Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hope saints by 7 and u push this and win chargers +7.5 |
Hubahigh | 5 |
|
|
U should take saints -7 for half and guarantee a 2,500 profit |
Hubahigh | 5 |
|
|
seattle stays at 3,5 ,denver -5
|
billsneedhelp | 16 |
|
|
replied to
In BIG games whos the better QB Peyton or Tom? Or who you rather have on your team?
in NFL Betting
tom no question
|
MonkeyBallz | 13 |
|
|
|
trust-me | 6 |
|
|
ya cash88 ur a bum
|
James35 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by seattleseahawks: Wrong!!!! They are in the same division as SEA. One will be division champs, the other wild cards. I say in my threads before Sunday: If SF don't win this year SB, they will not win one before the SEAHAWKS!!!! They are getting old while SEA has one the youngest team in the NFL. SEA is built to win many years to come. So SF already lost their chance!!!! wrong 17 out of 22 starters are in their 20s plus seattle pass rush sucks
|
MagicBoy | 66 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner: John Elway disagrees with this. yes my friend u are correct! stupid haters(dillon24)
|
the_underdog | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Narco: Kapernick will never be in a Super Bowl again. Never. He is now exposed. That's what they call "scouting". A pocket passer will always win the longevity battle. Cap. Wilson. Are high risk for serious injuries (see rg3) U must be a rams fan. U fukn loser all of sudden ur on every thread talking bout how Sf sucks, losers like u don't last long in betting or life .I would love wilson or kaep can't go wrong with either one they both have bright futures
|
seattleseahawks | 25 |
|
|
|
CraftyAces | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jerzeyboy56: take the niners for 1100 ^this
|
ragingstorm | 25 |
|
|
|
MrZamboni | 33 |
|
|
replied to
SUPERBOWL HUGE HUE PLAY >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALTIMORE , BALTIMORE , BALTIMORE , BALTIMORE , BALTIMORE
in NFL Betting
SF it is LARGE
|
reservoir-dogs | 49 |
|
|
seattle is good but they will most likely be runner ups in division for fews years probably wild card every year.
o-line sf>sea defense sf>sea slightly cause SF lbs. and sea.no pass rush coach sf> sea rush sf=sea |
seattleseahawks | 20 |
|
|
|
pepa192 | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal: Mkuhi.....The 49'ers defense has been suspect almost all the playoffs (mostly last two games) What makes you think they can hold the Ravens to 3 scores? Everything I have watched from both Ravens offense and 49'ers D tells me that Ravens will put up around 24-28. 9'ers will get there share too even though I firmly believe the Ravens D is better. So I'm thinking Ravens absolute minimum of 21 points and 49'ers absolute minimum of 17.....thats 38 right there if game is very slow paced and neither offense can get clicking. Very small chance this happens IMO. That why I think under money is not the right side ravens defense is not better at any position ur a moron
|
Mkuhi | 20 |
|
|
gl
|
FSerpico | 19 |
|
|
replied to
The biggest loud mouth spouting off childish moron character of this forum in the past week
in NFL Betting
total agree biggest douche ever !!!!!
|
luckyhands | 12 |
|
|
sf played GB road NE road N.O. road NYG home SEA twice
MINN road not that easy |
terp4life | 33 |
|
|
replied to
Sign up here if you plan on wasting your money on the Ravens on February 3rd
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by rhh7: Strictly by the numbers, I calculate BAL 11.63 points over SF. NE is 6 points stronger than ATL. BAL beat NE by 15, SF beat ATL by 4. SF defense allows 27.5 Pts/G in the playoffs, BAL allows 19.0 Pts/G in the playoffs. Finally, look at the QB's. Flacco's postseason, 8 TD to 0 INT's, rating=114.7 Kaepernick's postseason, 3 TD to 1 INT, rating=105.9 Who would you rather have? I'll take Flacco and the Ravens! idiot
|
BigNiner | 130 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.