UFC TUF 18 betting: Maynard vs. Diaz so close statistically

Nov 29, 2013 |
UFC TUF 18 betting: Maynard vs. Diaz so close statistically
Nate Diaz scores plenty of punches but he lacks true KO power.
Photo By - USA Today Sports
Nate Diaz scores plenty of punches but he lacks true KO power.
Photo By - USA Today Sports
It’s a sneaky trilogy dating back to 2007. Nate Diaz first met Gray Maynard on the fifth season of The Ultimate Fighter, when Diaz won by guillotine choke to advance to the show’s finals.

In 2010, the two men met again in the Octagon for a main event matchup that resulted in a split decision win for Maynard. The win pushed Maynard into a title eliminator matchup that led to his two eventual title fights against Frankie Edgar, while Diaz spent time at welterweight, before returning to lightweight and earning a shot against Benson Henderson.

Both men failed in their lightweight title opportunities and are now coming off recent TKO losses. It’s a tough spot, but someone will get to turn things around while the other will be flung down the division ranks with another defeat.

Although Diaz first opened as a slight favorite, the market quickly pushed the line towards Maynard where it has remained. Maynard is now a -140 favorite, with Diaz now an underdog at +120.

Summary Stats:

Tale of the tape:

Physically, these two have very different builds that are worth noting. Maynard is a compact and powerful 5-foot-8 lightweight with a below-average 70-inch reach, while Diaz is a tall and lean 6-foot with a huge 76-inch reach.

MMA historically favors the longer fighters and Diaz’s long range compounded by his Southpaw stance give him some strong advantages in standup striking. In addition, Diaz is six years younger than Maynard, who is - perhaps surprisingly - now approaching the age of 35. Every one of these factors favors the underdog.
Striking matchup:

When it comes to striking offense, Diaz gets the technical advantages in accuracy and pace while Maynard has more punch-for-punch power. Diaz is very accurate with his long-range jab and when he gets opponents moving backwards, he can overwhelm them with staggering volume (as he did in his record-setting performance against Donald Cerrone).

Maynard shows slightly better defensive metrics than Diaz, but only slightly, and Maynard’s chin rating has been heading south fast in the last two years. Overall, if these guys stand and trade it will be Maynard trying to counter with power while Diaz should be able to control the cage and land the larger volume. These factors may cancel each other out in the “who will score a knockdown first” prediction, but on the score cards it favors Diaz.

The strange thing is that this scenario is basically how their second fight played out. Diaz outworked and outscored Maynard significantly in all three rounds, yet lost a split decision. The lack of definitive damage should have meant the controlling fighter would have won rounds, but in such a close fight it appears the judges were hedging a bit. It remains a rare case when judges scored against the more active fighter in a fight that stayed standing.
Grappling matchup:

On the ground is where things really diverge. Maynard has strong ground control stats and has rarely been put on his back. He attempts takedowns at a slightly higher than average pace and lands about half of them. When combined with his very strong takedown defense (he ranks ninth in the UFC all-time), he dominates on the ground with his wrestling.

Diaz, on the other hand, is perfectly content to fight off of his back. He spends most of his ground time on his back but using the position to attempt frequent submissions. The notoriously dangerous guard game of the Diaz brothers is justified with Nate alone earning seven submission stoppages in the UFC. In their last fight, Maynard didn’t even try to work any ground and pound, instead choosing to leave the fight standing. If Maynard repeats this strategy, Diaz is unlikely to get this fight to the ground.
Final analysis:

I can’t claim to know what the judges were thinking in 2010, despite being in the arena that night in Fairfax, VA. But I do see this playing out similarly to their second fight. Diaz will always have range control and aggression on his side, but the lack of power that he uses led judges to score against him in their last fight. Maynard didn’t want to fight Diaz on the ground last time, and that will likely be true again.

The line is close for good reason. These two guys stylistically cancel each other out. Maynard is susceptible to hard hitters, but that’s not Diaz. And Diaz has exposed power strikers on the ground, where Maynard won’t let this go.

In his last fight, Diaz was defeated by a more aggressive striker in Josh Thomson, so maybe Maynard will cut to the chase and try to get Diaz on the defensive. Conversely, the threshold for Maynard’s knockdown resiliency appears to be declining and maybe Diaz has enough power to wobble him. These are all reasons why this moneyline should remain close throughout fight week, and why no pick can be made with certainty.

Check out MMAOddsbreaker.com for more betting news on UFC TUF 18 and find the latest MMA odds here.

Reed Kuhn writes for MMAOddsbreaker.com and runs Fightnomics.com.
Follow him on Twitter @Fightnomics.

Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View