I terms of who everyone is playing. The forum seems completely split and lots of consistent cappers on either side of the coin., I see lots of great arguments for both sides for sure. And its tough to see which arguments will come to fruition and which ones won't.
may be a little to early to analyze vegasinsider consensus or any other site that tracks this
FWIW, my book opened at -1 pats and was bet down to currently at a pk on both sides.
I terms of who everyone is playing. The forum seems completely split and lots of consistent cappers on either side of the coin., I see lots of great arguments for both sides for sure. And its tough to see which arguments will come to fruition and which ones won't.
may be a little to early to analyze vegasinsider consensus or any other site that tracks this
FWIW, my book opened at -1 pats and was bet down to currently at a pk on both sides.
easy huh?...lol...easy as coming bk from behind,@ hone,with those weenies "12th man",??...don't b so sure pal...they cdnt stop the pack,they can't stop these guys...
easy huh?...lol...easy as coming bk from behind,@ hone,with those weenies "12th man",??...don't b so sure pal...they cdnt stop the pack,they can't stop these guys...
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree, Vegas didn't make a mistake with their power rating system, they made a mistake with the public's perception of the 2 teams.
At the end of the day Vegas rolls the public's perception in this game...................................................
Disagree. Vegas books made a mistake with their power rating system which created an opening number of Seattle -2.5.....All the big money drive that number down to a PK quicker than any line move I've ever seen
Disagree, Vegas didn't make a mistake with their power rating system, they made a mistake with the public's perception of the 2 teams.
At the end of the day Vegas rolls the public's perception in this game...................................................
Disagree, Vegas didn't make a mistake with their power rating system, they made a mistake with the public's perception of the 2 teams.
At the end of the day Vegas rolls the public's perception in this game...................................................
I disagree, the public perception at that time was Pats are a great team and sea looked God awful vs packers. Go back and see both games again if you have to. Something else took a big chunk out of that +2.5.
Disagree, Vegas didn't make a mistake with their power rating system, they made a mistake with the public's perception of the 2 teams.
At the end of the day Vegas rolls the public's perception in this game...................................................
I disagree, the public perception at that time was Pats are a great team and sea looked God awful vs packers. Go back and see both games again if you have to. Something else took a big chunk out of that +2.5.
WRs for Seattle will be shown to be mediocre. With an above avg QB . Who has a below avg arm. He will be spied, blitzed, and prevented to roll out. Bellichevk will take away what Seattle does the best. I can't say the same for Pete Carroll. That GB defense wasn't 86 bears on Sunday you know,
WRs for Seattle will be shown to be mediocre. With an above avg QB . Who has a below avg arm. He will be spied, blitzed, and prevented to roll out. Bellichevk will take away what Seattle does the best. I can't say the same for Pete Carroll. That GB defense wasn't 86 bears on Sunday you know,
WRs for Seattle will be shown to be mediocre. With an above avg QB . Who has a below avg arm. He will be spied, blitzed, and prevented to roll out. Bellichevk will take away what Seattle does the best. I can't say the same for Pete Carroll. That GB defense wasn't 86 bears on Sunday you know,
WRs for Seattle will be shown to be mediocre. With an above avg QB . Who has a below avg arm. He will be spied, blitzed, and prevented to roll out. Bellichevk will take away what Seattle does the best. I can't say the same for Pete Carroll. That GB defense wasn't 86 bears on Sunday you know,
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.