Long-shot NFL futures put the fear in sportsbooks

Not unlike other major sporting events, oddsmakers have a rooting interest in Sunday’s NFL conference championship games.

There is, however, a significant difference this time around. The bookies are pulling for the chalk.

It’s an unlikely circumstance. But with three relative long shots – the Arizona Cardinals, Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens – finding themselves on the door step of the Super Bowl, the books run the risk of getting burned by high-payout futures bets.

The Pittsburgh Steelers are the only team among the final four whose title-game appearance doesn't catch people off guard.

So as far as the oddsmakers are concerned, go Steelers.

“There is definitely irony here,” says Michael Perry, oddsmakers for Logans.com. “Because the same team we are rooting for in the Super Bowl, we typically would be rooting against week-in and week-out during the regular season.”

It’s also a twist of fate for the Steelers, who four years ago relished the role of underdog as the AFC’s No. 6 seed and posted road wins over Indianapolis and Denver before toppling Seattle in Super Bowl XL. Now they find themselves in an unfamiliar position atop the betting board.

Their legions of towel-waving fans just added a few extra members. Since Pittsburgh generally was considered a sound club both personnel and coaching wise, its odds to win the Super Bowl never climbed higher than 12-to-1. Thus, the oddsmakers will have limited liability if the Steelers take home their sixth Super Bowl title.

The same can’t be said of their AFC opponent, the Baltimore Ravens. Not much was expected from Baltimore with a rookie at quarterback and a rookie head coach roaming the sidelines. Although, the Ravens' opening odds of +6000 dropped quickly when bettors recognized the Ravens weren’t half bad. Perry says there still aren’t a whole lot of futures bets on the Ravens to fade.

The NFC picture is a different story. Nobody seemed to have faith in the Arizona Cardinals, who opened at +5000 and could still be had for the bargain price of +3000 even after they defeated Atlanta in their first-round playoff game. Arizona’s stunning upset of Carolina put the Cardinals in their first NFC title game and long-shot bettors on the cusp of a serious payday.

Moreover, their opponent might be the team that Perry and his colleagues fear the most. After the wildly erratic Philadelphia Eagles needed a minor miracle to even reach the playoffs, Perry set their odds at +10,000 heading into the final week of the season. Although it doesn’t look good now, Perry seems to have no regrets.

“That’s what you do in the gambling business, you take risks,” he says.

You also root like crazy for the team you need. The current Super Bowl futures at Logans have Pittsburgh at +180, followed by Philadelphia at +200, Baltimore at +450 and Arizona at +500. Perry said most of his action has been on the Cardinals and Eagles.

Last season, oddsmakers just missed their futures nirvana when New England was upset by the New York Giants. Needing the favorite to win, but not cover, is likely the same scenario they will need this year.

“We still won money on the Giants, but it was a drop in the bucket compared to what we could have,” Perry says.

Of course, the oddsmakers aren’t the only ones hoping for a Steelers triumph. There are still Pittsburgh bettors who hope to win with the house if their team can come through.

Sports bettor Jim Jensen of Sparks, Nevada, is a Pittsburgh native. He says he rarely bets with his heart but puts a future on the Steelers each season out of loyalty to his hometown team. He is looking at a ticket with +1200 odds.

“It’s about time I’m on the side the books need,” he says. “But for me, this is a coincidence more than anything.”

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by reillym32
4 years ago

When people bet at the beginning of the season, they often take a team that gives that the odds aren't to high on, but still has a respectable team. There putting the money on them just for fun, just in case. Arizona fell into that category this year. I had nothing to do with people favorite or anything like that. Its just a bet that you don't have to put much down on to win big. People even did it at the beginning of the playoffs when the were 20 to 1 to win it.
avatar

Posted by 3TB3
4 years ago

Since the Thanksgiving Day game Eagles defense has allowed 63 points(not inc. safety vs. NYG) in 6 games or 10 points per game. Arizona since the same game have given up 150 points in 6 games or 25 points per game.
avatar

Posted by Unit_G
4 years ago

profile image sicilian81 says: 01/15/09 09:31AM dont think they are that worried about the 4 people take took az to win sb!! iEND QUOTE] LMAO :-) :-D ;-) BRAVO!!!
avatar

