JWheels
1. Played at Alabama
2. Played at Miss State
3. Was on an Alabama team that lost to UL Monroe
4. Admitted you was a cheerleader in high school.
Shit this just keeps getting better and better...tell us some more...
JWheels
1. Played at Alabama
2. Played at Miss State
3. Was on an Alabama team that lost to UL Monroe
4. Admitted you was a cheerleader in high school.
Shit this just keeps getting better and better...tell us some more...
Stop posting, seriously you are the worst poster I have ever encountered on the internet. No one pays attention to anything you say because it's useless biased rabble. You are actually mentally challenged
People must like what i say, they keep checking back to see our pissing match. Oh' yea the thread i made about "Michigan" i guess i viewed it almost 12,000 times.
Stop posting, seriously you are the worst poster I have ever encountered on the internet. No one pays attention to anything you say because it's useless biased rabble. You are actually mentally challenged
People must like what i say, they keep checking back to see our pissing match. Oh' yea the thread i made about "Michigan" i guess i viewed it almost 12,000 times.
Only in Alabama would the public learn that one Heisman Trophy winner (Mark Ingram) is headed to the NFL thanks to a quote from a recruit who may or may not have had an impermissible conversation with Nick Saban.
Only in Alabama would a school make plans for another Heisman winner (Cam Newton) to turn into a statue before the NCAA closes its look into his recruitment.
Accusations are par for the course in Alabama, where both schools and fans intently watch each other. History suggests it's hit or miss if any of the latest accusations will actually carry substance enough to land a blow deep enough to impose NCAA penalties.
But it would be foolish to ignore how frequently these programs get in trouble. NCAA President Mark Emmert couldn't be blamed if his idea to beef up enforcement includes setting up a satellite office in Alabama.
Since the NCAA began tracking major infractions cases in 1953, Auburn athletics has been hit seven times. That's tied for third among current Football Bowl Subdivision schools, behind only SMU and Arizona State. Alabama is tied for 18th with five major infractions, and leads the FBS since 1995 with four.
During the past 20 years, Alabama and Auburn have never gone more than five years without one getting hit with major violations in some sport. (Alabama leads 4-3, in case you're scoring at home.)
The schools stand at two years and counting without a major violation. They're right on track toward future trouble given the toxic environment.
Only in Alabama would the public learn that one Heisman Trophy winner (Mark Ingram) is headed to the NFL thanks to a quote from a recruit who may or may not have had an impermissible conversation with Nick Saban.
Only in Alabama would a school make plans for another Heisman winner (Cam Newton) to turn into a statue before the NCAA closes its look into his recruitment.
Accusations are par for the course in Alabama, where both schools and fans intently watch each other. History suggests it's hit or miss if any of the latest accusations will actually carry substance enough to land a blow deep enough to impose NCAA penalties.
But it would be foolish to ignore how frequently these programs get in trouble. NCAA President Mark Emmert couldn't be blamed if his idea to beef up enforcement includes setting up a satellite office in Alabama.
Since the NCAA began tracking major infractions cases in 1953, Auburn athletics has been hit seven times. That's tied for third among current Football Bowl Subdivision schools, behind only SMU and Arizona State. Alabama is tied for 18th with five major infractions, and leads the FBS since 1995 with four.
During the past 20 years, Alabama and Auburn have never gone more than five years without one getting hit with major violations in some sport. (Alabama leads 4-3, in case you're scoring at home.)
The schools stand at two years and counting without a major violation. They're right on track toward future trouble given the toxic environment.
@SportsbyBrooks is at it again – Playing inspector Gadget with Alabama Crimson Tide players being involved in activities that would potentially violate NCAA rules. Following up on a previous post regarding RB Trent Richardson’s alleged involvement with disassociated Alabama booster Tom Albetar, Richardson could find himself in some additional trouble if NCAA authorities decide to investigate.
Yesterday, SportsbyBrooks reported:
‘Chilton County, Alabama, public court records showed Trent Richardson was driving a “GMC YUKON” with a “Vehicle year” of 2011 – and was listed as the owner of the SUV – when he was ticketed for speeding by an Alabama Highway Patrol Officer on August 28, 2011.’
