and now he is running to other threads to try to continue the discussion becasue he knows that is not capable of having a vitriol free analysis of his plays...
QUOTE Originally Posted by dl36:
and try posting your answer on this thread please...
You know sarasotaSpin is starting to lose it when he starts getting creapy with the catalog of all my posts that he stalks me with...
This guy is really a piece of work
Keep it up... you are totally winning by looking like a complete psycho-stalker....
are you going to create an alias and throw another " bump tantrum" like you always do when you get upset?
and now he is running to other threads to try to continue the discussion becasue he knows that is not capable of having a vitriol free analysis of his plays...
QUOTE Originally Posted by dl36:
and try posting your answer on this thread please...
You know sarasotaSpin is starting to lose it when he starts getting creapy with the catalog of all my posts that he stalks me with...
This guy is really a piece of work
Keep it up... you are totally winning by looking like a complete psycho-stalker....
are you going to create an alias and throw another " bump tantrum" like you always do when you get upset?
You know sarasotaSpin is starting to lose it when he starts getting creapy with the catalog of all my posts that he stalks me with...
This guy is really a piece of work
Keep it up... you are totally winning by looking like a complete psycho-stalker....
are you going to create an alias and throw another " bump tantrum" like you always do when you get upset?
U mad br0?
We all know who the stalker is ....I can't be the stalker when you are the one going into my threads bumping them no matter how old they are ..just tonight..
You know sarasotaSpin is starting to lose it when he starts getting creapy with the catalog of all my posts that he stalks me with...
This guy is really a piece of work
Keep it up... you are totally winning by looking like a complete psycho-stalker....
are you going to create an alias and throw another " bump tantrum" like you always do when you get upset?
U mad br0?
We all know who the stalker is ....I can't be the stalker when you are the one going into my threads bumping them no matter how old they are ..just tonight..
In what world is 53-47 a domination? What sport or competition would even consider something like that domination? That's not even outside of margin of error in the political world.
In what world is 53-47 a domination? What sport or competition would even consider something like that domination? That's not even outside of margin of error in the political world.
In what world is 53-47 a domination? What sport or competition would even consider something like that domination? That's not even outside of margin of error in the political world.
X-actly. Tell that to dl. He considers that an OVERWHELMING victory.
In what world is 53-47 a domination? What sport or competition would even consider something like that domination? That's not even outside of margin of error in the political world.
X-actly. Tell that to dl. He considers that an OVERWHELMING victory.
Still liking the +155 way better than your straight obama play. Only someone like you would make assessments on bets a month after the fact.
At the time of the original post, +200 on Newt/Mitt was way above market. +155 or something close to that with even more delegates was a much better play than you made.
I didn't tell you to hedge them (and I know you would have had difficulty with the math anyway). Both were above market options at that point. I don't claim to foretell the future, genius.
Had you mentioned that you thought RS could mess things up, I would have given you some credit, but right now you just look like some Friday morning quarterback.
Still liking the +155 way better than your straight obama play. Only someone like you would make assessments on bets a month after the fact.
At the time of the original post, +200 on Newt/Mitt was way above market. +155 or something close to that with even more delegates was a much better play than you made.
I didn't tell you to hedge them (and I know you would have had difficulty with the math anyway). Both were above market options at that point. I don't claim to foretell the future, genius.
Had you mentioned that you thought RS could mess things up, I would have given you some credit, but right now you just look like some Friday morning quarterback.
but that is is a true hedge.... in no way comparable to your swiss cheese roulette hedge... you even admit on your own thread that it is not a true hedge... so trying to compare it to a true hedge is not logical....
and the basic principles which I said earlier still stands...
1. the size of the bet needed for it to make it worth your while... especially at your -274 odds...
2. The length of time the money is tied up in the bet... especially considering the amount...
3. The liability of losing it all...
4. Your are failing on being vitriol free on your own thread...
I stand by what I say... and of course as always I am not afraid to be wrong if I am... but your basketball analogy is a fail....
read the thread... I said it is more like a soccer game where there are 3 outcomes of differing probability... win, lose, tie... and you are betting on two on a partial hedge leaving the least probably outcome wide open...
wouldnt you agree that the soccer analogy is more accurate then your basketball one?
but that is is a true hedge.... in no way comparable to your swiss cheese roulette hedge... you even admit on your own thread that it is not a true hedge... so trying to compare it to a true hedge is not logical....
and the basic principles which I said earlier still stands...
1. the size of the bet needed for it to make it worth your while... especially at your -274 odds...
2. The length of time the money is tied up in the bet... especially considering the amount...
3. The liability of losing it all...
4. Your are failing on being vitriol free on your own thread...
I stand by what I say... and of course as always I am not afraid to be wrong if I am... but your basketball analogy is a fail....
read the thread... I said it is more like a soccer game where there are 3 outcomes of differing probability... win, lose, tie... and you are betting on two on a partial hedge leaving the least probably outcome wide open...
wouldnt you agree that the soccer analogy is more accurate then your basketball one?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.