I believe that you win at this, and I don't believe a lot of the people who SAY they win on this site, so i'm not going to pretend to be able to teach you anything but you are making something important that really isn't important at all.
I win easily in NBA, don't really have to think about it much plus there are reliable stats. Been crappy in NFL tho. So I tailed a few of your picks and your analysis was pretty good the games went the way you said, but I digress on one point
They set the numbers just enough for the volume to take the wrong side.
They did that last night and it was the wrong side. They set the line at 105. The true line is 103.5 You and I both knew that so did they. Anyone who has capped basketball long enough knew. But they anticipated heavy action on the over and set it at 105, I hit that early because I had 103 with high probability of covering due to action flow of first half the number of shots taken in an NBA game is consistent, yada yada.
Sure enough the house was right, people bet the over it closed at 105.5 I took it again and also took OKC TTu 52 when it ticked up.
The fact is the only thing that mattered was the posted line vs true line, the rest is bunk. JMO
Was good talking to you. I might be around tonight. Maybe I can tail your plays. Lo. Most of mine are already in. I'm leaning to more unders tonight in the nba. Bol
I believe that you win at this, and I don't believe a lot of the people who SAY they win on this site, so i'm not going to pretend to be able to teach you anything but you are making something important that really isn't important at all.
I win easily in NBA, don't really have to think about it much plus there are reliable stats. Been crappy in NFL tho. So I tailed a few of your picks and your analysis was pretty good the games went the way you said, but I digress on one point
They set the numbers just enough for the volume to take the wrong side.
They did that last night and it was the wrong side. They set the line at 105. The true line is 103.5 You and I both knew that so did they. Anyone who has capped basketball long enough knew. But they anticipated heavy action on the over and set it at 105, I hit that early because I had 103 with high probability of covering due to action flow of first half the number of shots taken in an NBA game is consistent, yada yada.
Sure enough the house was right, people bet the over it closed at 105.5 I took it again and also took OKC TTu 52 when it ticked up.
The fact is the only thing that mattered was the posted line vs true line, the rest is bunk. JMO
Was good talking to you. I might be around tonight. Maybe I can tail your plays. Lo. Most of mine are already in. I'm leaning to more unders tonight in the nba. Bol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.