Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Good call on the Hawks. 2/1 to win the east now. Got in a few weeks ago at 10/1
|
Michfan15 | 15 |
|
|
nice call.
|
Michfan15 | 11 |
|
|
Why.....
I know he hasn't played well this year and his dad beats his hitting partners apparently, but +200 seems realllyyyyy high for a guy with this much talent.
|
elfitz11 | 7 |
|
|
Key i was wondering where you got your info on umpires. I feel like theyre huge for totals and you always mention them when you play totals. Any help you could give would be great.
BOL tonight.
|
KeyElement | 15 |
|
|
bol hitter.
Any plays on the 3:40 games??
|
hitterno24 | 22 |
|
|
I know Quick hasn't been himself, but I think you have to give LA the goalie advantage. There's no question Quick is still a better goalie than Phoenix' backup Labarbera....
Good luck with your pick, on the other side though. |
FinesFan | 19 |
|
|
Good call man.
Lookin forward to VCU/Mich.
|
Michfan15 | 75 |
|
|
Was wondering if you thought Venezuela had some value at +160 against the Dominican squad. Anibal is definately better than Volquez and both lineups are stacked. I've followed you for a while and you know your stuff. Any thoughts would be helpful.
|
HotGarbage | 11 |
|
|
I'm watching NBCSN and they're saying Rinne...also they just showed a shot of him warming up taking shots during the pregame....so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Rinne is starting
|
weeble5672 | 16 |
|
|
Tepham, why not a play on columbus TT under if you're worried about the blues scoring big and are confident with Halak??
|
Tepham | 160 |
|
|
I still have -119...I don't know much about Noren, it would just be a gamble on one of my favorite golfers. Seems worth it at almost 1/1 odds.
|
elfitz11 | 3 |
|
|
I don't bet much golf besides majors really...but someone tell me why Mcdowell is -119 against Noren. I know its kind of a crapshoot in match play (Woods and Rory lose haha)... but why not take the better golfer who I like a lot when you are barely laying any juice??
Someone who knows golf...
|
elfitz11 | 3 |
|
|
Nashville 2 - Anaheim 3 (SO)
Philly 2 - Florida 3 (SO) SJ 0 - Phoenix 1 (SO) Chicago 2 - Anaheim 3 (SO) Detroit 3 - St. Louis 4 (OT) St. Louis 0 - Colorado 1 (OT) NYR 2 - Ottawa 3 (SO) Nothing more frustrating....
|
elfitz11 | 2 |
|
|
I've actually lost the last 7 games that I've bet that have gone to overtime. I'm considering 3-way since I'm apparently going to lose anyway. Anyone else having this problem....??
|
elfitz11 | 2 |
|
|
Tepham, I'm curious why you like the under in the vancouver/minn game when you predicted a 3-2 OT win for vancouver, which would push. I guess you think it'll be low scoring and that would be the highest it would get??
|
Tepham | 99 |
|
|
So you're saying that if sf +3 had won and you lost the under, you would lose. But since sf +3 pushed and the under lost, its a push?
|
bluandbrneyes | 50 |
|
|
Oh okay that makes sense. Like Boston also but worried because it seems that the entire world does.
|
bluandbrneyes | 50 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by whisperman:
Canada..blu went o and 2 in superbowl. He pushed first quarter play and his teaser was a no play. Even tho he lost under part of teaser he pushed niners plus 3..when you have a two team teaser it is a no play if one side pushes and one side loses. The only losses on superbowl was 5 units on niners moneyline and 3 units on under for game..am i missing something? If you lose 1 part of a 2 team teaser it definately loses regardless of the other part pushing....are u serious? |
bluandbrneyes | 50 |
|
|
Braden Holtby is not an unknown backup goalie to anyone who actually watches hockey....he carried the caps in the playoffs last year.
Just saying.
|
KingScorpio | 19 |
|
|
I don't comment too often but I just thought I had to. Loving your picks..whenever we have the same lean its an auto bet for me.
Keep up the great work.
|
FinesFan | 301 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.