Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@pjlvio
Tarleton was the team playing for revenge. That was a factor in betting Tarleton. If Tarleton had stomped Sucky U the first time then Tarleton might have had a cavalier attitude going into this game. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
@PayMeHardRock
Those 3's were crazy. When they weren't hitting them they were getting fouled and making all 3 free throws. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
@pjlvio That makes Tarleton a better bet, not a worse bet. Revenge is a powerful motivator. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
@Stryc9Nine The 3's are definitely making me nervous. The crap team is shooting 60% on a large volume. For the season they shoot 28.9%. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
@PayMeHardRock
I missed the early line. There are so many games to wade through. Then when I looked into Tarleton my eyes widened. So I did a same-game parlay. First half ml/game ml. And decided if Tarleton was losing I would use my 50% profit boost only available on an in-game CBB bet when I could bet the same parlay at plus money. So far so good. Though the first half was closer than I expected. Tarleton only shot 15% from 3 last game against these guys. Not gonna happen again, right? Tarleton was only 16% from 3 until a late 3 put them over 20%. Other team is over 50% on 3's and still losing. Hopefully Tarleton will rock to the dd win I expected. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
I know there's no such thing as a sure thing. You should know there's no such thing as a sure thing. But the closest thing to it I have seen in a while is Tarleton State. I wish this site let us search the content of posts. I'd love to see who has taken Tarleton. And if anyone has taken the crap team they are playing. In a revenge spot. With a shot at winning the conference there for Tarleton. With Tarleton on a roll. With the crap team they are playing playing worse lately. Don't bet what you can't afford to lose. EVER. |
irw | 14 |
|
|
@DeaconBlues2525 They are 'perfect score wins' games. If you don't get every single pick correct you don't win. I'm pretty sure in those two there was no choice of 'no goal scorer'. You had to pick somebody to score. So any game that ended in a 0-0 tie had no chance of producing a winner. In the most recent game there was a choice of 'no goal scorer', but I'm virtually certain there was no such choice earlier. |
irw | 9 |
|
|
@magicman1642 It's a pity there isn't an option to mute morons. And jerks. |
irw | 9 |
|
|
@irw Again. US 0 Portugal 0. No chance of winning. Had to pick a goal-scorer. |
irw | 9 |
|
|
Canada vs Nigeria. Score 0-0. Multiple people got everything right except their 'anytime goal scorer' pick was wrong. I thought it was dumb of people to pick a scoreless tie then pick a goal scorer. But covers must have required a pick for anytime goal scorer. No option to pick NONE. Which made it impossible to win if the score was 0-0. Or was there an option to pick NONE? |
irw | 9 |
|
|
@magicman1642 LOL. What a dumb response. |
reg1979 | 23 |
|
|
1. O 2. U 3. O 4. U 5. O 6. U 7. U 8. Garrett Wilson 9. Evan Neal 10. Kenny Pickett 11. U 12. O 13. 5 |
ColinMac | 33 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.