Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by GoodBadger: After weeks of trying my own spreadsheet building, I also wonder if anyone is either A) Upkeeping or B) Selling a functional version of the Super System Spreadsheet for 2015? After awhile frustration sets in and you're ready to throw down some cash to make it happen. :) Thank for any insight! You should look at Statfox.com- they have a subscription service that might make sense for you.
|
DegenGamble | 274 |
|
|
I like KC here, just a flat out better team and built to win on the road. Seattle can't score against Grandma let alone KC's bullpen.
|
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Tigers all day at +100, too much value with Price on the mound to pass it up. Tigers bats heating up with VMart back in the mix.
|
Targa1 | 17 |
|
|
I love these posts thanks for doing this.
|
RLeith35 | 30 |
|
|
Www.bettingbeast.co if you like to research trends
|
ecoute | 2 |
|
|
BOS -1.5
|
Covers | 9 |
|
|
And one unit on Astros
|
neander100 | 120 |
|
|
I have 8 units on Jays...
|
neander100 | 120 |
|
|
Could this guy be a bigger d bag? Who would spend this much time posting this crap?
|
SportsMavin | 501 |
|
|
Nah nah nah not at all. Banter is a good thing! We can all move on peacefully... Still I'm thinking of taking this study back as far as it can go (will take a long time) and I would like to do it for both the 10% and "Team Expert" number...
|
kcindc02 | 11 |
|
|
Bring it tool, you'll get destroyed. By the way, I did the work on this for the last 60 days and there is some fairly compelling data there (not the kind of data you might think btw).
Trigg you should stop by the District of Columbia I'd be happy to share it, and the back of my hand with you. But the back of my hand comes first.
|
kcindc02 | 11 |
|
|
Nope, just want you to oil up your hand and give me a fister while I watch my plays win. Quote Originally Posted by Trigg:
I suppose you want someone to wipe your ass as well, hey? |
kcindc02 | 11 |
|
|
Or let someone else do it for me.
|
kcindc02 | 11 |
|
|
Does anybody have any data on the results of the consensus picks from Covers? I would love to know the accuracy given certain levels of consensus, particularly on the Top 10% and Experts sections.
For instance, if 80% or higher on the Experts Consenus- what are the odds on getting that pick right/wrong? Also, same thing for the Top 10% category? That would be some powerful information if we had it... All it would take is someone patient enough to go back and log it all...
|
kcindc02 | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.