Apparently, after SbB looked into court documents, he discovered Trent Richardson owned ‘two new vehicles valued over $60,000 (base stickers) in span of 10 months.’
@SportsbyBrooks is at it again – Playing inspector Gadget with Alabama Crimson Tide players being involved in activities that would potentially violate NCAA rules. Following up on a previous post regarding RB Trent Richardson’s alleged involvement with disassociated Alabama booster Tom Albetar, Richardson could find himself in some additional trouble if NCAA authorities decide to investigate.
Yesterday, SportsbyBrooks reported:
‘Chilton County, Alabama, public court records showed Trent Richardson was driving a “GMC YUKON” with a “Vehicle year” of 2011 – and was listed as the owner of the SUV – when he was ticketed for speeding by an Alabama Highway Patrol Officer on August 28, 2011.’
Apparently, after SbB looked into court documents, he discovered Trent Richardson owned ‘two new vehicles valued over $60,000 (base stickers) in span of 10 months.’
Are Alabamafas ot o their MIND???
If you thought Harvey Updyke was stuck on stupid, we give you Brian Downing. The only difference: one idiot bragged about breaking the law in the name of Roll Damn Tide, and the other did it while his friends watched—and recorded—the sad event.
It’s so utterly disgusting and degrading, it’s not worth linking to the viral video. But know this: The entire four minutes and 48 seconds of infamy—and 30 seconds of one man exposing his genitalia and placing it on the face of another man—is rock bottom for the lunatic fringe of college football fans.
Are Alabamafas ot o their MIND???
If you thought Harvey Updyke was stuck on stupid, we give you Brian Downing. The only difference: one idiot bragged about breaking the law in the name of Roll Damn Tide, and the other did it while his friends watched—and recorded—the sad event.
It’s so utterly disgusting and degrading, it’s not worth linking to the viral video. But know this: The entire four minutes and 48 seconds of infamy—and 30 seconds of one man exposing his genitalia and placing it on the face of another man—is rock bottom for the lunatic fringe of college football fans.
11. The relevant portions of the charge read as follows:
Counts 24 through 32 charge a wire fraud scheme to deceive state insurance regulators involving reinsurance. The superseding indictment alleges that in late 1992 or early 1993 the defendant devised a scheme to deceive state regulators and others regarding the true and complete reinsurance arrangements involving Summit National Life Insurance Company, its subsidiary Fidelity General Life Insurance Company, and the Alabama Reassurance Company in order to inflate their financial statements.
Sources tell Legal Schnauzer that, during the Stewart case, the U.S. Department of Justice was prepared to launch a heightened investigation of Alabama Reassurance. That determination, our sources say, came from Caryl Privett, then U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama. By the time the Stewart case was over, however, Privett had stepped down and been replaced as U.S. attorney by Doug Jones--and the investigation into Alabama Re was called off.
Jones is a University of Alabama graduate, and our sources say he has done legal work for Paul W. Bryant Jr. Jones now is with the Birmingham firm of Haskell Slaughter.
11. The relevant portions of the charge read as follows:
Counts 24 through 32 charge a wire fraud scheme to deceive state insurance regulators involving reinsurance. The superseding indictment alleges that in late 1992 or early 1993 the defendant devised a scheme to deceive state regulators and others regarding the true and complete reinsurance arrangements involving Summit National Life Insurance Company, its subsidiary Fidelity General Life Insurance Company, and the Alabama Reassurance Company in order to inflate their financial statements.
Sources tell Legal Schnauzer that, during the Stewart case, the U.S. Department of Justice was prepared to launch a heightened investigation of Alabama Reassurance. That determination, our sources say, came from Caryl Privett, then U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama. By the time the Stewart case was over, however, Privett had stepped down and been replaced as U.S. attorney by Doug Jones--and the investigation into Alabama Re was called off.
Jones is a University of Alabama graduate, and our sources say he has done legal work for Paul W. Bryant Jr. Jones now is with the Birmingham firm of Haskell Slaughter.
Lucan gave me new life!!!
There's nothing wrong with these men selling their autographs then. But is there something wrong with any college kid appearing in a television commercial with someone named Louie Linguini? I think so. Although, let's be fair, this Terrence Cody block sequence is Academy Award winning. Perhaps the greatest single athlete acting performance since Cody's own shirtless forty yard dash. You must watch this video here.
