Well guys occasionally you win a game you have no business winning. And that happened last night as Furman went on an 11-0 run the last 2:08 with a put back at the buzzer to beat ULM
1-0 in Postseason tourneys +$800
40-31-1 on the season +$5,340
Sorry to post late guys and a few things I had to take care of . Before I get to my play in case you want to know about the Tulsa-Michigan game someone wins by 4-5 who? IDK. My play today is:
Well guys occasionally you win a game you have no business winning. And that happened last night as Furman went on an 11-0 run the last 2:08 with a put back at the buzzer to beat ULM
1-0 in Postseason tourneys +$800
40-31-1 on the season +$5,340
Sorry to post late guys and a few things I had to take care of . Before I get to my play in case you want to know about the Tulsa-Michigan game someone wins by 4-5 who? IDK. My play today is:
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
I like the pick in ND, and don't take this as me trolling, but the fact that ND's opponent's shoot 62.4% from the line has absolutely nothing to do with this game.
I like the pick in ND, and don't take this as me trolling, but the fact that ND's opponent's shoot 62.4% from the line has absolutely nothing to do with this game.
[Quote: Originally Posted by UNC12] I like the pick in ND, and don't take this as me trolling, but the fact that ND's opponent's shoot 62.4% from the line has absolutely nothing to do with this game. [/Quote]
Agreed if anything this shows that ND may have been lucky in several wins and LUCK seems to be a bad angle to depend on JMHO
[Quote: Originally Posted by UNC12] I like the pick in ND, and don't take this as me trolling, but the fact that ND's opponent's shoot 62.4% from the line has absolutely nothing to do with this game. [/Quote]
Agreed if anything this shows that ND may have been lucky in several wins and LUCK seems to be a bad angle to depend on JMHO
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
BOL guys Your thoughts are welcome
What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
BOL guys Your thoughts are welcome
love a good home dog with incentive to play. You'll be fading the steam here but +6.5, +240ml looks juicy.
In boxing they have that phrase styles make fights and this game fits that description. UC Irvine is 25-9 16-15-1 ATS off a 77-72 loss in the Big West tournament. North Dakota is 17-15 17-11-1 ATS off a 5 point OT loss to Weber State
When you think Irvine wants your 1st thought? Mamadou Ndiaye the big 7'6 center and how they play through him. North Dakota has a player named Quinton Hooker and I've seen him play a few times. He's a rare college player that could score 40 at any given time and he scored 38 in that OT loss to Weber State
IDK how many of you know about a guy named Jon Rothstein who works for CBS but he's the Adam Schefter of college hoops. He commented on twitter "When people think of snubs they think of the NCAA tourney but Irvine won a share of the Big West title, won 25 games and didn't get an NIT berth" So instead of going to the NCAA or the NIT you're relegated to the CIT and you have to go to Grand Forks.ND to play the Hawks{They're called the Fighting Hawks now}
Irvine wants to play in the 60's and N.Dakota wants to get the score in the 75-80 range. The teams are similar in the stat column but an interesting nugget is N.Dakota's opponents shoot 62.4% from the foul line which is the worst in college hoops. I think North Dakota should've been a slight favorite and I like them to win outright as the dog
BOL guys Your thoughts are welcome
love a good home dog with incentive to play. You'll be fading the steam here but +6.5, +240ml looks juicy.
Guys i'm having issues with my internet. Why? IDK so we shall see if I have plays tomorrow because if my internet struggles to work then I can't make plays. And its a hell of a time in the sports betting year to have internet issues never sign a 2 year contract for internet
BOL guys. Say a few prayers for me as i'm very pi$$ed off
Guys i'm having issues with my internet. Why? IDK so we shall see if I have plays tomorrow because if my internet struggles to work then I can't make plays. And its a hell of a time in the sports betting year to have internet issues never sign a 2 year contract for internet
BOL guys. Say a few prayers for me as i'm very pi$$ed off
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.