scal hockey is the ultimate roulette....
the puck bounces like a roulette ball!!
Unlike the NBA where 95% of the time the best team in the league wins the championship, in hockey any DECENT team has the same odds.
That's why they crown a new champ year after year and there are seldom multiple runs of a team winning it all ..
Its very random.
Not saying Kings aren't goin to win but its 50/50
scal hockey is the ultimate roulette....
the puck bounces like a roulette ball!!
Unlike the NBA where 95% of the time the best team in the league wins the championship, in hockey any DECENT team has the same odds.
That's why they crown a new champ year after year and there are seldom multiple runs of a team winning it all ..
Its very random.
Not saying Kings aren't goin to win but its 50/50
U should figure out another way of capping .Because you are certifiable crazy. The way you come up with this long winded theory is either the makings of a NUT or someone who is just throwing ideas against a wall and see if anyone agrees .. Kings win or not ,your post does not bring anyone on the fence to that conclusion ... Yes I like the Rangers ,but even if I didn't ,I would not take this post as a positive one .
As for the game very even match .IMO the goaltending as much as I would like to give it big time to HENRI ,is very close / KIngs have the bigger more physical players .Rangers got the speed . Coaches at this level are 90% of the time even (Glad Torts is gone ) Rangers do have that karma thing going on ,the emotion and the way people are getting on board that couldn't tell you what arena the Kings play in have added to the Ranger bandwagon that getting fuller by the minute . Rangers first of all thrive and play better as underdog ,way to much juice for any Finals in any sport IMO I also believe the 21 games played by the Kings is a big deal compared to the 20 the Rangers played that 21 st game meant 2 more time the Kings have to travel ,3 days less rest and that last game being the most wear and tear physically and mentally on the Kings ,being in a final game and OT with your season on the line .As far as the -170 and the wacky correlation to the stock market ,yes it might be a 58% return ,but that's if you win ,stocks don't go higher or to zero ,and you don't have to lay $170 to buy a $100 stock moron . And unlike a bet you can dump your stock if you want when its down10% if you choose .. Usually when someone starts off with ther biggest bet crap it has a long history of losing (especially posted on covers).If I was a KIngs fan ,I wouldn't be happy reading the post you presented and having you on my side RANGERS in 6
U should figure out another way of capping .Because you are certifiable crazy. The way you come up with this long winded theory is either the makings of a NUT or someone who is just throwing ideas against a wall and see if anyone agrees .. Kings win or not ,your post does not bring anyone on the fence to that conclusion ... Yes I like the Rangers ,but even if I didn't ,I would not take this post as a positive one .
As for the game very even match .IMO the goaltending as much as I would like to give it big time to HENRI ,is very close / KIngs have the bigger more physical players .Rangers got the speed . Coaches at this level are 90% of the time even (Glad Torts is gone ) Rangers do have that karma thing going on ,the emotion and the way people are getting on board that couldn't tell you what arena the Kings play in have added to the Ranger bandwagon that getting fuller by the minute . Rangers first of all thrive and play better as underdog ,way to much juice for any Finals in any sport IMO I also believe the 21 games played by the Kings is a big deal compared to the 20 the Rangers played that 21 st game meant 2 more time the Kings have to travel ,3 days less rest and that last game being the most wear and tear physically and mentally on the Kings ,being in a final game and OT with your season on the line .As far as the -170 and the wacky correlation to the stock market ,yes it might be a 58% return ,but that's if you win ,stocks don't go higher or to zero ,and you don't have to lay $170 to buy a $100 stock moron . And unlike a bet you can dump your stock if you want when its down10% if you choose .. Usually when someone starts off with ther biggest bet crap it has a long history of losing (especially posted on covers).If I was a KIngs fan ,I wouldn't be happy reading the post you presented and having you on my side RANGERS in 6
U should figure out another way of capping .Because you are certifiable crazy. The way you come up with this long winded theory is either the makings of a NUT or someone who is just throwing ideas against a wall and see if anyone agrees .. Kings win or not ,your post does not bring anyone on the fence to that conclusion ... Yes I like the Rangers ,but even if I didn't ,I would not take this post as a positive one .
