I understand your hesitancy in laying almost 3 TDs of road chalk, but read my notes on the Kentucky QB situation in Post #34. I think Kentucky has almost no shot to cover this today.
I understand your hesitancy in laying almost 3 TDs of road chalk, but read my notes on the Kentucky QB situation in Post #34. I think Kentucky has almost no shot to cover this today.
I was curious to the depth at UGA. UGA only has 75 scholly players and 8 of those were awarded to walk-ons. This is the first year in a while that UT actually has some depth. (worried about the secondary however...and lack of pass rush = bad combonation)
Now of course UGA pulled away from Mizzou in what was a close game. And UF pulled away from UT in a close game, but if you watch that game UT flat out quit after the demoralizing plays by UF in the third. The UT staff and players were not prepared for the zone read of UF, then Bray started hanging his head and it was 3 and out the rest of the game. (Akron classic let down after high hopes were dashed in the UF game and look ahead to UGA)
UT does match up better with UGA, but I believe the depth is not an advantage to UGA and it could be a 4Q game. Like someone earlier posted though, I do not know if I can trust the Vols though.
What are your thoughts on Sunseri? I expected that to be an upgrade over Wilcox and TN does have the personnel for a 3-4 transition, but against UF defensive players were confused on several occasions and definitely looked unprepared at times.
Thanks for all your work and input this year.
Your point on depth is well taken, but when I speak of depth I typically view it as the top 50 players, and view depth at key positions like defensive line.
The person I don't trust on Tennessee is Tyler Bray. I think he is very immature.
It always takes time to adjust from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Look at the first year of every team that's done it . . . Alabama, Georgia, Florida. It takes time for guys to learn their assignments which allows them to play fast instead of thinking too much.
I was curious to the depth at UGA. UGA only has 75 scholly players and 8 of those were awarded to walk-ons. This is the first year in a while that UT actually has some depth. (worried about the secondary however...and lack of pass rush = bad combonation)
Now of course UGA pulled away from Mizzou in what was a close game. And UF pulled away from UT in a close game, but if you watch that game UT flat out quit after the demoralizing plays by UF in the third. The UT staff and players were not prepared for the zone read of UF, then Bray started hanging his head and it was 3 and out the rest of the game. (Akron classic let down after high hopes were dashed in the UF game and look ahead to UGA)
UT does match up better with UGA, but I believe the depth is not an advantage to UGA and it could be a 4Q game. Like someone earlier posted though, I do not know if I can trust the Vols though.
What are your thoughts on Sunseri? I expected that to be an upgrade over Wilcox and TN does have the personnel for a 3-4 transition, but against UF defensive players were confused on several occasions and definitely looked unprepared at times.
Thanks for all your work and input this year.
Your point on depth is well taken, but when I speak of depth I typically view it as the top 50 players, and view depth at key positions like defensive line.
The person I don't trust on Tennessee is Tyler Bray. I think he is very immature.
It always takes time to adjust from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Look at the first year of every team that's done it . . . Alabama, Georgia, Florida. It takes time for guys to learn their assignments which allows them to play fast instead of thinking too much.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.