Posted by CalBear
4 years ago

Con, I couldn't agree more. The books will cover any future bets with all the losing future bets,however, it's a matter of greed. Based on this article, they will make more on future wagers if Pitt wins it than if a team with more favorable odds does....therefor they're rooting for Pitt.
avatar

Posted by bdubble20
4 years ago

not backing the books, but going into the playoffs the cards were still 40-1 here in reno, and philly was 30-1, don't think I didn't put a small bet on both teams. big bettors i'm just guess probally hammered the books at those numbers on principal alone!
avatar

Posted by Springtop
4 years ago

Can anyone tell me what the highest odds of the year were on Balt and Ari??
avatar

Posted by Godfather16
4 years ago

bookies are always whining about something, what about all of the patriots futures bets before the season? And the Giants, Cowboys, Colts, Cahargers, all went in the tank. As for the Phil at +10,000 bet on the last week, that was a dumb bet to offer, because now we have such parity, that anything can happen, you can have 12 point dogs win outright, because there isn't much difference between teams like Oakland and TB, on some weeks.
avatar

Posted by Unit_G
4 years ago

Two things: 1 - This isn't MLB. 2 - The Cards are NOT the Phillies.
avatar

Posted by citationx2008
4 years ago

Agree with you 100% consiglieri, tired of hearing the books complaining about this, they won big last year on those futures bets when the Patriots LOST the Super Bowl- how many millions do you think were bet on the Pats in futures bets to win the super bowl at short odds last season? And i dont want to hear about how much they lost when the Giants won, there were people HAMMERING money down on the Pats not only to cover the spread, but also hundreds of thousands of dollars for the Pats on the moneyline at -400 or whatever it was. Thankfully i parlayed the Giants with Under 55, however i know many people who lost thousands of dollars on that game by taking the Pats. And what about both the Giants and Patriots this year? The Patriots opened up as the 3-1 favorite in futures betting, and the Giants at 12-1, but eventually down as low as 2-1 as the season progressed. How many MILLIONS have the books made by these two short-odds teams getting knocked out of Super Bowl contention? The books will be fine. They are complaining because they will make less money than they would LIKE to if the longshot Cardinals or Ravens win, however do not think for a second that they will LOSE money, the odds are set to induce enough action on each team for a fairly close payout no matter who wins. Just think of all the heavy dough bet on those super bowl favorites, throughout the season. And even if the books were to lose money on the futures bets, the millions handled on the Super Bowl spread/moneyline/over/under/props, etc would MORE than pay for any small amount lost. If they are concerned, then they should set a spread and over/under that will induce EVEN action on the super bowl, handling tens of millions of dollars, 10% juice on that would be pretty nice. Oh, and by the way, it's a very bad economy, many of us are out of jobs and those of us who do have jobs are likely broke anyway, nobody wants to hear about the plight of the goddamn gaming industry. Sportsbooks are in the business of accepting risk. If s*** doesn't go to their plan, that is too bad for them- they have been around for a long time and will be able to make their money back.
avatar

Posted by Rocafella
4 years ago

Arizona will be exposed when the Eagles offensive and defensive lines dominate them. Good game thanks.
avatar

Posted by consiglieri
4 years ago

I guess I need an explanation, but it seems that every year I hear books complaining about this. What about the other 31 teams, people bet on? Shouldn't those wagers cover the payouts? Don't more people bet on the better teams than the the weaker ones anyway? Also, I would think teams with bigger public followings i.e. Cowboys, Steelers would have a substantial amount bet on them? I'm sure the payouts would be huge if the Bengals won it all, but how many people really bet on the Bengals. The only angle I can think of this one is that Arizona is close to Vegas which means, perhaps, many a Cardinal had opportunity to place one of those just for fun bets on their team.
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by CalBear
4 years ago

"Con, I couldn't agree more. The books will cover any future bets with all the losing future bets,however, it's a matter of greed. Based on this article, they will make more on future wagers if Pitt wins it than if a team with more favorable odds do..."