Please someone explain to me why one is worse than another. Before anyone accuses me of being a Vick apologist - I HATE Vick and to add a caveat I'm not a dog person. But really shooting a buck between the eyes or electrocuting a dog. Everyone of my friends uses two arguements.
1. Cruel and unusual
2. One is illegal
These are the same friends who want to stone child molesters (rightfully so) and those who engage in illegal activity (smoking etc)
Can someone please articulate why/how I should differentiate?
Please someone explain to me why one is worse than another. Before anyone accuses me of being a Vick apologist - I HATE Vick and to add a caveat I'm not a dog person. But really shooting a buck between the eyes or electrocuting a dog. Everyone of my friends uses two arguements.
1. Cruel and unusual
2. One is illegal
These are the same friends who want to stone child molesters (rightfully so) and those who engage in illegal activity (smoking etc)
Can someone please articulate why/how I should differentiate?
You will find no support from white middle-class males on this site (99% of the audience) who think Vick is the physical representation of Beelzebub because of dogfighting. Their wildly hypocritical close-mindedness and affection for one domesticated animal over one that they sink their fork and teeth into will blind their argumentation.
You will find no support from white middle-class males on this site (99% of the audience) who think Vick is the physical representation of Beelzebub because of dogfighting. Their wildly hypocritical close-mindedness and affection for one domesticated animal over one that they sink their fork and teeth into will blind their argumentation.
Jelax,First of all I would like to apologize for a comment that I made towards you in another dog thread back in June. I didn't have enough blood in my alcohol stream when I posted that. The next morning when I remembered what I posted,I decided to take a break and didn't log back onto COVERS until earlier this month.
I am both anti-dog fighting and anti-hunting as I could NEVER participate in either and I don't see much difference between the two.However if I came upon a dog fighting ring I'd do what I could to put an end to it,while if I discovered that there was going to be hunting activity at a certain location I would never think of interfering in any way.
i just asked a friend who is an avid hunter this question and he replied,"The difference is that hunters eat what they kill and help keep deer poulations to a somewhat manageable level.If nobody hunted there would be far more car accidents (some of them fatal) due to deer in the roadways and there would also be more deer than food supply which would lead to starvation and disease.On the other hand dog fighters don't eat what they kill and their actions have absolutely zero benefit to the rest of society."
I firmly believe that the majority of hunters do not hunt for food or to perform a civic duty but rather they just enjoy killing a beautiful creature. I especially hate bow season when unless a hunter executes a perfect kill shot he just follows the trail of blood until the animal finally drops.
Jelax,First of all I would like to apologize for a comment that I made towards you in another dog thread back in June. I didn't have enough blood in my alcohol stream when I posted that. The next morning when I remembered what I posted,I decided to take a break and didn't log back onto COVERS until earlier this month.
I am both anti-dog fighting and anti-hunting as I could NEVER participate in either and I don't see much difference between the two.However if I came upon a dog fighting ring I'd do what I could to put an end to it,while if I discovered that there was going to be hunting activity at a certain location I would never think of interfering in any way.
i just asked a friend who is an avid hunter this question and he replied,"The difference is that hunters eat what they kill and help keep deer poulations to a somewhat manageable level.If nobody hunted there would be far more car accidents (some of them fatal) due to deer in the roadways and there would also be more deer than food supply which would lead to starvation and disease.On the other hand dog fighters don't eat what they kill and their actions have absolutely zero benefit to the rest of society."
I firmly believe that the majority of hunters do not hunt for food or to perform a civic duty but rather they just enjoy killing a beautiful creature. I especially hate bow season when unless a hunter executes a perfect kill shot he just follows the trail of blood until the animal finally drops.
Jelax,First of all I would like to apologize for a comment that I made towards you in another dog thread back in June. I didn't have enough blood in my alcohol stream when I posted that. The next morning when I remembered what I posted,I decided to take a break and didn't log back onto COVERS until earlier this month.
I am both anti-dog fighting and anti-hunting as I could NEVER participate in either and I don't see much difference between the two.However if I came upon a dog fighting ring I'd do what I could to put an end to it,while if I discovered that there was going to be hunting activity at a certain location I would never think of interfering in any way.
i just asked a friend who is an avid hunter this question and he replied,"The difference is that hunters eat what they kill and help keep deer poulations to a somewhat manageable level.If nobody hunted there would be far more car accidents (some of them fatal) due to deer in the roadways and there would also be more deer than food supply which would lead to starvation and disease.On the other hand dog fighters don't eat what they kill and their actions have absolutely zero benefit to the rest of society."
I firmly believe that the majority of hunters do not hunt for food or to perform a civic duty but rather they just enjoy killing a beautiful creature. I especially hate bow season when unless a hunter executes a perfect kill shot he just follows the trail of blood until the animal finally drops.
Jelax,First of all I would like to apologize for a comment that I made towards you in another dog thread back in June. I didn't have enough blood in my alcohol stream when I posted that. The next morning when I remembered what I posted,I decided to take a break and didn't log back onto COVERS until earlier this month.