But given the current environment where schools like Ohio State can lose their coach because of tattoo hook-ups, should a Tuscaloosa establishment really be advertising its store with autographed jerseys of Julio Jones, Mark Ingram, and Trent Richardson during the 2010 season? (The date stamp on the T-Town Menswear Facebook album, which you can view for the moment right here -- before it is inevitably pulled early this morning -- is November 1,2010 but the date on the camera is October 19, 2010). Julio Jones and Mark Ingram have since gone pro, although they weren't pros at the time that their autographed helmets and jerseys were inside the store windows. But two of the jerseys in the window Nico Johnson, a rising junior, and Trent Richardson, one of the top Heisman candidates in the country, are back for 2011.
And no matter what Trent Richardson surely shouldn't be posing for photos as he signs helmets in the store.
Lucan gave me new life!!!
There's nothing wrong with these men selling their autographs then. But is there something wrong with any college kid appearing in a television commercial with someone named Louie Linguini? I think so. Although, let's be fair, this Terrence Cody block sequence is Academy Award winning. Perhaps the greatest single athlete acting performance since Cody's own shirtless forty yard dash. You must watch this video here.
But given the current environment where schools like Ohio State can lose their coach because of tattoo hook-ups, should a Tuscaloosa establishment really be advertising its store with autographed jerseys of Julio Jones, Mark Ingram, and Trent Richardson during the 2010 season? (The date stamp on the T-Town Menswear Facebook album, which you can view for the moment right here -- before it is inevitably pulled early this morning -- is November 1,2010 but the date on the camera is October 19, 2010). Julio Jones and Mark Ingram have since gone pro, although they weren't pros at the time that their autographed helmets and jerseys were inside the store windows. But two of the jerseys in the window Nico Johnson, a rising junior, and Trent Richardson, one of the top Heisman candidates in the country, are back for 2011.
And no matter what Trent Richardson surely shouldn't be posing for photos as he signs helmets in the store.
Answer to my question? = YES
The relevant NCAA bylaw that governs this situation is found here:
"12.5.2.1 Advertisements and Promotions After Becoming a Student-Athlete. After becoming a student-athlete, an individual shall not be eligible for participation in intercollegiate athletics if the individual: (a) Accepts any remuneration for or permits the use of his or her name or picture to advertise, recommend or promote directly the sale or use of a commercial product or service of any kind."
Answer to my question? = YES
The relevant NCAA bylaw that governs this situation is found here:
"12.5.2.1 Advertisements and Promotions After Becoming a Student-Athlete. After becoming a student-athlete, an individual shall not be eligible for participation in intercollegiate athletics if the individual: (a) Accepts any remuneration for or permits the use of his or her name or picture to advertise, recommend or promote directly the sale or use of a commercial product or service of any kind."
Analysis of Cam Newton and Auburn penalties
Infractions: Pay for Play paid from boosters to the players uncle in the amount of $350,000.
Punishment: 20 scholarships, 2 year bowl ban, stripped of N.C.
Alabama and Julio Jones, Trent Rchardson, and Mark Ingram
Infractions: Pay for play from boosters to the players close relatives in the amount of $500,000 per player.
Punishment: Currently on probation should be Death Penalty, but will be 20 scholarships, 2 year bowl ban, stripped of N.C.s
Analysis of Cam Newton and Auburn penalties
Infractions: Pay for Play paid from boosters to the players uncle in the amount of $350,000.
Punishment: 20 scholarships, 2 year bowl ban, stripped of N.C.
Alabama and Julio Jones, Trent Rchardson, and Mark Ingram
Infractions: Pay for play from boosters to the players close relatives in the amount of $500,000 per player.
Punishment: Currently on probation should be Death Penalty, but will be 20 scholarships, 2 year bowl ban, stripped of N.C.s
I gave you life again
You just like typeing to yourself, by the way i have not read one post in this thread, i knew you was full of shit with the thread title.
I gave you life again
You just like typeing to yourself, by the way i have not read one post in this thread, i knew you was full of shit with the thread title.
Alabama is the best in the world!!!
