This is Straightshitter's MO. Racist, Racist, Racist, Racist with little to no substance or sense in between. Train-ing Bra69 suffers from the same infantile libel line as well in his quest to defame without an argument. They believe that if they can discredit you sufficiently by sullying your character, then a reasonable defense of their stance doesn't matter (not that it existed anyhow).
Scalabrine siding with a guy that referred to black people as “fucking monkeys” and called him “scaladouchebag” about 7 hours ago.
This is Straightshitter's MO. Racist, Racist, Racist, Racist with little to no substance or sense in between. Train-ing Bra69 suffers from the same infantile libel line as well in his quest to defame without an argument. They believe that if they can discredit you sufficiently by sullying your character, then a reasonable defense of their stance doesn't matter (not that it existed anyhow).
Scalabrine siding with a guy that referred to black people as “fucking monkeys” and called him “scaladouchebag” about 7 hours ago.
What is your theory on where all the animals are going to get their food if their populations skyrocket?
Also what is your theory on how human fatalities involving vehicles and animals on the road wouldn’t go up if the animal population went through the roof?
What is your theory on where all the animals are going to get their food if their populations skyrocket?
Also what is your theory on how human fatalities involving vehicles and animals on the road wouldn’t go up if the animal population went through the roof?
I think you should go get your head examined. Nothing in any of those threads suggests that I am A. racist or B. a pedophile.
Deal with it.
Referring to black people as “fucking monkeys” isn’t racist and saying you want to “take a room” with an 8 year old child doesn’t mean you like children?
You’re probably the type of person that casually calls all black people the N word and thinks nothing of it.
I think you should go get your head examined. Nothing in any of those threads suggests that I am A. racist or B. a pedophile.
Deal with it.
Referring to black people as “fucking monkeys” isn’t racist and saying you want to “take a room” with an 8 year old child doesn’t mean you like children?
You’re probably the type of person that casually calls all black people the N word and thinks nothing of it.
So you acknowledge that killing animals is inhumane with that second to last sentence fragment...
But you still do it. And teach your child to do it. Interesting.
It is a very simple-minded approach to come into a thread about animal slaughter and essentially say, "since I kill it, I can eat it." The reasonable question that could follow would be, "I eat the dogs I dogfight or shoot." Of course dogfighting is cruel and unusual but who is a hunter to judge when he doesn't get off a clean shot and blows a leg, or ear or hind-quarter off and the animal bleeds to death over several hours. Maybe the animal is maimed and can't be self-sufficient, which could be several days before death due to starvation. One dog-fighting match, which dogs were specialized in, seems to be on equal terms with this comparison. This doesn't even broach the issue of bow-hunting.
The "I'm a hunter therefore I can kill for food" line of thinking solves nothing. Then again, there isn't much thinking involved when people eat meat especially when it's glamorized by the restaurant and fast food industry or by the ultra-masculine hunting episodes with fancy gun and bullet names as long as personalized license plates.
Wow. A racist, liberal, whining box ginger....just what this world needs more of. So now its bad for a man to feed his family? People have been "living off the land" since the beginning of time. Hell, God got some ribs from Adam.
You are a sad man Scal....actually pathetic is a better word.
So you acknowledge that killing animals is inhumane with that second to last sentence fragment...
But you still do it. And teach your child to do it. Interesting.
It is a very simple-minded approach to come into a thread about animal slaughter and essentially say, "since I kill it, I can eat it." The reasonable question that could follow would be, "I eat the dogs I dogfight or shoot." Of course dogfighting is cruel and unusual but who is a hunter to judge when he doesn't get off a clean shot and blows a leg, or ear or hind-quarter off and the animal bleeds to death over several hours. Maybe the animal is maimed and can't be self-sufficient, which could be several days before death due to starvation. One dog-fighting match, which dogs were specialized in, seems to be on equal terms with this comparison. This doesn't even broach the issue of bow-hunting.
The "I'm a hunter therefore I can kill for food" line of thinking solves nothing. Then again, there isn't much thinking involved when people eat meat especially when it's glamorized by the restaurant and fast food industry or by the ultra-masculine hunting episodes with fancy gun and bullet names as long as personalized license plates.
