Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Never take advice on wagers from individuals who post IN ALL CAPITALS.
|
tedwalsh7 | 15 |
|
|
Colts ML =
Giants - 6.5 = Oak -2.5 = Dallas -6.5 (WOW) = Can't shake the .500... I'm going to change something up, these results won't work for me. |
SlumdogPicks | 8 |
|
|
Don't like the seattle/panthers line's at all, pat's line will probably hit but IMO more attractive lines are out there,
|
rg3skins | 23 |
|
|
Just bought N.Y. Giants for -6.5, Oakland -2.5, and Dallas -6.5... All 1 unit. For the Cowboys, I'm taking the risk on the higher spread, I like Seattle but I think Dallas is the better team.
Added underdog play: Colts ML = 1 Unit As for the parlay listed above, currently 1 correct, waiting for the jax. and denver game... Could be a profitable weekend fellas. |
SlumdogPicks | 8 |
|
|
I'm not so sure... Buffalo's D isn't too bad, at least as not as bad as they appear, yet the jets got 40+ on them... (Mind you the jets d played lights out).
Shut out is a bold prediction, and its not like the steelers are an offensive Juggernaut like the pats or gb on a usual day... Close game defensively, offensively steelers IMO... far from a shut out though. |
Exceller | 8 |
|
|
Don't over think it, pat's should cover. The problem is the spread is rather large, and in the NFL anything can happen, if Kolb starts he can play lights out or he can play bad.... too many factors. I don't think the cards are capable of covering this, unless special teams/defense some how gets a few points...
As mentioned earlier, tread cautiously.... so many more attractive lines out there. |
kevmode | 32 |
|
|
Colts are a solid underrated pick... IMO
|
chelseafan1 | 23 |
|
|
This is not even comparable to the pats line.... The titans are not an elite team this year, while the pats are. Anyone can argue and have a case that the Chicago bears and the Green bay packers are in fact elite teams, as well as it will be a lot closer.
In fact I'm on the bears to cover, should be close... |
tbarrera28 | 28 |
|
|
Nice man,
I think New Orleans is a solid pick this week IMO. |
SlumdogPicks | 8 |
|
|
I'll Post the teaser to start off:
$1333.00 wager for a net profit of $1000.00
|
SlumdogPicks | 8 |
|
|
Week 1 Picks
Hey all, after a uneventful week I see some lines that are very appealing. Lets get started? New Orleans -3 vs. Carolina Panthers +3 I really like New Orleans here. I'm going to put only 1 Unit down on this play as of now, but if the line drops to -2.5 I'll hit it a bit harder. Until then, 1 unit is the play. New Orleans is coming of a big loss at home, and quite honestly I think they are being undervalued due to this. Don't get me wrong, the skins deserved to win, and played great. But at -2.5 or -3 I see too much value in the saints, especially when they are going up against a different looking Carolina Offense. Something seems off with it, not quite sure. Could very well be a sophomore slump for newton but it's far too early to tell. Game Prediction: New Orleans 30 Carolina 21 That's it for now, but expect possible bets on these match ups with write ups to come. Dallas at Seattle Tampa Bay at New York Giants Oakland at Miami As well as a 13 point teaser that i LOVE atm. |
SlumdogPicks | 8 |
|
|
Thanks Chelseafan1, lets hope I can make it to week 3!
|
chelseafan1 | 23 |
|
|
New Orleans Saints -2.5
|
chelseafan1 | 23 |
|
|
hopefully you left gore in!
|
Bomboclatt | 6 |
|
|
I stayed away from that game fearing what had come to reality. Detroit are the ones who fucked me. Stafford played such a brutal game, I'm extremely disappointed. 160 dollar teaser with a 2000+ payout gone due to Detroit failing to establish a consistent offense.
|
Skanless1 | 9 |
|
|
Thanks for the update, pats were an easy pick. Lets for for another win next week fellas!
|
chelseafan1 | 83 |
|
|
New England at Tennessee = New England -6.5 (-110)
St Louis at Detroit = Detroit -9.0 (-110) New England -5.5 (-110) vs Tennessee +5.5 St. Louis +7 vs. Detroit -7 (-110) Risk $165.00 = Profit $2186.70 (Net Profit: $2021.xx) Indianapolis at Chicago = Chicago -10.0 (-110) New England at Tennessee = New England -6.5 (-110) St Louis at Detroit = Detroit -9.0 (-110) Miami at Houston = Houston -6.5 (-110) In the end essentially I'm down $165.00, which ultimately I'm pretty disappointed, not at the fact I lost that, but due to Detroit's poor play for majority of the game. They should have covered and it makes me even more mad they came back to win. In the end I think I would still do this play even if all the games had to be redone for whatever reason, good chance at a 2000+ profit, and I'm determined to hit a big payout next week, unfortunate but it happens fellas. On a side note, Washington played amazing... |
SlumdogPicks | 15 |
|
|
Johnson
Gore Decker Smith Jackson I prefer 3 rb's, although i am not ecstatic at fred jackson's match up, i'd throw him in the flex. |
Bomboclatt | 6 |
|
|
titans blow the pats outta the water, look at the superbowl loser ats inm week 1...
NOT. Pats are gunna break the trend. Everyone talked about how the giants were going to win due to the trend... look what happened. |
SixOneSeven | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lakers34kb: Why put a crappy team like the Vikings in there? that game is 50/50 all day |
TheDukies21 | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.