Its not illegal for me to admit someone ask me to do something illegal!! Paying football players is not illegal!! Stating facts about players gettting paid is not ILLEGAL!! What makes you think that AU And Alabama didnt have a guy who "took care" of the PAYING THE PLAYERS IE A "BAGMAN EXISTS ON ALL SEC CAMPUSES!!
Its not illegal for me to admit someone ask me to do something illegal!! Paying football players is not illegal!! Stating facts about players gettting paid is not ILLEGAL!! What makes you think that AU And Alabama didnt have a guy who "took care" of the PAYING THE PLAYERS IE A "BAGMAN EXISTS ON ALL SEC CAMPUSES!!
It has not yet been demonstrated that there is a need for "Internet law." Instead, our legal institutions should endeavor to understand the Internet and its applications thoroughly enough to enable those institutions to apply existing legal principles and precedents to the novel fact situations presented by the Internet.
Im not affiliated with the NCAAF; and anything said on posts and forums is Hearsay, if an agent or coach or nfl player or coach said such things, Defamation suit would be quick in coming!!
It has not yet been demonstrated that there is a need for "Internet law." Instead, our legal institutions should endeavor to understand the Internet and its applications thoroughly enough to enable those institutions to apply existing legal principles and precedents to the novel fact situations presented by the Internet.
Im not affiliated with the NCAAF; and anything said on posts and forums is Hearsay, if an agent or coach or nfl player or coach said such things, Defamation suit would be quick in coming!!
Call them up bamapiks
Because of the CDA, you can’t go after the site where the defamatory comments are posted, you must go after the person who posted them (although obviously they are sometimes one in the same).
Sometimes a simple cease and desist letter is enough make the person who posted the comments do the right thing, and in other instances it will be necessary to pursue legal action. If your business did a bad job and someone posted a truthful comment about it, we will not take your case. We encourage and support the marketplace of ideas, and adhere to the standards of the California Defamation Lawyers Association, which state that no attorney should ever use a defamation action as leverage to remove legitimate comments.
However, if false statements have been posted about you or your business, then we will aggressively pursue that person in order to restore your reputation and minimize the damages being done, whether that requires a simple cease and desist letter or escalation to legal action. We are one of the few law firms (indeed the only one of which we are aware) which routinely obtains not only judgments for past defamation, but injunctive relief which prevents defamation in the future.
We all support free speech, but false statements on the Internet do nothing to promote the “marketplace of ideas” envisioned by the drafters of the Constitution. To the contrary, as more and more false information is posted on the Internet, the attitude becomes that all information found there must be viewed with distrust, so it becomes more difficult to disseminate true and helpful information. It is for this reason that all should promote free speech while at the same time discouraging false, defamatory speech.
Every situation is unique, and requires an appropriate and rapid response. Call today at (714) 954-0700 for a free telephone consultation to discuss your situation. We offer effective and economical solutions to your Internet defamation problems.
Call them up bamapiks
Because of the CDA, you can’t go after the site where the defamatory comments are posted, you must go after the person who posted them (although obviously they are sometimes one in the same).
Sometimes a simple cease and desist letter is enough make the person who posted the comments do the right thing, and in other instances it will be necessary to pursue legal action. If your business did a bad job and someone posted a truthful comment about it, we will not take your case. We encourage and support the marketplace of ideas, and adhere to the standards of the California Defamation Lawyers Association, which state that no attorney should ever use a defamation action as leverage to remove legitimate comments.
However, if false statements have been posted about you or your business, then we will aggressively pursue that person in order to restore your reputation and minimize the damages being done, whether that requires a simple cease and desist letter or escalation to legal action. We are one of the few law firms (indeed the only one of which we are aware) which routinely obtains not only judgments for past defamation, but injunctive relief which prevents defamation in the future.
We all support free speech, but false statements on the Internet do nothing to promote the “marketplace of ideas” envisioned by the drafters of the Constitution. To the contrary, as more and more false information is posted on the Internet, the attitude becomes that all information found there must be viewed with distrust, so it becomes more difficult to disseminate true and helpful information. It is for this reason that all should promote free speech while at the same time discouraging false, defamatory speech.
Every situation is unique, and requires an appropriate and rapid response. Call today at (714) 954-0700 for a free telephone consultation to discuss your situation. We offer effective and economical solutions to your Internet defamation problems.
Ralph Cindrich couldnt be more specific because of defamation of charachter and you cant prove that a bag of cash changed hands!!!!
Im waiting for my cease and desist letter from Alabama!!
Ralph Cindrich couldnt be more specific because of defamation of charachter and you cant prove that a bag of cash changed hands!!!!
Im waiting for my cease and desist letter from Alabama!!
Because the damages are presumed, it is hard for a jury to devise a uniform method of valuation. That is why a plaintiff can only obtain nominal damages at trial, thereby precluding compensatory damages absent proof of actual harm. Of course, the Plaintiff is free to seek to prove actual damages, which one would hope would be greater. However, that is often not possible.
Jail??? A fine??- maybe, anyone caring about words between fans on a website?? Only if its ALABAMA!!!!
I was talking about a "hit" of weed
Because the damages are presumed, it is hard for a jury to devise a uniform method of valuation. That is why a plaintiff can only obtain nominal damages at trial, thereby precluding compensatory damages absent proof of actual harm. Of course, the Plaintiff is free to seek to prove actual damages, which one would hope would be greater. However, that is often not possible.
Jail??? A fine??- maybe, anyone caring about words between fans on a website?? Only if its ALABAMA!!!!
I was talking about a "hit" of weed
BamaPiks,
JWheels is a piece of shit, anything about or anybody that likes Alabama football he trys to degrade.
BamaPiks,
JWheels is a piece of shit, anything about or anybody that likes Alabama football he trys to degrade.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.