can drive the field and score in a minute IF they want to. Strange game of swings.
Scal, you were the guy that liked Missouri to cover against Purdue, so I'm not sure why you're talking there. You've been wrong about a lot of stuff. I believe I probably called you out on a few bets a while ago that you didn't like or something. I do this to everyone though. And I do to save the casual bettor money because this forum is dominated by about 6-7 posters and the average guy who comes on here thinks of em like Jesus. The capping here overall has been bad - the best bets being missed every week. And yeah the "best bets" is subjective, but to me world class cappers would be picking up on stuff that some of you haven't. How about no one being on LSU this week? I mean that's a joke. I was going to make a post last week about the OSU/TCU over and I didn't, and was gonna post about Oklahoma -18 being a sucker bet and didn't, just because I don't like to jynx myself by posting to be honest. But I probably will post on that one. Anywho . . .
You missed the entire point of my post buddy. If Georgia covers, this game is going to go over. That's the point. Hence, there is no point in betting the point spread instead of the total. If Missouri scores 30 points in this game, Georgia can't cover without the over. I would pick Georgia if I had to. I just don't think from a game theory standpoint it makes sense. This is going to be an uptempo game. And you should be smart enough to know that teams play worse defense on the road vs at home. Yeah they weren't great last week. BUT . . . BUT . . . their fast tempo gives other teams more possessions. And at home is it possible they could hold to Georgia to 35-38ish in this game? I think it is. I think the odds are Georgia gets into the 40's as I already mentioned. But if Mizzou gets 31, now Georgia needs what 47+ to get there?
If you're betting on Georgia winning by putting in the high 40's or 50's you should be betting on the individual team total man. It pays the same way. Maybe it isn't as "cool" as betting on the spread. But this is about winning. You can't argue what I'm saying here from a pure logic standpoint. Even if Mizzou is bad on offense and they lose 45-20 that's like right on the total. We'll see.
The funny part is I don't see anyone on this forum on Oklahoma State. Same line. Texas Tech should give up 50. What we don't know is how much Tech will score. We have a given basically that State gets like 49+ and no one will take them. This is the same type of game except the home team is getting the points and everyone is all over Georgia. People on this forum just overplay every single favorite and don't consider the road factor at all. They see a spread and see only 14 and don't factor in that it's a 9-10 point swing home to road. Some people are dumb enough to take Georgia -14.5 on the road, but not -23 at home when it's actually the exact same line. But that isn't even the point I'm what I'm saying.
I do think Missouri is soft on defense. And I do question is Missouri has a strong enough crowd to rattle teams like Auburn does for example. I think Georgia likely covers. But it is a weaker bet than the total. 49-35 and you lose - unless you buy the half point which really you want to avoid doing when you have double digit spreads.
Scal, you were the guy that liked Missouri to cover against Purdue, so I'm not sure why you're talking there. You've been wrong about a lot of stuff. I believe I probably called you out on a few bets a while ago that you didn't like or something. I do this to everyone though. And I do to save the casual bettor money because this forum is dominated by about 6-7 posters and the average guy who comes on here thinks of em like Jesus. The capping here overall has been bad - the best bets being missed every week. And yeah the "best bets" is subjective, but to me world class cappers would be picking up on stuff that some of you haven't. How about no one being on LSU this week? I mean that's a joke. I was going to make a post last week about the OSU/TCU over and I didn't, and was gonna post about Oklahoma -18 being a sucker bet and didn't, just because I don't like to jynx myself by posting to be honest. But I probably will post on that one. Anywho . . .
You missed the entire point of my post buddy. If Georgia covers, this game is going to go over. That's the point. Hence, there is no point in betting the point spread instead of the total. If Missouri scores 30 points in this game, Georgia can't cover without the over. I would pick Georgia if I had to. I just don't think from a game theory standpoint it makes sense. This is going to be an uptempo game. And you should be smart enough to know that teams play worse defense on the road vs at home. Yeah they weren't great last week. BUT . . . BUT . . . their fast tempo gives other teams more possessions. And at home is it possible they could hold to Georgia to 35-38ish in this game? I think it is. I think the odds are Georgia gets into the 40's as I already mentioned. But if Mizzou gets 31, now Georgia needs what 47+ to get there?
