Not on the game because well, I have been faded the Jets this week and it didn't work out.
The Browns are 1-22 in their last 23.
They are 5-18 ATS.
They have to win this game SU +1 for you to get paid.
What has changed?
Now you have a clearly rejuvenated Jets team coming in with a QB who will do anything and everything to beat his ex.
And the Brows are ....favorites...?
If not for a backdoor TD with 3 minutes left in the Steelers game the Browns would be 0-4 ATS this year.
Indianapolis if miles apart from this Jets team and the Brows lost to them.
Line is baffling. At a bare minimum, it's window bad window dressing of the Browns on the book's part.
If you make the Jets -1, at least you call the Browns a 'home dog' which is an attractive play to sharps and squares alike just in terms of betting monikers.
To make the Browns -1 is to say you should play the Jets! Who are clearly a step above. Or two....Or three.
So from a line reading perspective I submit you could say this is goading you to take the Browns.
But from an empirical metric-based perspective, I see no reason to take the Browns.
I'm all ears in terms of theories and if anyone is confidently taking Cleveland.
Not on the game because well, I have been faded the Jets this week and it didn't work out.
The Browns are 1-22 in their last 23.
They are 5-18 ATS.
They have to win this game SU +1 for you to get paid.
What has changed?
Now you have a clearly rejuvenated Jets team coming in with a QB who will do anything and everything to beat his ex.
And the Brows are ....favorites...?
If not for a backdoor TD with 3 minutes left in the Steelers game the Browns would be 0-4 ATS this year.
Indianapolis if miles apart from this Jets team and the Brows lost to them.
Line is baffling. At a bare minimum, it's window bad window dressing of the Browns on the book's part.
If you make the Jets -1, at least you call the Browns a 'home dog' which is an attractive play to sharps and squares alike just in terms of betting monikers.
To make the Browns -1 is to say you should play the Jets! Who are clearly a step above. Or two....Or three.
So from a line reading perspective I submit you could say this is goading you to take the Browns.
But from an empirical metric-based perspective, I see no reason to take the Browns.
I'm all ears in terms of theories and if anyone is confidently taking Cleveland.
Same people backing chargers last week will consider the browns. Due for a win, fishy line, home underdog disguised as a favorite, not yet sold on opposing team... I'm interested on everyone's take as well.
Same people backing chargers last week will consider the browns. Due for a win, fishy line, home underdog disguised as a favorite, not yet sold on opposing team... I'm interested on everyone's take as well.
most books have it as a pick'em, some have Jets +1, I personally like the Jets, they are playing well and you're right, Cleveland is awful. McCown will have a huge game.
most books have it as a pick'em, some have Jets +1, I personally like the Jets, they are playing well and you're right, Cleveland is awful. McCown will have a huge game.
I watch Redzone, so I do not watch individual games anymore. And if I did I would certainly skip betting or watching the Jets Browns game.
Now for your question, I suppose you could start with the Browns are at home and will probably win 2-4 games this season just because that is how things go. Also, how do the Jets rate as a road team. I had them at the very least in the bottom 12 overall. Usually bottom 12 teams do poor on the road.
I watch Redzone, so I do not watch individual games anymore. And if I did I would certainly skip betting or watching the Jets Browns game.
Now for your question, I suppose you could start with the Browns are at home and will probably win 2-4 games this season just because that is how things go. Also, how do the Jets rate as a road team. I had them at the very least in the bottom 12 overall. Usually bottom 12 teams do poor on the road.
Jets will overlook the Browns with the Pats on deck.
Jets have looked OK at home but not so good on the road.
This is the NFL, anything can happen.
I can 100% assure you the Jets are not looking ahead to the Pats game. That hasn't been a rivalry for a decade and if anything the Jets should be focusing on the WIN in Cleveland and slipping the next two at 1-1 instead of facing a Pats team that routinely beats them.
Jets will overlook the Browns with the Pats on deck.
Jets have looked OK at home but not so good on the road.
This is the NFL, anything can happen.