I am both anti-dog fighting and anti-hunting as I could NEVER participate in either and I don't see much difference between the two.However if I came upon a dog fighting ring I'd do what I could to put an end to it,while if I discovered that there was going to be hunting activity at a certain location I would never think of interfering in any way.
i just asked a friend who is an avid hunter this question and he replied,"The difference is that hunters eat what they kill and help keep deer poulations to a somewhat manageable level.If nobody hunted there would be far more car accidents (some of them fatal) due to deer in the roadways and there would also be more deer than food supply which would lead to starvation and disease.On the other hand dog fighters don't eat what they kill and their actions have absolutely zero benefit to the rest of society."
I firmly believe that the majority of hunters do not hunt for food or to perform a civic duty but rather they just enjoy killing a beautiful creature. I especially hate bow season when unless a hunter executes a perfect kill shot he just follows the trail of blood until the animal finally drops.
i do a fair amount of bird and duck hunting down here in the south. used to deer hunt quite a bit but not so much anymore. i am of the opinion that you only kill what you plan on eating. most of my friends are the same way but i do know some who kill strictly for the sake of killing. that, to me, is stupid but i do understand the argument about animal control. the only hunting i don't get is running dogs. not sure where the 'hunt' is in that but to each his own. as for the dog fighting, i would have to give serious consideration to kicking somebody's ass that did that around me. raising any animal to fight another for 'sport' is ludicrous in my opinion. i wouldn't classify myself as an animal lover but i do respect them. again, to each his own.
i do a fair amount of bird and duck hunting down here in the south. used to deer hunt quite a bit but not so much anymore. i am of the opinion that you only kill what you plan on eating. most of my friends are the same way but i do know some who kill strictly for the sake of killing. that, to me, is stupid but i do understand the argument about animal control. the only hunting i don't get is running dogs. not sure where the 'hunt' is in that but to each his own. as for the dog fighting, i would have to give serious consideration to kicking somebody's ass that did that around me. raising any animal to fight another for 'sport' is ludicrous in my opinion. i wouldn't classify myself as an animal lover but i do respect them. again, to each his own.
You will find no support from white middle-class males on this site (99% of the audience) who think Vick is the physical representation of Beelzebub because of dogfighting. Their wildly hypocritical close-mindedness and affection for one domesticated animal over one that they sink their fork and teeth into will blind their argumentation.
Please explain to me how sticking my knife and fork into a piece of beef is the same as torturing a dog.
You will find no support from white middle-class males on this site (99% of the audience) who think Vick is the physical representation of Beelzebub because of dogfighting. Their wildly hypocritical close-mindedness and affection for one domesticated animal over one that they sink their fork and teeth into will blind their argumentation.
Please explain to me how sticking my knife and fork into a piece of beef is the same as torturing a dog.
A fair amount of hunters do so because they have no qualms bout killing an animal and enjoy doing so. Very few do it because they NEED the meat to survive. I do love hunting dogs, they are champs.
A fair amount of hunters do so because they have no qualms bout killing an animal and enjoy doing so. Very few do it because they NEED the meat to survive. I do love hunting dogs, they are champs.
A fair amount of hunters do so because they have no qualms bout killing an animal and enjoy doing so. Very few do it because they NEED the meat to survive. I do love hunting dogs, they are champs.
A fair amount of hunters do so because they have no qualms bout killing an animal and enjoy doing so. Very few do it because they NEED the meat to survive. I do love hunting dogs, they are champs.
Good to see the sites resident racist douchebag couldnt go half a post without injecting race into the issue
Is this a race issue in any way? Would you not say it's similar to the crack vs cocaine issue? I HATE Farve too but I doubt he and his friends go hunting to help control certain population of animals and also when he leaves dead animals in a teammates locker it's a funny story and everybody celebrates him.
Good to see the sites resident racist douchebag couldnt go half a post without injecting race into the issue
Is this a race issue in any way? Would you not say it's similar to the crack vs cocaine issue? I HATE Farve too but I doubt he and his friends go hunting to help control certain population of animals and also when he leaves dead animals in a teammates locker it's a funny story and everybody celebrates him.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
You really need to come up with a better argument.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
You really need to come up with a better argument.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
You're just a trigger happy redneck pedophile who likes to tote a shot gun around and shoot anything that moves. On top of that you like to fuck your own sister and cousins.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
You're just a trigger happy redneck pedophile who likes to tote a shot gun around and shoot anything that moves. On top of that you like to fuck your own sister and cousins.
You really need to come up with a better argument.
A better argument than millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly?What’s your argument? “It’s mean to animals”?
You really need to come up with a better argument.
A better argument than millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly?What’s your argument? “It’s mean to animals”?
You're just a trigger happy redneck pedophile who likes to tote a shot gun around and shoot anything that moves. On top of that you like to fuck your own sister and cousins.
You're just a trigger happy redneck pedophile who likes to tote a shot gun around and shoot anything that moves. On top of that you like to fuck your own sister and cousins.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
The ignorance of anti-hunters is hilarious.They seem completely oblivious to the fact that if there was no hunting then millions of animals would starve to death and human fatalities would rise significantly.But hey, at least they wouldn’t have to worry about being shot while they were dying a slow and agonizing death.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.