Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@sherriffics I didn’t ask what is SDQL I meant to ask what are the SDQL parameters you used for this bet ? I know what SDQL is and it’s a fine tool but if that’s all you’re using for your bets youre doomed |
sherriffics | 34 |
|
|
Just curious, what is the SDQL that qualifies the Cards for a bet ? No offense but relying on SDQL is no way to bet, evidenced by your losing record. SDQL doesn’t take in account the strength of a teams lineup, how rested their bullpen is, etc. But best of luck to you. your finger wagging struck a nerve with me I hope you’re right for your own sake |
sherriffics | 34 |
|
|
They weren’t swept in the first round it was actually the third round but to answer your question no I don’t see the lakers tanking and quite frankly I’m not sure the pelicans could beat the lakers even if the lakers tried to let them do so also Jamal Murray tweaked his ankle today against Memphis that could loom large as his health has always been an issue during his career |
UnderdogKing | 22 |
|
|
Best roster in the NBA is laughable |
JimmyGape | 16 |
|
|
Marvellous job |
rdam10 | 68 |
|
|
@rdam10 Thanks for clarifying and wow, I’m Canadian we are limited in how many sports book we can use as it’s a regulated market… the only book I see Arnaldi aces on is bet365 for 1.33 but they don’t let you modify the over under total games Lol I’ll have to do some sports book mixing and matching |
rdam10 | 68 |
|
|
Would you still take most aces for Arnaldi if it was a 3 way market, with a tie being a potential (and losing) possibility? And best of luck today thank you for posting your plays |
rdam10 | 68 |
|
|
|
rdam10 | 68 |
|
|
Denver probably |
Raidernator76 | 16 |
|
|
On fire today milk thank you
|
CrazyMilkMan | 21 |
|
|
Are we betting with pesos or what |
Devilplayer | 8 |
|
|
Salvaged my night on this game thank you had Portland +12 as well crazy they lost by 13 Theis hitting a couple big 3s very unlucky Lol |
StraightWagers | 6 |
|
|
YTD 1-0 +5 units back to the well Padres/dodgers u8.5 +100 to win 5u
|
SharpeBettor | 3 |
|
|
Milwaukee should’ve won if Dame wasn’t trash and Celtics didn’t get lucky from 3 |
westlake888 | 35 |
|
|
Stanton on roids Lol |
Martylee | 6 |
|
|
Dodgers/padres Under 8.5 -107 5u play
|
SharpeBettor | 3 |
|
|
lol |
StraightWagers | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao:
thats what happened to d rose sure but didn’t happen to Joakim Noah or Taj Gibson or Jimmy Butler… maybe D rose playing style was the bigger culprit than Thibs… Brunson plays below the rim I think he’ll be perfectly fine |
Zman55 | 5 |
|
|
4th match point is the charm… what a roller coaster of a match |
SharpeBettor | 4 |
|
|
I thought so too but paralyzed by disbelief I didn’t cash out my 3.2 Sakkari gonna let it ride… |
SharpeBettor | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.