Maceo Jack is a problem, chances are he doesn’t shoot it as well but I’m passing on the second half
i wouldn't bet anything 2nd half. stay the course for now ride it out. Davidson is doing what they do, shooting the 3 well against a team that doesn't defend it well. George Wash had a good half but both times i've seen Davidson play this year they really played harder Defense in the 2nd half. They are going to need to do that again here tonight
i wouldn't bet anything 2nd half. stay the course for now ride it out. Davidson is doing what they do, shooting the 3 well against a team that doesn't defend it well. George Wash had a good half but both times i've seen Davidson play this year they really played harder Defense in the 2nd half. They are going to need to do that again here tonight
Scares me Davidson shootin 77% from 3 and losing. GW is not shooting as well. Cant really bet it imo.
Scares me Davidson shootin 77% from 3 and losing. GW is not shooting as well. Cant really bet it imo.
the pattern has been that we get all nervous in-game analyzing and getting discourages when the reality is that in the end more than not we wind up winning so I am confident. we should just wait and see and comment at the end
the pattern has been that we get all nervous in-game analyzing and getting discourages when the reality is that in the end more than not we wind up winning so I am confident. we should just wait and see and comment at the end
If the books wanted to make it easy for you to double down on the public team they would have set 2H line at -2.5 or -3... -4.5 is a reservedly good line for Davidson backers... no doubling down for me, but I like the 2H line
If the books wanted to make it easy for you to double down on the public team they would have set 2H line at -2.5 or -3... -4.5 is a reservedly good line for Davidson backers... no doubling down for me, but I like the 2H line
I said AS well, did not say they were not shooting well. FG % close but not 3pt %. I am meaning do you think they can continue to shoot almost 80% from 3? Didn't mean to start a giant conundrum.
I said AS well, did not say they were not shooting well. FG % close but not 3pt %. I am meaning do you think they can continue to shoot almost 80% from 3? Didn't mean to start a giant conundrum.
it’s called amateurs.... win or lose, it happens but refrain from the pointless nonsense, it doesn’t help anything
it’s called amateurs.... win or lose, it happens but refrain from the pointless nonsense, it doesn’t help anything
The plot thickens. Down at the half and there is confusion amongst the ranks about what to do. .
Very
The plot thickens. Down at the half and there is confusion amongst the ranks about what to do. .
Very
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.