eagles' run d actually isn't that bad, so they will force fitzpatrick to beat them with his arm, which i'm not toooo sure is going to happen even if the eagles secondary is shaky
jets d is legit, but it's got 10 turnovers in 2 games so far, and i'm not sure how that can continue. also, they blitz a lot, which is actually the one kind of defense the eagles' hurry up offense might actually work well against.
also, during the 2nd half of the falcons game, chip solved the blitz(falcons run one too, right?) by running a ton of screen passes to sproles. he won't take a whole half to adjust this time again.
eagles' run d actually isn't that bad, so they will force fitzpatrick to beat them with his arm, which i'm not toooo sure is going to happen even if the eagles secondary is shaky
jets d is legit, but it's got 10 turnovers in 2 games so far, and i'm not sure how that can continue. also, they blitz a lot, which is actually the one kind of defense the eagles' hurry up offense might actually work well against.
also, during the 2nd half of the falcons game, chip solved the blitz(falcons run one too, right?) by running a ton of screen passes to sproles. he won't take a whole half to adjust this time again.
It didn't look like an upset to me. The Jets dominated that game. They never trailed, and won by thirteen. The Jets kicked their behind period. The bookies are putting out a lot of bullshit lines for the pros. The underdogs won outright ten games wk 2. New England was an underdog. Is that bullshit or what. The bookies know most people bet the faves because they don't have to do any studying. I bet against the jets in a preseason game...on Arizona I think, but they got beat up both halves. Then I found out why that jets team looked so good. It's Todd Bowles. Ex D coordinator for Arizona now head coach. Won't be betting against jets any time soon. More bullshit lines, and upsets to come. Philly was favored by 2.5 during Jets Monday night game. The books shut it down during the game and made the Jets 2.5 faves after the game.
Not sure if you noticed but I posted that BEFORE the game even started. It looked like a pretty significant upset to me as I collected +220 on the ML. I knew they were the better team but the odds didnt reflect that....hence the word 'upset'.....as for this game I may lay off entirely getting less and less confident in Eagles but love the situation. GL
It didn't look like an upset to me. The Jets dominated that game. They never trailed, and won by thirteen. The Jets kicked their behind period. The bookies are putting out a lot of bullshit lines for the pros. The underdogs won outright ten games wk 2. New England was an underdog. Is that bullshit or what. The bookies know most people bet the faves because they don't have to do any studying. I bet against the jets in a preseason game...on Arizona I think, but they got beat up both halves. Then I found out why that jets team looked so good. It's Todd Bowles. Ex D coordinator for Arizona now head coach. Won't be betting against jets any time soon. More bullshit lines, and upsets to come. Philly was favored by 2.5 during Jets Monday night game. The books shut it down during the game and made the Jets 2.5 faves after the game.
Not sure if you noticed but I posted that BEFORE the game even started. It looked like a pretty significant upset to me as I collected +220 on the ML. I knew they were the better team but the odds didnt reflect that....hence the word 'upset'.....as for this game I may lay off entirely getting less and less confident in Eagles but love the situation. GL
Agree with Eagles...not to mention Jets with a big road game @ Mia on deck, Revis banged up, public perception about as low as it can get on the iggles. BOL
Agree with Eagles...not to mention Jets with a big road game @ Mia on deck, Revis banged up, public perception about as low as it can get on the iggles. BOL
Last week, before Week 2's games, this spread was Eagles -3.5
Somehow, based on 60 minutes of action, the line moved by six points. Did the Eagles "become" six points worse during the game? Did the Jets "become" six points better during the game?
I have a hard time believing that an NFL spread should move six points as a result of one game.
Betting the NFL is about numbers. Play good ones and don't chase bad ones.
Good luck with whichever side you choose.
Some great philosphy in this post. Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
Last week, before Week 2's games, this spread was Eagles -3.5
Somehow, based on 60 minutes of action, the line moved by six points. Did the Eagles "become" six points worse during the game? Did the Jets "become" six points better during the game?
I have a hard time believing that an NFL spread should move six points as a result of one game.
Betting the NFL is about numbers. Play good ones and don't chase bad ones.
Good luck with whichever side you choose.
Some great philosphy in this post. Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.