Wow. A racist, liberal, whining box ginger....just what this world needs more of. So now its bad for a man to feed his family? People have been "living off the land" since the beginning of time. Hell, God got some ribs from Adam.
You are a sad man Scal....actually pathetic is a better word.
While I don't hunt myself or really believe in it, I do have several friends that do hunt and I have yet for them to tell me any hunting stories of how they purposely blew a deers leg off just so they could torture it by electrocuting it with a cattle prod and then beat it with a stick until it died.
This thread is a miserable fail in trying to connect a dog torturing felon in Michael Vick to hunting wild animals.
While I don't hunt myself or really believe in it, I do have several friends that do hunt and I have yet for them to tell me any hunting stories of how they purposely blew a deers leg off just so they could torture it by electrocuting it with a cattle prod and then beat it with a stick until it died.
This thread is a miserable fail in trying to connect a dog torturing felon in Michael Vick to hunting wild animals.
While I don't hunt myself or really believe in it, I do have several friends that do hunt and I have yet for them to tell me any hunting stories of how they purposely blew a deers leg off just so they could torture it by electrocuting it with a cattle prod and then beat it with a stick until it died.
This thread is a miserable fail in trying to connect a dog torturing felon in Michael Vick to hunting wild animals.
You are complicit in the lifelong torture and slaughter of billions of animals if you eat meat because you're are a driving force behind it, that is, a consumer.
Just because man has domesticated a dog within his household and shows affection for it does not mean it is any less important or less nutritious as any other animal.
It is basic historical fact that the dominant intellectual culture of a society serves the interest of the dominant groups in that society. Because those groups favor dog ownership and criminalize dog fighting, you somehow connect this to moral certitude with regard to judging Vick and justifying your meat-eating lifestyle. This is, of course, a fallacy when examined with anything more than a simple-minded approach.
Because meat-eating is both culture and habit, you refuse to be introspective about it. Ultimately, you cheat yourself and the lives you take.
While I don't hunt myself or really believe in it, I do have several friends that do hunt and I have yet for them to tell me any hunting stories of how they purposely blew a deers leg off just so they could torture it by electrocuting it with a cattle prod and then beat it with a stick until it died.
This thread is a miserable fail in trying to connect a dog torturing felon in Michael Vick to hunting wild animals.
You are complicit in the lifelong torture and slaughter of billions of animals if you eat meat because you're are a driving force behind it, that is, a consumer.
Just because man has domesticated a dog within his household and shows affection for it does not mean it is any less important or less nutritious as any other animal.
It is basic historical fact that the dominant intellectual culture of a society serves the interest of the dominant groups in that society. Because those groups favor dog ownership and criminalize dog fighting, you somehow connect this to moral certitude with regard to judging Vick and justifying your meat-eating lifestyle. This is, of course, a fallacy when examined with anything more than a simple-minded approach.
Because meat-eating is both culture and habit, you refuse to be introspective about it. Ultimately, you cheat yourself and the lives you take.
Wow. A racist, liberal, whining box ginger....just what this world needs more of. So now its bad for a man to feed his family? People have been "living off the land" since the beginning of time. Hell, God got some ribs from Adam.
You are a sad man Scal....actually pathetic is a better word.
Ah, good ol 'feed his family' argument. It doesn't get any lower than that.
Wow. A racist, liberal, whining box ginger....just what this world needs more of. So now its bad for a man to feed his family? People have been "living off the land" since the beginning of time. Hell, God got some ribs from Adam.
You are a sad man Scal....actually pathetic is a better word.
Ah, good ol 'feed his family' argument. It doesn't get any lower than that.