If you're betting on Georgia winning by putting in the high 40's or 50's you should be betting on the individual team total man. It pays the same way. Maybe it isn't as "cool" as betting on the spread. But this is about winning. You can't argue what I'm saying here from a pure logic standpoint. Even if Mizzou is bad on offense and they lose 45-20 that's like right on the total. We'll see.
The funny part is I don't see anyone on this forum on Oklahoma State. Same line. Texas Tech should give up 50. What we don't know is how much Tech will score. We have a given basically that State gets like 49+ and no one will take them. This is the same type of game except the home team is getting the points and everyone is all over Georgia. People on this forum just overplay every single favorite and don't consider the road factor at all. They see a spread and see only 14 and don't factor in that it's a 9-10 point swing home to road. Some people are dumb enough to take Georgia -14.5 on the road, but not -23 at home when it's actually the exact same line. But that isn't even the point I'm what I'm saying.
I do think Missouri is soft on defense. And I do question is Missouri has a strong enough crowd to rattle teams like Auburn does for example. I think Georgia likely covers. But it is a weaker bet than the total. 49-35 and you lose - unless you buy the half point which really you want to avoid doing when you have double digit spreads.
This is grossssss
This is grossssss
1st and G. Need one score. And UCF covers and hits the over.
1st and G. Need one score. And UCF covers and hits the over.
Kiffin not even calling Time-outs. What a joke and fix this is
Kiffin not even calling Time-outs. What a joke and fix this is
Looks like the regs here are ganging up on me. I'll respond to everyone -
Regarding my lengthy posts, you can't sum up why a pick is a good pick in 2-3 sentences most of the time. A good bet requires putting pieces together. I don't post often, but when I do they tend to be longer. So be it. You don't have to read it.
Doubleup - I don't care about the GOY lines. Scal made a post on Mizzou before the game. It lost. I don't care if he lost honestly. But he brought up something on Missouri so I said yeah well you lost last week with em. That's fair.
Blowout, first off, good pick on Auburn last week buddy. You should have realized that line was the equivalent to LSU being -1 at home in which case I doubt you'd ever take Auburn. But you missed that. I wouldn't have brought it up, but hey you wanna go after me that's fair play now. And tons of people tailed you and lost on that. But regardless, why do I post in other people's threads? Because this forum is dominated by 6-7 posters that get all the replies. People don't look in threads of new posters. I'm pretty sure I already mentioned this. When I see a POPULAR play across this forum that I know is bad, I will go into a thread and make a point. It isn't personal. And I do this when I know I'm mathematically right. You guys make fundamental betting errors every week. You guys LOVE laying the big chalk with the road favs which is a great way to lose in college football. It's okay to take a road fav here and there . . . Bama last week was a nice exception. But it's every week. Oklahoma last week . . . Georgia this week . . . it's a bad way to cap.
I don't care about getting love and support or boosting my image by posting my own thread. I really love the NFL card this week and expect to win easy, but I haven't posted because I don't feel like it. It won't get any attention till week 8 and that's if I just rape the books every week. Doesn't matter to me. Long as I get my own bets in and win that's what I want. I'm helping more by trying to get people off the popular reg bets that are bad. And I'm not saying all these bets are bad, but I see a couple mistakes every week and I point them out. I'm wrong here and there, but usually right. I don't even dispute posts much, but this year I've seen a lot of regs all on the same teams in some sketchy spots. So I have to comment.
Looks like the regs here are ganging up on me. I'll respond to everyone -
Regarding my lengthy posts, you can't sum up why a pick is a good pick in 2-3 sentences most of the time. A good bet requires putting pieces together. I don't post often, but when I do they tend to be longer. So be it. You don't have to read it.
Doubleup - I don't care about the GOY lines. Scal made a post on Mizzou before the game. It lost. I don't care if he lost honestly. But he brought up something on Missouri so I said yeah well you lost last week with em. That's fair.
