I am providing no value-added to the forum thus far. Last Saturday was nothing less than horrible (6-12, .333), and the season record offers no better (13-21, .382). Alas, no shortage of optimism as I rotate the handle to generate these: 1) OhioState(-30)/WestKentucky 2) Michigan(-40.5)/BowlingGreen 3) Oregon(-38)/Hawaii 4) Iowa(-28)/WesternMichigan 5) EasternMichigan( -7)/Mass 6) NotreDame(-34.5)/CentralMich 7) TexasA&M(-36.5)/LA-Monroe 8) Georgia(-27.5)/SouthCarolina 9) Maryland(-14.5)/Virginia 10) Tulane(-12.5)/SoMississippi 11) KansasState(-5)/Missouri 12) MississippiSt(+10)/LSU 13) BostonCollege(+25.5)/FloridaSt 14) UNLV(+4)/Vanderbilt 15) Florida(+6.5)/Tennessee 16) Houston(+7.5)/TCU 17) MichiganState(+ 17)/Washington 18) OhioUniv(+2.5)/IowaState 19) ArizonaState(+3)/FresnoState
There has been some rank-value in my 2023 top five, but short of profitable and only to say they are performing better than the rest (5-5, .500). A long season with lots of volume looms. And I’ll be here Rain or Shine -- until the very end. Hopefully not the literature-affirming………bitter end.
No shortage of opportunity for us this week with 54 on the board. Good luck, TheKingfish
I am providing no value-added to the forum thus far. Last Saturday was nothing less than horrible (6-12, .333), and the season record offers no better (13-21, .382). Alas, no shortage of optimism as I rotate the handle to generate these: 1) OhioState(-30)/WestKentucky 2) Michigan(-40.5)/BowlingGreen 3) Oregon(-38)/Hawaii 4) Iowa(-28)/WesternMichigan 5) EasternMichigan( -7)/Mass 6) NotreDame(-34.5)/CentralMich 7) TexasA&M(-36.5)/LA-Monroe 8) Georgia(-27.5)/SouthCarolina 9) Maryland(-14.5)/Virginia 10) Tulane(-12.5)/SoMississippi 11) KansasState(-5)/Missouri 12) MississippiSt(+10)/LSU 13) BostonCollege(+25.5)/FloridaSt 14) UNLV(+4)/Vanderbilt 15) Florida(+6.5)/Tennessee 16) Houston(+7.5)/TCU 17) MichiganState(+ 17)/Washington 18) OhioUniv(+2.5)/IowaState 19) ArizonaState(+3)/FresnoState
There has been some rank-value in my 2023 top five, but short of profitable and only to say they are performing better than the rest (5-5, .500). A long season with lots of volume looms. And I’ll be here Rain or Shine -- until the very end. Hopefully not the literature-affirming………bitter end.
No shortage of opportunity for us this week with 54 on the board. Good luck, TheKingfish
Thank you for posting. I don’t get many reply posts -- especially when I’m not actively producing a stream of winners. I offer two thoughts:
First, we are all essentially in competition with one another. The Man, acting as broker, takes his rake based on conventional juice. Conversely you and I are in the trenches, tugging at the flow-dollars, looking to corral our piece. So, the presence of incompetent bettors (like myself, purported) are a distinct advantage -- feeding cappers with talent.
Second, consider the technical aspect of my method. I evaluate every game on the board. My X amount of dollars risked is generally the same amount as a fundamental capper who lands on 3 or 4 teams. Difference is, my X dollars are spread over a large group; diversified if you will. In the end, total juice adds to same for each case. And capper total-confidence is same for teams wagered. Apples & apples.
I had a bad year in 2022. Prior, I had a good forum-documented year in 2021 (103-78-4, .569); my top two selections went .625 (15-9-2). We all operate in a challenging environment, and the handicapping combo of success & volume is no small thing. In fact, it can be value-added in the sense of community. Example: a capper can forge his/her personal selections, then see if they coincide with a reasonably successful (free) public source. No harm in that…..plus I received no challenges to my volume in 2021.
With that I take my leave on this discussion, and allow the wisdom of this forum to wash over us. For my part, I respect every capper’s method. And ask a modicum of respect for mine…… Good luck, TheKingfish
Thank you for posting. I don’t get many reply posts -- especially when I’m not actively producing a stream of winners. I offer two thoughts:
First, we are all essentially in competition with one another. The Man, acting as broker, takes his rake based on conventional juice. Conversely you and I are in the trenches, tugging at the flow-dollars, looking to corral our piece. So, the presence of incompetent bettors (like myself, purported) are a distinct advantage -- feeding cappers with talent.
Second, consider the technical aspect of my method. I evaluate every game on the board. My X amount of dollars risked is generally the same amount as a fundamental capper who lands on 3 or 4 teams. Difference is, my X dollars are spread over a large group; diversified if you will. In the end, total juice adds to same for each case. And capper total-confidence is same for teams wagered. Apples & apples.
I had a bad year in 2022. Prior, I had a good forum-documented year in 2021 (103-78-4, .569); my top two selections went .625 (15-9-2). We all operate in a challenging environment, and the handicapping combo of success & volume is no small thing. In fact, it can be value-added in the sense of community. Example: a capper can forge his/her personal selections, then see if they coincide with a reasonably successful (free) public source. No harm in that…..plus I received no challenges to my volume in 2021.
With that I take my leave on this discussion, and allow the wisdom of this forum to wash over us. For my part, I respect every capper’s method. And ask a modicum of respect for mine…… Good luck, TheKingfish
I doubt you've read much of KF's posts over the years. His record speaks for itself. He's had bad weeks/seasons like everyone else, but the overall record is as good as anyone else here.
I doubt you've read much of KF's posts over the years. His record speaks for itself. He's had bad weeks/seasons like everyone else, but the overall record is as good as anyone else here.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.