Do you hunt? Any of you? Ask a Maine or NH Moose Lottery hunter. Hunting is a SKILL that one learns....same as fishing. Give a fisherman a fishing rod and a hunter a bow and arrow or gun and they'll provide for themselves. So to answer your question about what is the difference between hunting and dog fighting? The STATE gets their fee, ask a Maine or NH Moose hunter. Dog fighting can go on for a considerable duration which is considered inhumane. When a dog dies they are just discarded but when an animal such as deer are taken the duration is very fast (humane) and the carcass is eaten. Lastly there wouldn't be dog fighting if retards didn't bet on it but there will always be hunting because hunters can sell their scraps to the people with no skill.
Do you hunt? Any of you? Ask a Maine or NH Moose Lottery hunter. Hunting is a SKILL that one learns....same as fishing. Give a fisherman a fishing rod and a hunter a bow and arrow or gun and they'll provide for themselves. So to answer your question about what is the difference between hunting and dog fighting? The STATE gets their fee, ask a Maine or NH Moose hunter. Dog fighting can go on for a considerable duration which is considered inhumane. When a dog dies they are just discarded but when an animal such as deer are taken the duration is very fast (humane) and the carcass is eaten. Lastly there wouldn't be dog fighting if retards didn't bet on it but there will always be hunting because hunters can sell their scraps to the people with no skill.
So by your logic then anyone who eats the flesh of another animal should be allowed to hold dog fights and then torture them to death if they lose their fight?
And all of this time I was under the impression that dog fighting and torturing animals was illegal. I was unaware the Mike Vick was just a victim in all of this.
So by your logic then anyone who eats the flesh of another animal should be allowed to hold dog fights and then torture them to death if they lose their fight?
And all of this time I was under the impression that dog fighting and torturing animals was illegal. I was unaware the Mike Vick was just a victim in all of this.
I guarantee if someone secretly video taped 4 "white" hunters torturing a deer using various barbaric devices, they would all go down just as Vick did.
I guarantee if someone secretly video taped 4 "white" hunters torturing a deer using various barbaric devices, they would all go down just as Vick did.
Referring to black people as “fucking monkeys” isn’t racist and saying you want to “take a room” with an 8 year old child doesn’t mean you like children?
You’re probably the type of person that casually calls all black people the N word and thinks nothing of it.
I said I wanna take a room with an 8 year old kid? Notice how you are the only one making these claims?
Please read scals post, number 43 in case you forgot. You really are brain dead.
Referring to black people as “fucking monkeys” isn’t racist and saying you want to “take a room” with an 8 year old child doesn’t mean you like children?
You’re probably the type of person that casually calls all black people the N word and thinks nothing of it.
I said I wanna take a room with an 8 year old kid? Notice how you are the only one making these claims?
Please read scals post, number 43 in case you forgot. You really are brain dead.
This
is Straightshitter's MO. Racist, Racist, Racist, Racist with little to
no substance or sense in between. Train-ing Bra69 suffers from the same
infantile libel line as well in his quest to defame without an argument.
They believe that if they can discredit you sufficiently by sullying
your character, then a reasonable defense of their stance doesn't matter
(not that it existed anyhow).
This
is Straightshitter's MO. Racist, Racist, Racist, Racist with little to
no substance or sense in between. Train-ing Bra69 suffers from the same
infantile libel line as well in his quest to defame without an argument.
They believe that if they can discredit you sufficiently by sullying
your character, then a reasonable defense of their stance doesn't matter
(not that it existed anyhow).
So by your logic then anyone who eats the flesh of another animal should be allowed to hold dog fights and then torture them to death if they lose their fight?
And all of this time I was under the impression that dog fighting and torturing animals was illegal. I was unaware the Mike Vick was just a victim in all of this.
Quite the opposite, I'm personally indicting both meat eaters and dog fighters of a similar 'crime' against another species. That crime would be the exploitation and slaughter of another living thing for profit and/or pleasure. Hunters here are clearly being very lenient in terms of the 'humaneness' of the slaughter and the length of time it takes to be killed, but I'm saying the killing shouldn't take place at all. Also, I do not think either 'crime', as I personally have defined it, deserves even a single hour of incarceration by any government.
So by your logic then anyone who eats the flesh of another animal should be allowed to hold dog fights and then torture them to death if they lose their fight?
