Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Should be interesting, my numbers have this as a fair line. So 50/50? I see Phx/Den (223 according to Covers NBA page) as the line that is off the most to the low side. |
smoothd20 | 76 |
|
|
But like you said Aussie, Davis is out which is their rim protector. Hopefully that will make scoring easier. That said, I like the over in this game. If the 216 that Covers is showing is a real number (I don't see one out yet) I think NO's pace and no Davis will make it so this is pushed over.
Quote Originally Posted by AussieDownUnder:
The line is Grizzlies -3 here in Oz with Davis out for a few games for the Pelicans. I couldn't not back this team at all Kush. Their scoring droughts are painful to watch and in this new era of basketball, its all about scoring which the Grizzlies cannot do well. But, I don't want to tell you what to do with your money buddy. If that is what you like, then you play it.. |
masterkush | 27 |
|
|
I've been following you for a week or so. Pretty impressive run. Keep it up. |
Manny6ix | 76 |
|
|
GL this week.
|
j-walk | 10 |
|
|
I'd be careful with USF and Indy. I could see a letdown from their last games.
|
GeorgE_5 | 4 |
|
|
Look at the bottom of page 1 (or maybe now top of page 2)
|
Cutback | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Blue_Magic: THE ONLY ONE I LIKE IS BC! +1 |
snowjocky | 28 |
|
|
I have a few faves. MSU is one as is Wake. Minny is right on the cusp of being a play too.
|
j-walk | 12 |
|
|
BOL to you. I think all of those are in my system as well. Wonder if it's the same principle. I have a few plays on faves as well though.
|
j-walk | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by craigchenalpga: Historically speaking, the Badgers generally have a tough time playing at Minnesota. Could have been the dome atmosphere and may have no effect with the new stadium. I'd say the Dome is less of a HFA than the new stadium is. Smaller capacity, easier to sell-out which means the crowd won't be 50-70% UW fans as in years past. On-campus stadium is renewing interest and I have a feeling 20% UW fans might even be a stretch. That said, I am not touching this game. |
husker_lee | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by polkaface: I'm bored so I went to SBRs odds area and found this. Big % Disparity and Big Opp movement Play Mia (OH) (66% WM, but 1 to 1.5 line move against) L Big % Disparity/Small movement (in opp. dir) (or no movement) Play on Ball State (65% on Army, no line movement) W Play on MN (60% on Cal, no movement) L Play on VA (63% on USM, line is either flat or moved vs USM .5) W Play Ore (62% Utah, line moved .5 against) W Play WSU (61% SMU, but line moved 1 against) W Play Pitt (63% Navy but .5 move against) W Play Marshall (56% BG but no movement) W Play NM (60% AF, no movement) L Play NM St (60% UTEP, no movement) L Big Line movement/Small % Disparity Play on UNC (52% on EC but 1.5 move in UNC dir) W Play OK (50/50 action but 2.5 line movement OK favor) W Play Syr (50/50 but 1 pt line move to SU) W Small % disp. and small opp. movement Play on BC (53% on Clemson, line moved .5 in opp way) L 9-5 just curious how it turned out. I might write this up again next week. |
kck05a | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Neef: 58% of public doesnt mean anything. Like people say..those all could be little wagers and the NUMBER of wagers, when the big money and lesser amount of wagers could be on the other side. Just a thought. But the point is... if 58% of the wagers are coming in on one side, and the line moves the other way guess what that means about which side the BIGGER BETS (i.e. sharp money/smart money/ NOT the recreational gambler) is on?!?!?! Now do you get it? |
kck05a | 35 |
|
|
I'm bored so I went to SBRs odds area and found this.
Big % Disparity and Big Opp movement Play Mia (OH) (66% WM, but 1 to 1.5 line move against) Big % Disparity/Small movement (in opp. dir) (or no movement) Play on Ball State (65% on Army, no line movement) Play on MN (60% on Cal, no movement) Play on VA (63% on USM, line is either flat or moved vs USM .5) Play Ore (62% Utah, line moved .5 against) Play WSU (61% SMU, but line moved 1 against) Play Pitt (63% Navy but .5 move against) Play Marshall (56% BG but no movement) Play NM (60% AF, no movement) Play NM St (60% UTEP, no movement) Big Line movement/Small % Disparity Play on UNC (52% on EC but 1.5 move in UNC dir) Play OK (50/50 action but 2.5 line movement OK favor) Play Syr (50/50 but 1 pt line move to SU) Small % disp. and small opp. movement Play on BC (53% on Clemson, line moved .5 in opp way) |
kck05a | 35 |
|
|
I like a good number of those also.
MSU
ND
TT
GT
NW
leaning towards playing Tulsa and Texas... staying away from others.
|
steckelb | 8 |
|
|
Texas just released a statement saying A.J. Abrams suffered a left foot injury late in Tuesday's practice and is out for tonight’s home game against TCU.
Abrams is UT's second-leading scorer (18.8 ppg), behind D.J. Augustin (19.8 ppg).
- From Dallas Morning News College blog.
|
polkaface | 1 |
|
|
This game jumped out at me too.
GL to us!!! ||an_cheers.gif' border=0>
|
PIDI | 33 |
|
|
Tony - SMU won last year on a 3pointer at the buzzer. Not sure where you got the double digits from.
|
freightdog | 10 |
|
|
I don't think Spurs -2.5 vs Rockets is "easy". Houston is a very good team, a 50+ win team. Portland is not.
Gotta love NO for the win and cover here.
|
aszzzbrokerman | 13 |
|
|
On the Suns with ya. ||clover.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>
|
EZMONEY4ME | 11 |
|
|
I like it.
|
Truth33 | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.