As for the game very even match .IMO the goaltending as much as I would like to give it big time to HENRI ,is very close / KIngs have the bigger more physical players .Rangers got the speed . Coaches at this level are 90% of the time even (Glad Torts is gone ) Rangers do have that karma thing going on ,the emotion and the way people are getting on board that couldn't tell you what arena the Kings play in have added to the Ranger bandwagon that getting fuller by the minute . Rangers first of all thrive and play better as underdog ,way to much juice for any Finals in any sport IMO I also believe the 21 games played by the Kings is a big deal compared to the 20 the Rangers played that 21 st game meant 2 more time the Kings have to travel ,3 days less rest and that last game being the most wear and tear physically and mentally on the Kings ,being in a final game and OT with your season on the line .As far as the -170 and the wacky correlation to the stock market ,yes it might be a 58% return ,but that's if you win ,stocks don't go higher or to zero ,and you don't have to lay $170 to buy a $100 stock moron . And unlike a bet you can dump your stock if you want when its down10% if you choose .. Usually when someone starts off with ther biggest bet crap it has a long history of losing (especially posted on covers).If I was a KIngs fan ,I wouldn't be happy reading the post you presented and having you on my side RANGERS in 6
U should figure out another way of capping .Because you are certifiable crazy. The way you come up with this long winded theory is either the makings of a NUT or someone who is just throwing ideas against a wall and see if anyone agrees .. Kings win or not ,your post does not bring anyone on the fence to that conclusion ... Yes I like the Rangers ,but even if I didn't ,I would not take this post as a positive one .
As for the game very even match .IMO the goaltending as much as I would like to give it big time to HENRI ,is very close / KIngs have the bigger more physical players .Rangers got the speed . Coaches at this level are 90% of the time even (Glad Torts is gone ) Rangers do have that karma thing going on ,the emotion and the way people are getting on board that couldn't tell you what arena the Kings play in have added to the Ranger bandwagon that getting fuller by the minute . Rangers first of all thrive and play better as underdog ,way to much juice for any Finals in any sport IMO I also believe the 21 games played by the Kings is a big deal compared to the 20 the Rangers played that 21 st game meant 2 more time the Kings have to travel ,3 days less rest and that last game being the most wear and tear physically and mentally on the Kings ,being in a final game and OT with your season on the line .As far as the -170 and the wacky correlation to the stock market ,yes it might be a 58% return ,but that's if you win ,stocks don't go higher or to zero ,and you don't have to lay $170 to buy a $100 stock moron . And unlike a bet you can dump your stock if you want when its down10% if you choose .. Usually when someone starts off with ther biggest bet crap it has a long history of losing (especially posted on covers).If I was a KIngs fan ,I wouldn't be happy reading the post you presented and having you on my side RANGERS in 6
scal hockey is the ultimate roulette....
the puck bounces like a roulette ball!!
Unlike the NBA where 95% of the time the best team in the league wins the championship, in hockey any DECENT team has the same odds.
That's why they crown a new champ year after year and there are seldom multiple runs of a team winning it all ..
Its very random.
Not saying Kings aren't goin to win but its 50/50
yea but does the nba win by the point spread 95% of the time?talk about a roulette ball
scal hockey is the ultimate roulette....
the puck bounces like a roulette ball!!
Unlike the NBA where 95% of the time the best team in the league wins the championship, in hockey any DECENT team has the same odds.
That's why they crown a new champ year after year and there are seldom multiple runs of a team winning it all ..
Its very random.
Not saying Kings aren't goin to win but its 50/50
yea but does the nba win by the point spread 95% of the time?talk about a roulette ball
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.