I can 100% assure you the Jets are not looking ahead to the Pats game. That hasn't been a rivalry for a decade and if anything the Jets should be focusing on the WIN in Cleveland and slipping the next two at 1-1 instead of facing a Pats team that routinely beats them.
I watch Redzone, so I do not watch individual games anymore. And if I did I would certainly skip betting or watching the Jets Browns game.
Now for your question, I suppose you could start with the Browns are at home and will probably win 2-4 games this season just because that is how things go. Also, how do the Jets rate as a road team. I had them at the very least in the bottom 12 overall. Usually bottom 12 teams do poor on the road.
What about the injury angle on either side ?
0% chance the Brows in 4 games (33% of their remaining schedule). I'd say there is a 5% chance the'd win three. And a 10% chance they win 2.
This appears to be the last winnable game on their schedule.
I watch Redzone, so I do not watch individual games anymore. And if I did I would certainly skip betting or watching the Jets Browns game.
Now for your question, I suppose you could start with the Browns are at home and will probably win 2-4 games this season just because that is how things go. Also, how do the Jets rate as a road team. I had them at the very least in the bottom 12 overall. Usually bottom 12 teams do poor on the road.
What about the injury angle on either side ?
0% chance the Brows in 4 games (33% of their remaining schedule). I'd say there is a 5% chance the'd win three. And a 10% chance they win 2.
This appears to be the last winnable game on their schedule.
I remember the Chargers losing to the Browns last year with RG III on Christmas Eve in Week 16 eliminating me from my Survivor Pool. I'm staying far away from this Toilet Bowl matchup.
I remember the Chargers losing to the Browns last year with RG III on Christmas Eve in Week 16 eliminating me from my Survivor Pool. I'm staying far away from this Toilet Bowl matchup.
You really cannot take these Jets wins very seriously. They caught the Dolphins in one of the spots of the year. Dolphins were all messed up after the Hurricane, then had to travel to LA, before going to NY to play back to back road games, while having to go to London the next week. Jets were a pretty easy pick that game. Then the very next week, the Jets were gifted another amazing spot, catching the Jaguars a week after they go to London and beat down the Ravens, a major letdown spot with terrible travel. This is a horrible spot for the Jets. And yes, you need to take the look ahead game seriously with the Patriots on tap. Don't know how and why you could possibly discount that. The Jets know they aren't good and were gifted the last two games. Browns almost beat the Steelers week 1, then had to go to Baltimore in a tough spot and did not fare well (reasonable), then had to play back to back road games, against the Colts, while falling short, and then went back home and did not get up for the Bengals game. After being beaten down last week, they have to understand that this is one of the lone spots where they can get a win. Danny Shelton should be back (Their best DT by a mile) and Myles Garrett will be making his debut. Those two blue chippers will make a huge impact on the game on Sunday and without them, they have been lost on D. The Jets are trash, fools gold. Browns get their 1st win on Sunday and I think they do it pretty easily, while majority of the bettors will be burned once again in Jets games this year. (24-10 Browns)
You really cannot take these Jets wins very seriously. They caught the Dolphins in one of the spots of the year. Dolphins were all messed up after the Hurricane, then had to travel to LA, before going to NY to play back to back road games, while having to go to London the next week. Jets were a pretty easy pick that game. Then the very next week, the Jets were gifted another amazing spot, catching the Jaguars a week after they go to London and beat down the Ravens, a major letdown spot with terrible travel. This is a horrible spot for the Jets. And yes, you need to take the look ahead game seriously with the Patriots on tap. Don't know how and why you could possibly discount that. The Jets know they aren't good and were gifted the last two games. Browns almost beat the Steelers week 1, then had to go to Baltimore in a tough spot and did not fare well (reasonable), then had to play back to back road games, against the Colts, while falling short, and then went back home and did not get up for the Bengals game. After being beaten down last week, they have to understand that this is one of the lone spots where they can get a win. Danny Shelton should be back (Their best DT by a mile) and Myles Garrett will be making his debut. Those two blue chippers will make a huge impact on the game on Sunday and without them, they have been lost on D. The Jets are trash, fools gold. Browns get their 1st win on Sunday and I think they do it pretty easily, while majority of the bettors will be burned once again in Jets games this year. (24-10 Browns)
Please don't say the Jets are looking ahead to the Pats again.
