ever see it happen in reverse?
ever see the hot temper go off on someone 1st?
If so, did you say anything publically to the "offender" like you are in this thread?
ever see it happen in reverse?
ever see the hot temper go off on someone 1st?
If so, did you say anything publically to the "offender" like you are in this thread?
excuse me?
are you saying I am part of this group who incites him??
Back that up with proof if you are or else retract that opinion please.
what groups does he get along with? The ones that share his opinions of course and he then attacks anyone else who disagrees. That's the pattern I see but I dont spend as much time on here as I used to.
Ya know, your defense sounds like one that the Zimmerman fellow could use........
anyways, I could really give 2 shits.....just calling you for your obvious bias
carry on
excuse me?
are you saying I am part of this group who incites him??
Back that up with proof if you are or else retract that opinion please.
what groups does he get along with? The ones that share his opinions of course and he then attacks anyone else who disagrees. That's the pattern I see but I dont spend as much time on here as I used to.
Ya know, your defense sounds like one that the Zimmerman fellow could use........
anyways, I could really give 2 shits.....just calling you for your obvious bias
carry on
Lords never, ever did incite him. Rather he took the high road when the temper in question started bashing him out of the blue just for disagreeing with him.
Wall, do you find it a mere coincedence that I called you out for biased warnings six months ago?
I have an idea. wait for about a week. Then go hardline and give out warnings for every offense you come across. Lets see who gets the most warnings.
Lords never, ever did incite him. Rather he took the high road when the temper in question started bashing him out of the blue just for disagreeing with him.
Wall, do you find it a mere coincedence that I called you out for biased warnings six months ago?
I have an idea. wait for about a week. Then go hardline and give out warnings for every offense you come across. Lets see who gets the most warnings.
And Wall, please show me where I incited him here.
And Wall, please show me where I incited him here.
And Wall, please show me where I incited him here.
And Wall, please show me where I incited him here.
CD you have nothing to hide right?
This is a discussion with Wall and Lords to point out that you start bashing without provocation. He seems to think that you only get vile after being baited.
Just pointing out to him that you start bashing people simply because you disagree with them. Kinda childish wouldnt you agree?
CD you have nothing to hide right?
This is a discussion with Wall and Lords to point out that you start bashing without provocation. He seems to think that you only get vile after being baited.
Just pointing out to him that you start bashing people simply because you disagree with them. Kinda childish wouldnt you agree?
CD you have nothing to hide right?
This is a discussion with Wall and Lords to point out that you start bashing without provocation. He seems to think that you only get vile after being baited.
Just pointing out to him that you start bashing people simply because you disagree with them. Kinda childish wouldnt you agree?
CD you have nothing to hide right?
This is a discussion with Wall and Lords to point out that you start bashing without provocation. He seems to think that you only get vile after being baited.
Just pointing out to him that you start bashing people simply because you disagree with them. Kinda childish wouldnt you agree?
Part of the group that does what? Incites cd? Are you lumping me in a group now?
Have any facts to back up that I incite cd? Have any examples where I incite him regularly?
It may be easier to simply toss anyone who disagrees with cd into a group of baiters or haters but you are way off base with me my friend.
funny you say not to make things personal but feel its ok for you to project your opinions of me as fact
whatever wall, I am familair with your MO
Part of the group that does what? Incites cd? Are you lumping me in a group now?
Have any facts to back up that I incite cd? Have any examples where I incite him regularly?
It may be easier to simply toss anyone who disagrees with cd into a group of baiters or haters but you are way off base with me my friend.
funny you say not to make things personal but feel its ok for you to project your opinions of me as fact
whatever wall, I am familair with your MO
nah, ya see the problem I have with that is you only chose to see pile on threads when the "victim" has the same political leanings as you.
That is the only time I see you pull what you pulled in this thread. I have never seen you do it defense of someone who has a different political leaning than you.
Maybe you have and I missed it and if so good for you.
If not
nah, ya see the problem I have with that is you only chose to see pile on threads when the "victim" has the same political leanings as you.
