Thank you Dr. Professor for sharing this system with us. So far as I can see your system stands up well to previous years.
For what its worth, I have reconstructed KP's 2010 selections for the full year. Except for a selection or 2, I got the same results as KP.
I plan to complete 2009 and 2008 in the next week or so.
I am almost done with the "presystem" for 2010, 2009 and 2008. I understand the pressure to complete this task - as we are in the middle of it now.
From what I can see there is no drop off in results of Kenpom ratings to 170. In addition, pointspreads down to 6 can be used (i.e the away team underdogs must get at least +6 points). +5.5 does does not cut it. Afterall 6, is usually 3 possessions (if these teams could hit 3's they would probably not have a Kenpom ratings so low).
Results of the "preseason" 2008, 2009, 2010 (using >=+6 points for the visitor) so far show:
>65% with a Kenpom rating of >=170 ~62% with Kenpom ratings between 148 and 169 ~58% with Kenpom ratings between 140 and 147
I have considered the "presystem" beginning 3 weeks before 2nd Saturday in February.
I am assuming the system begins the 2nd Saturday in February.
I hope this makes sense.
GL
Thank you Dr. Professor for sharing this system with us. So far as I can see your system stands up well to previous years.
For what its worth, I have reconstructed KP's 2010 selections for the full year. Except for a selection or 2, I got the same results as KP.
I plan to complete 2009 and 2008 in the next week or so.
I am almost done with the "presystem" for 2010, 2009 and 2008. I understand the pressure to complete this task - as we are in the middle of it now.
From what I can see there is no drop off in results of Kenpom ratings to 170. In addition, pointspreads down to 6 can be used (i.e the away team underdogs must get at least +6 points). +5.5 does does not cut it. Afterall 6, is usually 3 possessions (if these teams could hit 3's they would probably not have a Kenpom ratings so low).
Results of the "preseason" 2008, 2009, 2010 (using >=+6 points for the visitor) so far show:
>65% with a Kenpom rating of >=170 ~62% with Kenpom ratings between 148 and 169 ~58% with Kenpom ratings between 140 and 147
I have considered the "presystem" beginning 3 weeks before 2nd Saturday in February.
I am assuming the system begins the 2nd Saturday in February.
I hope this makes sense.
GL
Duckster and/or anyone else who can answer this question. Is there a site that you use to gather previous years point spread data? I am interested in looking at the lines for previous years regular season and NCAA Tournament. Where do you look for this information? Sorry for posting in KP's thread, so if you want to PM me that would be great.
Thank you Dr. Professor for sharing this system with us. So far as I can see your system stands up well to previous years.
For what its worth, I have reconstructed KP's 2010 selections for the full year. Except for a selection or 2, I got the same results as KP.
I plan to complete 2009 and 2008 in the next week or so.
I am almost done with the "presystem" for 2010, 2009 and 2008. I understand the pressure to complete this task - as we are in the middle of it now.
From what I can see there is no drop off in results of Kenpom ratings to 170. In addition, pointspreads down to 6 can be used (i.e the away team underdogs must get at least +6 points). +5.5 does does not cut it. Afterall 6, is usually 3 possessions (if these teams could hit 3's they would probably not have a Kenpom ratings so low).
Results of the "preseason" 2008, 2009, 2010 (using >=+6 points for the visitor) so far show:
>65% with a Kenpom rating of >=170 ~62% with Kenpom ratings between 148 and 169 ~58% with Kenpom ratings between 140 and 147
I have considered the "presystem" beginning 3 weeks before 2nd Saturday in February.
I am assuming the system begins the 2nd Saturday in February.
I hope this makes sense.
GL
Duckster and/or anyone else who can answer this question. Is there a site that you use to gather previous years point spread data? I am interested in looking at the lines for previous years regular season and NCAA Tournament. Where do you look for this information? Sorry for posting in KP's thread, so if you want to PM me that would be great.
Thank you Dr. Professor for sharing this system with us. So far as I can see your system stands up well to previous years.
For what its worth, I have reconstructed KP's 2010 selections for the full year. Except for a selection or 2, I got the same results as KP.
I plan to complete 2009 and 2008 in the next week or so.
I am almost done with the "presystem" for 2010, 2009 and 2008. I understand the pressure to complete this task - as we are in the middle of it now.
From what I can see there is no drop off in results of Kenpom ratings to 170. In addition, pointspreads down to 6 can be used (i.e the away team underdogs must get at least +6 points). +5.5 does does not cut it. Afterall 6, is usually 3 possessions (if these teams could hit 3's they would probably not have a Kenpom ratings so low).
Results of the "preseason" 2008, 2009, 2010 (using >=+6 points for the visitor) so far show:
>65% with a Kenpom rating of >=170 ~62% with Kenpom ratings between 148 and 169 ~58% with Kenpom ratings between 140 and 147
I have considered the "presystem" beginning 3 weeks before 2nd Saturday in February.
I am assuming the system begins the 2nd Saturday in February.
I hope this makes sense.
GL
All 47 system plays last year were "iffy" as well. Got turn your brain off to properly us this system
that's exactly the kind of system i like ... disengage brain and let the "Grind" begin !!!!
BOL to KineProf and the rest of the covers degenerates !!!
anna31204
All 47 system plays last year were "iffy" as well. Got turn your brain off to properly us this system
that's exactly the kind of system i like ... disengage brain and let the "Grind" begin !!!!
BOL to KineProf and the rest of the covers degenerates !!!
anna31204
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.