Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@SuckmyRick Congratulations rookie, those were rock solid.. who do you like Monday night? |
SuckmyRick | 21 |
|
|
Cincinnati, on a 3rd string QB, Steelers are coming off 2 bad losses.... was thinking Pittsburgh would be coming for blood.... hmmmm
|
Maverick11 | 23 |
|
|
with that as well dragon...Fla |
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Koa , good pick on Clemson yesterday- I feel you - don’t think patts mess around today- they should put the pedal to the medal |
Covers | 3 |
|
|
LSU |
Covers | 9 |
|
|
ND |
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Want to go with ND but seems too easy... possibly some sort of reverse Vegas / bookie trick ? |
Covers | 10 |
|
|
was looking-2018 wake bowl against Memphis wake won 37 - 34 2017 bowl tex a/m -wake won 55 - 52 can they handle a slow scoring mich st.…..maybe |
Covers | 11 |
|
|
wake forest |
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Miami is one terrible team,,they are painful to watch |
Covers | 14 |
|
|
smu |
Covers | 5 |
|
|
should be a good match up as charlotte seems to have had a bit of a tougher schedule by a smig...the schedules are very deceiving , as buff scored more pts but they were against weaker teams. where as charlotte didn't score as much but had more consistent better quality wins especially down the pike... in September both these teams played a top knotch teams , for buff it was temple in which they won (the week before they lost to lowly liberty u) ..on the other side of the table for charlotte it was Clemson in which they were slaughtered,but you can hardly hold that against them.. looking for a good game should be close for awhile then I look for charlotte to keep it close within 6.5 or post a out right win |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
looking like colt+8 .5 ... |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
P.S Every time you accidentally touch one of the rediculous adds it automatically reroutes you to somewhere you don’t want to be the adds were always super annoying, but now with the stupid new format - the need to fire who ever green lighted all thes rediculous changes |
Covers-Team | 124 |
|
|
This new format is absolutely terrible and all the advertisements are unbelievable annoying. I like the site and the people, but you will slowly loose Everyone trying to fix something that was somewhat perfect before.. has turned into something kind of annoying ( much harder to use and navigate, and the information is way to spread out - sadly looking for another site set up the way this one once was ! |
Covers-Team | 124 |
|
|
don't feel bad mak104 . I debated back n forth and fell into the same Pittsburgh trap last night- lets get a winner tonight- im leaning towards the colts not positive yet ...hopefully wel get some good feed back from our fellow brother betters |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
10 pts home field -hope so 49ers |
Covers | 3 |
|
|
10 is a big number to try n lay on a desparate nfl team ...even if they are at home |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
seattle +1 off the bye week |
Covers | 12 |
|
|
gotta beat the teams you can on your home field ,especially when the chances of you loosing on someone elses field is pretty good - should be an ugly slugfest -buffalo |
Covers | 15 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.