And all of this time I was under the impression that dog fighting and torturing animals was illegal. I was unaware the Mike Vick was just a victim in all of this.
Quite the opposite, I'm personally indicting both meat eaters and dog fighters of a similar 'crime' against another species. That crime would be the exploitation and slaughter of another living thing for profit and/or pleasure. Hunters here are clearly being very lenient in terms of the 'humaneness' of the slaughter and the length of time it takes to be killed, but I'm saying the killing shouldn't take place at all. Also, I do not think either 'crime', as I personally have defined it, deserves even a single hour of incarceration by any government.
Quite the opposite, I'm personally indicting both meat eaters and dog fighters of a similar 'crime' against another species. That crime would be the exploitation and slaughter of another living thing for profit and/or pleasure. Hunters here are clearly being very lenient in terms of the 'humaneness' of the slaughter and the length of time it takes to be killed, but I'm saying the killing shouldn't take place at all. Also, I do not think either 'crime', as I personally have defined it, deserves even a single hour of incarceration by any government.
Those "crimes" are hardly similar. C'mon scal. You can't really believe that.
Quite the opposite, I'm personally indicting both meat eaters and dog fighters of a similar 'crime' against another species. That crime would be the exploitation and slaughter of another living thing for profit and/or pleasure. Hunters here are clearly being very lenient in terms of the 'humaneness' of the slaughter and the length of time it takes to be killed, but I'm saying the killing shouldn't take place at all. Also, I do not think either 'crime', as I personally have defined it, deserves even a single hour of incarceration by any government.
Those "crimes" are hardly similar. C'mon scal. You can't really believe that.
I guarantee if someone secretly video taped 4 "white" hunters torturing a deer using various barbaric devices, they would all go down just as Vick did.
Really? There are examples wild animals being tortured in the face of local governments for sport right now. None of these people have or ever will face a court date like Vick did:
I guarantee if someone secretly video taped 4 "white" hunters torturing a deer using various barbaric devices, they would all go down just as Vick did.
Really? There are examples wild animals being tortured in the face of local governments for sport right now. None of these people have or ever will face a court date like Vick did:
This is quite possibly the worst disaster of a thread I have seen in a long while...
Killing animals is a way of life. People will do it and you need to get over it, because you wouldn't be here if your ancestors didn't do it.
Being a fucking vegetarian doesn't help your case because killing a plant to eat it is still killing a living organism whether you consume it or not.
The thing that is fucked up about dog fighting is not that you are killing a dog---people euthanize dogs for shitty reasons all the time...the torture of the dog is not a good thing.
Slaughterhouses are not good either if the animals are raised under terrible circumstances before slaughter, but there are good-natured farmers that treat their cattle, pork and whatever justly.
The argument isn't, to kill or not to kill, it's the way in which the killing occurs.
Dog fighting is completely reckless and ridiculous...just like cockfighting is illegal as well.
Staging a poker game in your household is illegal as well, let's not forget that providing an atmosphere of illegal gaming IN ANY WAY is ILLEGAL, ON TOP of the fact that Vick and friends were torturing these dogs.
This is quite possibly the worst disaster of a thread I have seen in a long while...
Killing animals is a way of life. People will do it and you need to get over it, because you wouldn't be here if your ancestors didn't do it.
Being a fucking vegetarian doesn't help your case because killing a plant to eat it is still killing a living organism whether you consume it or not.
The thing that is fucked up about dog fighting is not that you are killing a dog---people euthanize dogs for shitty reasons all the time...the torture of the dog is not a good thing.
Slaughterhouses are not good either if the animals are raised under terrible circumstances before slaughter, but there are good-natured farmers that treat their cattle, pork and whatever justly.
The argument isn't, to kill or not to kill, it's the way in which the killing occurs.
Dog fighting is completely reckless and ridiculous...just like cockfighting is illegal as well.
Staging a poker game in your household is illegal as well, let's not forget that providing an atmosphere of illegal gaming IN ANY WAY is ILLEGAL, ON TOP of the fact that Vick and friends were torturing these dogs.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.