As the story surrounding T-Town Menswear continues to grow -- USA Today had it on the front page of today's newspaper -- and the Birmingham News sent two reporters to the store yesterday, including lead columnist Kevin Scarbinsky who noted what appears to be Trent Richardson's BCS game jersey on the wall, Alabama continues to remain silent. It has now been four days since OKTC requested comment on what Tom Albetar's official status with the program is. The longer this silence drags on the more likely it seems that the university has determined Albetar, a man who received multiple sideline passes, is a booster, raising the stakes that much higher in this growing story. If Albetar is a booster who sold autographed items from current players, how can Alabama claim that it didn't know and shouldn't haven known about the activities?
Especially when OKTC is about to blow this story up even more, why is Trent Richardson out for a hibachi dinner with Tom Albetar, the man Alabama has confirmed has been selling autographed Alabama gear featuring Richardson? What's more, who do you think picked up the check the store owner or the student-athlete?
Does Alabama know about this photo? Can they prove that Richardson paid for his part of the meal? And if Richardson did pay for this meal in January of 2010, isn't it just as damning? Since it would mean by the time he showed up in Albetar's store to sign autographs in September of 2010, he knew Albetar well enough to know that the jerseys were being sold.
Basically, if you're willing to hang out in his shop on many, many days, sign many autographs while being photographed doing so, and go out to dinner with the owner either at his expense or yours, how can Alabama reasonably claim that Richardson didn't know his jerseys and other apparel were being sold? Put simply, Alabama can't.
Furthermore, in light of Kevin Scarbinsky's report do we really believe that Richardson gave up his BCS title game jersey to a stranger and allowed him to hang it on the wall while receiving absolutely nothing in return?
Doesn't that boggle the mind too?
Other aspects of this story don't make sense either. Why, for instance, did Alabama's cease and desist letter from December 22 not specify a particular location? And why did that letter not reference, in particular, the jerseys in the windows of T-Town's Menswear? By allowing those jerseys to remain in the windows for months, there is a strong argument that the players and the unversity countenanced their display, meaning the players would need to be ruled ineligible.
In its initial response to OKTC Alabama made it seem the cease and desist letter had been sent specifically to the store, but that's not the case. What's more, is it a coincidence that the date on the letter is the same day that news broke about the Ohio State tattoo parlor? Did Alabama print off a bunch of cease and desist letters for local businesses in a quick attempt to cover its ***?
Alabama is the best in the world!!!
As the story surrounding T-Town Menswear continues to grow -- USA Today had it on the front page of today's newspaper -- and the Birmingham News sent two reporters to the store yesterday, including lead columnist Kevin Scarbinsky who noted what appears to be Trent Richardson's BCS game jersey on the wall, Alabama continues to remain silent. It has now been four days since OKTC requested comment on what Tom Albetar's official status with the program is. The longer this silence drags on the more likely it seems that the university has determined Albetar, a man who received multiple sideline passes, is a booster, raising the stakes that much higher in this growing story. If Albetar is a booster who sold autographed items from current players, how can Alabama claim that it didn't know and shouldn't haven known about the activities?
Especially when OKTC is about to blow this story up even more, why is Trent Richardson out for a hibachi dinner with Tom Albetar, the man Alabama has confirmed has been selling autographed Alabama gear featuring Richardson? What's more, who do you think picked up the check the store owner or the student-athlete?
Does Alabama know about this photo? Can they prove that Richardson paid for his part of the meal? And if Richardson did pay for this meal in January of 2010, isn't it just as damning? Since it would mean by the time he showed up in Albetar's store to sign autographs in September of 2010, he knew Albetar well enough to know that the jerseys were being sold.
Basically, if you're willing to hang out in his shop on many, many days, sign many autographs while being photographed doing so, and go out to dinner with the owner either at his expense or yours, how can Alabama reasonably claim that Richardson didn't know his jerseys and other apparel were being sold? Put simply, Alabama can't.
Furthermore, in light of Kevin Scarbinsky's report do we really believe that Richardson gave up his BCS title game jersey to a stranger and allowed him to hang it on the wall while receiving absolutely nothing in return?
Doesn't that boggle the mind too?
Other aspects of this story don't make sense either. Why, for instance, did Alabama's cease and desist letter from December 22 not specify a particular location? And why did that letter not reference, in particular, the jerseys in the windows of T-Town's Menswear? By allowing those jerseys to remain in the windows for months, there is a strong argument that the players and the unversity countenanced their display, meaning the players would need to be ruled ineligible.