It's embarrassing on so many fronts. Thank you.
You are absolutely correct.
I would have thought that the Jets would have a terrible record in this situation (off a win with NE up next), but going back to 2008 the Jets are 5-2-1 ATS.
Of course an 8-game sample is not exactly reliably predictive.
Please don't say the Jets are looking ahead to the Pats again.
It's embarrassing on so many fronts. Thank you.
You are absolutely correct.
I would have thought that the Jets would have a terrible record in this situation (off a win with NE up next), but going back to 2008 the Jets are 5-2-1 ATS.
Of course an 8-game sample is not exactly reliably predictive.
I know it's early, but according to Scores and Odds the early action is decidedly unbalanced. The Jets have 72% of the ATS money and 82% of the ML cash.
I do NOT believe in fixes or scripts. but it will be interesting to see which way the questionable calls go.
I know it's early, but according to Scores and Odds the early action is decidedly unbalanced. The Jets have 72% of the ATS money and 82% of the ML cash.
I do NOT believe in fixes or scripts. but it will be interesting to see which way the questionable calls go.
Not on the game because well, I have been faded the Jets this week and it didn't work out.
The Browns are 1-22 in their last 23.
They are 5-18 ATS.
They have to win this game SU +1 for you to get paid.
What has changed?
Now you have a clearly rejuvenated Jets team coming in with a QB who will do anything and everything to beat his ex.
And the Brows are ....favorites...?
If not for a backdoor TD with 3 minutes left in the Steelers game the Browns would be 0-4 ATS this year.
Indianapolis if miles apart from this Jets team and the Brows lost to them.
Line is baffling. At a bare minimum, it's window bad window dressing of the Browns on the book's part.
If you make the Jets -1, at least you call the Browns a 'home dog' which is an attractive play to sharps and squares alike just in terms of betting monikers.
To make the Browns -1 is to say you should play the Jets! Who are clearly a step above. Or two....Or three.
So from a line reading perspective I submit you could say this is goading you to take the Browns.
But from an empirical metric-based perspective, I see no reason to take the Browns.
I'm all ears in terms of theories and if anyone is confidently taking Cleveland.
I got down on Jets at opening bell. no way in hades they lose this game. word up. i hope the line goes up.J E T $
Not on the game because well, I have been faded the Jets this week and it didn't work out.
The Browns are 1-22 in their last 23.
They are 5-18 ATS.
They have to win this game SU +1 for you to get paid.
What has changed?
Now you have a clearly rejuvenated Jets team coming in with a QB who will do anything and everything to beat his ex.
And the Brows are ....favorites...?
If not for a backdoor TD with 3 minutes left in the Steelers game the Browns would be 0-4 ATS this year.
Indianapolis if miles apart from this Jets team and the Brows lost to them.
Line is baffling. At a bare minimum, it's window bad window dressing of the Browns on the book's part.
If you make the Jets -1, at least you call the Browns a 'home dog' which is an attractive play to sharps and squares alike just in terms of betting monikers.
To make the Browns -1 is to say you should play the Jets! Who are clearly a step above. Or two....Or three.
So from a line reading perspective I submit you could say this is goading you to take the Browns.
But from an empirical metric-based perspective, I see no reason to take the Browns.
I'm all ears in terms of theories and if anyone is confidently taking Cleveland.
I got down on Jets at opening bell. no way in hades they lose this game. word up. i hope the line goes up.J E T $
Same people backing chargers last week will consider the browns. Due for a win, fishy line, home underdog disguised as a favorite, not yet sold on opposing team... I'm interested on everyone's take as well.
I disagree for the following reason, my best bet was Chargers over eagles, i also had Jets +150. I love Jets this week.
Same people backing chargers last week will consider the browns. Due for a win, fishy line, home underdog disguised as a favorite, not yet sold on opposing team... I'm interested on everyone's take as well.
I disagree for the following reason, my best bet was Chargers over eagles, i also had Jets +150. I love Jets this week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.