Blowout, first off, good pick on Auburn last week buddy. You should have realized that line was the equivalent to LSU being -1 at home in which case I doubt you'd ever take Auburn. But you missed that. I wouldn't have brought it up, but hey you wanna go after me that's fair play now. And tons of people tailed you and lost on that. But regardless, why do I post in other people's threads? Because this forum is dominated by 6-7 posters that get all the replies. People don't look in threads of new posters. I'm pretty sure I already mentioned this. When I see a POPULAR play across this forum that I know is bad, I will go into a thread and make a point. It isn't personal. And I do this when I know I'm mathematically right. You guys make fundamental betting errors every week. You guys LOVE laying the big chalk with the road favs which is a great way to lose in college football. It's okay to take a road fav here and there . . . Bama last week was a nice exception. But it's every week. Oklahoma last week . . . Georgia this week . . . it's a bad way to cap.
I don't care about getting love and support or boosting my image by posting my own thread. I really love the NFL card this week and expect to win easy, but I haven't posted because I don't feel like it. It won't get any attention till week 8 and that's if I just rape the books every week. Doesn't matter to me. Long as I get my own bets in and win that's what I want. I'm helping more by trying to get people off the popular reg bets that are bad. And I'm not saying all these bets are bad, but I see a couple mistakes every week and I point them out. I'm wrong here and there, but usually right. I don't even dispute posts much, but this year I've seen a lot of regs all on the same teams in some sketchy spots. So I have to comment.
Looks like the regs here are ganging up on me. I'll respond to everyone -
Regarding my lengthy posts, you can't sum up why a pick is a good pick in 2-3 sentences most of the time. A good bet requires putting pieces together. I don't post often, but when I do they tend to be longer. So be it. You don't have to read it.
Doubleup - I don't care about the GOY lines. Scal made a post on Mizzou before the game. It lost. I don't care if he lost honestly. But he brought up something on Missouri so I said yeah well you lost last week with em. That's fair.
Blowout, first off, good pick on Auburn last week buddy. You should have realized that line was the equivalent to LSU being -1 at home in which case I doubt you'd ever take Auburn. But you missed that. I wouldn't have brought it up, but hey you wanna go after me that's fair play now. And tons of people tailed you and lost on that. But regardless, why do I post in other people's threads? Because this forum is dominated by 6-7 posters that get all the replies. People don't look in threads of new posters. I'm pretty sure I already mentioned this. When I see a POPULAR play across this forum that I know is bad, I will go into a thread and make a point. It isn't personal. And I do this when I know I'm mathematically right. You guys make fundamental betting errors every week. You guys LOVE laying the big chalk with the road favs which is a great way to lose in college football. It's okay to take a road fav here and there . . . Bama last week was a nice exception. But it's every week. Oklahoma last week . . . Georgia this week . . . it's a bad way to cap.
I don't care about getting love and support or boosting my image by posting my own thread. I really love the NFL card this week and expect to win easy, but I haven't posted because I don't feel like it. It won't get any attention till week 8 and that's if I just rape the books every week. Doesn't matter to me. Long as I get my own bets in and win that's what I want. I'm helping more by trying to get people off the popular reg bets that are bad. And I'm not saying all these bets are bad, but I see a couple mistakes every week and I point them out. I'm wrong here and there, but usually right. I don't even dispute posts much, but this year I've seen a lot of regs all on the same teams in some sketchy spots. So I have to comment.
Looks like the regs here are ganging up on me. I'll respond to everyone -
Regarding my lengthy posts, you can't sum up why a pick is a good pick in 2-3 sentences most of the time. A good bet requires putting pieces together. I don't post often, but when I do they tend to be longer. So be it. You don't have to read it.
Doubleup - I don't care about the GOY lines. Scal made a post on Mizzou before the game. It lost. I don't care if he lost honestly. But he brought up something on Missouri so I said yeah well you lost last week with em. That's fair.
Blowout, first off, good pick on Auburn last week buddy. You should have realized that line was the equivalent to LSU being -1 at home in which case I doubt you'd ever take Auburn. But you missed that. I wouldn't have brought it up, but hey you wanna go after me that's fair play now. And tons of people tailed you and lost on that. But regardless, why do I post in other people's threads? Because this forum is dominated by 6-7 posters that get all the replies. People don't look in threads of new posters. I'm pretty sure I already mentioned this. When I see a POPULAR play across this forum that I know is bad, I will go into a thread and make a point. It isn't personal. And I do this when I know I'm mathematically right. You guys make fundamental betting errors every week. You guys LOVE laying the big chalk with the road favs which is a great way to lose in college football. It's okay to take a road fav here and there . . . Bama last week was a nice exception. But it's every week. Oklahoma last week . . . Georgia this week . . . it's a bad way to cap.