That is the only time I see you pull what you pulled in this thread. I have never seen you do it defense of someone who has a different political leaning than you.
Maybe you have and I missed it and if so good for you.
If not
nah, ya see the problem I have with that is you only chose to see pile on threads when the "victim" has the same political leanings as you.
That is the only time I see you pull what you pulled in this thread. I have never seen you do it defense of someone who has a different political leaning than you.
Maybe you have and I missed it and if so good for you.
If not
nah, ya see the problem I have with that is you only chose to see pile on threads when the "victim" has the same political leanings as you.
That is the only time I see you pull what you pulled in this thread. I have never seen you do it defense of someone who has a different political leaning than you.
Maybe you have and I missed it and if so good for you.
If not
Wall, he is not the only one that has accused you of being biased.
Ya, sure its water under the bridge now.
I've pointed out some of the times he has attacked without provocation.
Not to overshadow my point right now..You have been accused of 'selective' warnings before. HMMM
Wall, he is not the only one that has accused you of being biased.
Ya, sure its water under the bridge now.
I've pointed out some of the times he has attacked without provocation.
Not to overshadow my point right now..You have been accused of 'selective' warnings before. HMMM
Wall, he is not the only one that has accused you of being biased.
Ya, sure its water under the bridge now.
I've pointed out some of the times he has attacked without provocation.
Not to overshadow my point right now..You have been accused of 'selective' warnings before. HMMM
Wall, he is not the only one that has accused you of being biased.
Ya, sure its water under the bridge now.
I've pointed out some of the times he has attacked without provocation.
Not to overshadow my point right now..You have been accused of 'selective' warnings before. HMMM
Thats easy DL36. Hes the other guy that rarely adds substance to his posts.
We have had this discussion before and I will submit that CD has problems with most people because of his tactics or MO.
If he merely engaged in congenial debate he would have very few problems. It is primarily because he bashes and calls names very quickly and usually only because he disagrees with that person.
Thats easy DL36. Hes the other guy that rarely adds substance to his posts.
We have had this discussion before and I will submit that CD has problems with most people because of his tactics or MO.
If he merely engaged in congenial debate he would have very few problems. It is primarily because he bashes and calls names very quickly and usually only because he disagrees with that person.
Fair enough but he brings alot of it on by the way he responds. If he wouldn't wear his emotions on his sleaves all the time it wouldn't be nearly as bad.
Fair enough but he brings alot of it on by the way he responds. If he wouldn't wear his emotions on his sleaves all the time it wouldn't be nearly as bad.
Wall, I have no prior or dealings with cd until just the other day but you say I am part of a group that incites him. That sir is not factual and that is my point.
As far as pulling a poltical card? - I am merely stating an observation based on your actions and who you defend in threads that you deem to be pile on. I may be wrong and if so please accept my apology.
I also dont interact with cd enough to know if he has many issues with others. I know how my convo went with him and have seen him and bowl joust but thats all I know of.
I also never claimed a particular group does the attacking-that was your claim.
Antagonized you? We may have debated and discussed issues and I know I have pointed to what I perceive as your bias when you defend someone but antagonize?
You and I have actually had many good discussions and debates and we actually agree on some things.
Anyways, like I said I really dont care except I dont appreciate the accusation that I entice another poster into an argument.
Wall, I have no prior or dealings with cd until just the other day but you say I am part of a group that incites him. That sir is not factual and that is my point.
As far as pulling a poltical card? - I am merely stating an observation based on your actions and who you defend in threads that you deem to be pile on. I may be wrong and if so please accept my apology.
I also dont interact with cd enough to know if he has many issues with others. I know how my convo went with him and have seen him and bowl joust but thats all I know of.
I also never claimed a particular group does the attacking-that was your claim.
Antagonized you? We may have debated and discussed issues and I know I have pointed to what I perceive as your bias when you defend someone but antagonize?
You and I have actually had many good discussions and debates and we actually agree on some things.
Anyways, like I said I really dont care except I dont appreciate the accusation that I entice another poster into an argument.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.