In its initial response to OKTC Alabama made it seem the cease and desist letter had been sent specifically to the store, but that's not the case. What's more, is it a coincidence that the date on the letter is the same day that news broke about the Ohio State tattoo parlor? Did Alabama print off a bunch of cease and desist letters for local businesses in a quick attempt to cover its ***?
Lucan
Especially when we now have evidence that Richardson knew Albetar well enough to go to dinner with him and give him his BCS title game jersey for display?
This story is only deepening, and the silence from both Alabama and Albetar speaks volumes.
What's more if you think this site has been covering this story aggressively, wait until the national media feeding frenzy commences.
In case you're just checking in, here is the Suitgate story -- as broken by OKTC -- in chronological order:
Our initial report on the player jerseys in the window at T-Town Menswear.
Trent Richardson signing jerseys inside the store.
Owner of T-Town Menswear had sideline passes for Bama games, may be a booster.
Alabama acknowledges that current player autographs were being sold by T-Town Menswear owner.
Julio Jones: Man of Many Suits
Lucan
Especially when we now have evidence that Richardson knew Albetar well enough to go to dinner with him and give him his BCS title game jersey for display?
This story is only deepening, and the silence from both Alabama and Albetar speaks volumes.
What's more if you think this site has been covering this story aggressively, wait until the national media feeding frenzy commences.
In case you're just checking in, here is the Suitgate story -- as broken by OKTC -- in chronological order:
Our initial report on the player jerseys in the window at T-Town Menswear.
Trent Richardson signing jerseys inside the store.
Owner of T-Town Menswear had sideline passes for Bama games, may be a booster.
Alabama acknowledges that current player autographs were being sold by T-Town Menswear owner.
Julio Jones: Man of Many Suits
Alabama does S.W.A.T.S and keeps a secret for 2 years....Ray (one person) does it once and the media is on it like this (ESPN bias towards SEC rears its head again!!!
The same Sports Illustrated story that alleged Lewis obtained a banned deer-antler spray also contained a report that several Alabama football players received S.W.A.T.S. products prior to the Crimson Tide's January 2012 win over LSU in the BCS national title game.
S.W.A.T.S. representative Christopher Key showed Sports Illustrated video of him passing out "chips" to Alabama players two days before the BCS game. The "chips" are stickers that athletes place on their wrists and heart for an alleged energy boost. Crimson Tide linebacker Alex Watkins later confirmed the effectiveness of the company's chips, "negatively charged" water and deer-antler pills in a YouTube video, SI reported.
The players were given the products for free, though Key told them he'd claim they purchased the goods from him, according to the report.
Read more: https://www.wcvb.com/news/sports/Report-Alabama-players-received-banned-substances-before-2012-title-game/-/9848968/18330996/-/bms2bjz/-/index.html#ixzz2JTl8ls1N
They can bring this up before the super bowl ..but not NCAAF!!! Whats ESPNs $$$ take in the NFL???
Alabama does S.W.A.T.S and keeps a secret for 2 years....Ray (one person) does it once and the media is on it like this (ESPN bias towards SEC rears its head again!!!
The same Sports Illustrated story that alleged Lewis obtained a banned deer-antler spray also contained a report that several Alabama football players received S.W.A.T.S. products prior to the Crimson Tide's January 2012 win over LSU in the BCS national title game.
S.W.A.T.S. representative Christopher Key showed Sports Illustrated video of him passing out "chips" to Alabama players two days before the BCS game. The "chips" are stickers that athletes place on their wrists and heart for an alleged energy boost. Crimson Tide linebacker Alex Watkins later confirmed the effectiveness of the company's chips, "negatively charged" water and deer-antler pills in a YouTube video, SI reported.
The players were given the products for free, though Key told them he'd claim they purchased the goods from him, according to the report.
Read more: https://www.wcvb.com/news/sports/Report-Alabama-players-received-banned-substances-before-2012-title-game/-/9848968/18330996/-/bms2bjz/-/index.html#ixzz2JTl8ls1N
They can bring this up before the super bowl ..but not NCAAF!!! Whats ESPNs $$$ take in the NFL???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.