Western looking good here I don't think Central can keep up. This is Jeff Brohm's first year as a head coach first year in a bowl and I believe he will have his team ready. The weather in Nassau today calls for 80 degrees with a 75 degree dew point. I believe the humidity will be tough on a MAC defense that will not have the depth to pass rush and cover for 4 quarters. I think Central will try to rush on a weak Hilltopper defense, limit Western's possessions and keep this one close until the 4th quarter. The key to that will be whether they fall behind early. I believe that they will. I believe this is the key to the over as well. It's either a shootout with the Chips trying to keep up or possibly Central can stifle the Toppers offense enough to control the game with their running attack. I'll bank on Jeff Brohm and the high flying Hilltopper offense! Hilltoppers -3.5 Over 68 GLTA! By the way what exactly is a fucktard?
Western looking good here I don't think Central can keep up. This is Jeff Brohm's first year as a head coach first year in a bowl and I believe he will have his team ready. The weather in Nassau today calls for 80 degrees with a 75 degree dew point. I believe the humidity will be tough on a MAC defense that will not have the depth to pass rush and cover for 4 quarters. I think Central will try to rush on a weak Hilltopper defense, limit Western's possessions and keep this one close until the 4th quarter. The key to that will be whether they fall behind early. I believe that they will. I believe this is the key to the over as well. It's either a shootout with the Chips trying to keep up or possibly Central can stifle the Toppers offense enough to control the game with their running attack. I'll bank on Jeff Brohm and the high flying Hilltopper offense! Hilltoppers -3.5 Over 68 GLTA! By the way what exactly is a fucktard?
No, they are called 'team experts' because they have the best results, measured in units, when betting on a certain team for the current season in a covers contest. Out of thousands of people in the contest, the top 10 are singled out as team experts.. it's far from covers randomly selecting experts and calling them that. Team experts after 12 games are more meaningful than experts after 3 games. However, like anything else in sports betting, there are millions of factors, this is just one and shouldn't be used solely to select a side. Do your own handicapping, don't rely on others!
Right. You just said the same thing I said. Just in a different way. Covers has stated them as experts for whatever reason. Because they did this for this amount of time, or that or that amount of time, or they made this many right decisions during this time of evaluation or during that time of evaluation. For WHATEVER reason, covers has stated them as experts. It in NO WAY means they are actually experts. Any RANDOM person, can gain that title, if they pass whatever evaluation covers uses to decide they are "experts". Again, it in NO WAY, means they are actually experts.
No, they are called 'team experts' because they have the best results, measured in units, when betting on a certain team for the current season in a covers contest. Out of thousands of people in the contest, the top 10 are singled out as team experts.. it's far from covers randomly selecting experts and calling them that. Team experts after 12 games are more meaningful than experts after 3 games. However, like anything else in sports betting, there are millions of factors, this is just one and shouldn't be used solely to select a side. Do your own handicapping, don't rely on others!
Right. You just said the same thing I said. Just in a different way. Covers has stated them as experts for whatever reason. Because they did this for this amount of time, or that or that amount of time, or they made this many right decisions during this time of evaluation or during that time of evaluation. For WHATEVER reason, covers has stated them as experts. It in NO WAY means they are actually experts. Any RANDOM person, can gain that title, if they pass whatever evaluation covers uses to decide they are "experts". Again, it in NO WAY, means they are actually experts.
End of the first quarter so far so good. I think it only gets worse for the Chips defense in this humidity and the no huddle offense for the Toppers. GLTA!
End of the first quarter so far so good. I think it only gets worse for the Chips defense in this humidity and the no huddle offense for the Toppers. GLTA!
I'm not one to go all conspiracy with sports and say they're rigged but was this mf rigged or what?? 42 - 14 at half, then outscored 34 - 7 in the 2nd half, THEN they pull the ol circus lateral play for a TD with 1 tick left on the clock?? That garbage woulda never happened if I had +3.5
I'm not one to go all conspiracy with sports and say they're rigged but was this mf rigged or what?? 42 - 14 at half, then outscored 34 - 7 in the 2nd half, THEN they pull the ol circus lateral play for a TD with 1 tick left on the clock?? That garbage woulda never happened if I had +3.5
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.