I don't care about getting love and support or boosting my image by posting my own thread. I really love the NFL card this week and expect to win easy, but I haven't posted because I don't feel like it. It won't get any attention till week 8 and that's if I just rape the books every week. Doesn't matter to me. Long as I get my own bets in and win that's what I want. I'm helping more by trying to get people off the popular reg bets that are bad. And I'm not saying all these bets are bad, but I see a couple mistakes every week and I point them out. I'm wrong here and there, but usually right. I don't even dispute posts much, but this year I've seen a lot of regs all on the same teams in some sketchy spots. So I have to comment.
My analysis couldn't get more spot on. I told ya, if Mizzou gets 30, Georgia needs 45 plus to cover. In that case, the over obviously hits. However, you could have a 42-30 game that doesn't cover for Georgia, but the over already hits. The over was initially 64. Got bet up to 69 today which is incredible movement. That's why theoretically if you're thinking about this correctly you should be playing the total - unless you really thought Missouri was getting less than 20. But at home with the tempo and amount of possessions they get, not sure why you'd think that.
To be fair though, Georgia hasn't played as well on offense as I thought. 17 points off defense and special teams. TDs coming on jump balls turned TDs off missed tackles.
Now you're sweating if Georgia can tack on a meaningless 3 to get the cover. It's just not easy to win by that much on the road vs a solid team man. 14.5 is so easy to get backdoored on. Georgia is very good, but they aren't Bama.
My analysis couldn't get more spot on. I told ya, if Mizzou gets 30, Georgia needs 45 plus to cover. In that case, the over obviously hits. However, you could have a 42-30 game that doesn't cover for Georgia, but the over already hits. The over was initially 64. Got bet up to 69 today which is incredible movement. That's why theoretically if you're thinking about this correctly you should be playing the total - unless you really thought Missouri was getting less than 20. But at home with the tempo and amount of possessions they get, not sure why you'd think that.
To be fair though, Georgia hasn't played as well on offense as I thought. 17 points off defense and special teams. TDs coming on jump balls turned TDs off missed tackles.
Now you're sweating if Georgia can tack on a meaningless 3 to get the cover. It's just not easy to win by that much on the road vs a solid team man. 14.5 is so easy to get backdoored on. Georgia is very good, but they aren't Bama.
My analysis couldn't get more spot on. I told ya, if Mizzou gets 30, Georgia needs 45 plus to cover. In that case, the over obviously hits. However, you could have a 42-30 game that doesn't cover for Georgia, but the over already hits. The over was initially 64. Got bet up to 69 today which is incredible movement. That's why theoretically if you're thinking about this correctly you should be playing the total - unless you really thought Missouri was getting less than 20. But at home with the tempo and amount of possessions they get, not sure why you'd think that.
To be fair though, Georgia hasn't played as well on offense as I thought. 17 points off defense and special teams. TDs coming on jump balls turned TDs off missed tackles.
Now you're sweating if Georgia can tack on a meaningless 3 to get the cover. It's just not easy to win by that much on the road vs a solid team man. 14.5 is so easy to get backdoored on. Georgia is very good, but they aren't Bama.
My analysis couldn't get more spot on. I told ya, if Mizzou gets 30, Georgia needs 45 plus to cover. In that case, the over obviously hits. However, you could have a 42-30 game that doesn't cover for Georgia, but the over already hits. The over was initially 64. Got bet up to 69 today which is incredible movement. That's why theoretically if you're thinking about this correctly you should be playing the total - unless you really thought Missouri was getting less than 20. But at home with the tempo and amount of possessions they get, not sure why you'd think that.
To be fair though, Georgia hasn't played as well on offense as I thought. 17 points off defense and special teams. TDs coming on jump balls turned TDs off missed tackles.
Now you're sweating if Georgia can tack on a meaningless 3 to get the cover. It's just not easy to win by that much on the road vs a solid team man. 14.5 is so easy to get backdoored on. Georgia is very good, but they aren't Bama.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.