Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
LOL |
Tedcyclone | 5 |
|
|
Agreed. Great stuff here, Wahoo. Good luck on the business deal too!
|
WahooS | 122 |
|
|
You were 10-0 and came in here looking for help, looking for someone good to trust, and doubted your genius? HMM
|
marshall78 | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Thechad10: The public always goes off of what happened "yesterday". Yeah, "yesterday," i.e., last 2 games, the Cubs bats came alive.
|
Thechad10 | 13 |
|
|
viet coffee shop?
please describe your history of big money exchanges with this "coffee shop." lemme guess...they press you when you lose but slow/no pay if you win and hope you lose it back LMAO @ 50k bet at one of these OC "coffee shops." pretty sure neither you nor them can even put up 10 racks, let alone 50
|
capaxone | 21 |
|
|
Dead wrong
|
MacedonianQueen | 5 |
|
|
How about Clemson on the alternate money line?
|
PapaShango | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VicRaven: Just curious if your 20-8 plays we're posted before 1/6/16. If so, where. Just curious. My record is 53-5. Nope
|
CoachKarter | 162 |
|
|
Your projected total is 203 so you're using under 204 in a parlay?
|
pcollins | 10 |
|
|
He figured he'd share the money he's won over the last 13 years
|
i like $$$$$ | 7 |
|
|
replied to
The proof of 2015: Why you will have longterm success when capping the fundamentals of this game
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by BigPell: Interesting thread. Suuma do you agree that if you cap every game by using prior statistics Vegas always knows exactly where you're at? Do you think that's for better or worse in the long run? Im truly interested to hear your theory here. Is there really never a time where you cap a game and think to yourself...well i have the seahawks at 12 points better than the vikings but with the exception of week 16 the seahawks have been easy money down the stretch and there's no way the public doesnt load up on these guys at -6. Vegas usually wins in these situations. Figure out what level vegas was on when they made the spread and cap from one level above never below. Panthers were +140 to go undedeated when they were 13-0. They had three games left. The giants were the only one that people thought they could lose so you know theyre coming to play for that one. Beating tampa when you're 15-0 to go undefeated is almost a lock. That left us with atlanta getting 7 at home against a panthers team that beat them 38-0 two weeks before. You could never in a million years cap that game and land on atlanta but it was quite possibly the easiest bet of the entire nfl season if you understand vegas and how and why they make these lines the way they do. Falcons money line got bet down all week by people who cap lines because they realized exactly what was going on. The key at the end of the day is to figure out which games you need to cap lines for and which games you need to cap straight up. Try not to fall into one category and use recent trends to put yourself in vegas' shoes to figure out where they have you pegged at. Its all about levels. As far as people winning at 70% year in and year out i can tell you that is absolutely not possible. 80% in one season is more possible than 70% over a 10-20 year span it's just never going to happen and if it does its not a result of skill. Bol My favorite post in this thread. The levels thing is something I've tried to explain to friends a lot in the past. How you profile each game should determine what factors are most important for that matchup. With certain games, the line/market says more while fundamental capping (how i would characterize summa's style) means more in others. BigPell, I sent you a friend request
|
suuma | 89 |
|
|
replied to
The proof of 2015: Why you will have longterm success when capping the fundamentals of this game
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by SportingLife510: Gawd, you people go back and forth on here like school girls. Really? I thought the discussion in this thread is better than most of the stuff found in these forums and less bickering than usual. Suuma seems to get pretty good dialogue going, the few times I've seen.
|
suuma | 89 |
|
|
AustinSharp getting owned in his own thread
|
AustinSharp | 21 |
|
|
First you say "I'm playing Oregon, and buying the hook to -6" then later say you didn't play anything at all?
|
Gamebreaker23 | 6 |
|
|
Nicely done. You called this exact scenario before the game
|
seafood_pasta | 7 |
|
|
LOL...c'mon dude
|
RachelStarrPix | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits: They say teasers are sucker bets. Couldn't disagree more, if you know how to bet them. Betting $2 to win $3000 is an awesome return for one ticket. (Even though you have to win 20 teams) It's not too hard to win a 20 team teaser. It's a good challenge...but far from impossible. Oh, a bet that pays 1500-1 isn't too hard to win? Interesting
|
oldwiseone | 87 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sugabear: Well ok!! I think you have convinced everyone here!!!! Tulsa covers with alot of offense because you have some mold. Gotcha! This spot fits his mold!!! DO NOT QUESTION THE SPOT OR HIS MOLD
|
irefusetolose | 17 |
|
|
Don't hedge yet. Great matchup, much better position than expected when you made the bet
|
MclatchyHostage | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by monstergrit:
didnt realize por knocked out okc from the playoffs last year with the buzzer beater, which is not a good angle for us adding to the dbl revenge, but most of the okc team was not present for that last year so i doubt it has a huge effect in this one Never happened. Por knocked out Hou, not OKC |
monstergrit | 14 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.