Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
This whole thing could have been avoided by initially leaving a note on his windshield telling him not to park there. Instead you had to get cute now you both are tying up the legal system with your petty bullshit.
|
SofaKingRaw | 326 |
|
|
There was another one (that is if I'm understanding the system correctly) which didn't work out:
BAL-CLE-OAK
Week 2 Baltimore covered against Oakland
Week 3 Cleveland covered against Baltimore
Week 4 Oakland did not cover against Cleveland
Do you have to wait until at least Week 3?
|
catchm | 18 |
|
|
That photo is priceless. A tiny picture of a big red shiny drunk head
|
sup bro | 285 |
|
|
BoDogKilla said it best.....Oh my god.
speakers pumping and life was good
off the hook
when I hit the clubs
|
NoseHair | 139 |
|
|
Rooster: Another one I love but you don't see it too often -
Look to WAGER ON a home dog who lost the previous week straight up as a home favorite.
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
|
therooster | 6 |
|
|
Just dont bet more or less every time
This makes sense.
With systems and strategy teirs is no way you lose more than four in a row
This doesn't.
|
gatorb8 | 87 |
|
|
i think he meant kelly makes you bet more after you win and less after you lose.
|
foth | 35 |
|
|
replied to
My Bettting Manifesto - long winded theory on sportsgambling.....
in Systems & Strategies
glyde69:
100+ bets is nowhere near enough to judge your percentage as a handicapper as there is too much variation. after thousands of bets your percentage will come down closer and closer to 50% just as it would be more and more difficult to be below 40% no matter how hard you tried to lose. also 65% winning percentage SU in baseball is much different because of the juice. ||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
|
vanzack | 194 |
|
|
exactly
|
gatorb8 | 87 |
|
|
replied to
My Bettting Manifesto - long winded theory on sportsgambling.....
in Systems & Strategies
great thread
for years ive noticed the majority of people changing bet sizes according to their confidence in a particular play (one unit or one star vs. two units or two stars etc.), yet i never change the amount wagered from game to game. i found that this has paid off many times this NFL season as some of my more confident plays have lost and many "borderline" games have paid. had i wagered to scale of confidence i would have been down. my plays are all for 1 unit and all vig at 5%. any thoughts?
|
vanzack | 194 |
|
|
"the odds are you arent going to lose ten in a row even if you tried"
i once watched someone lose 18 straight hands of blackjack playing by the book. you dont have the money for this, and even if you did you would not waste your time with an initial "one unit" wager. if you had 51,000 dollars to fuck around with chasing your money you wouldnt be betting 100 in the first place. this system is laughable ||an_beatup.gif' border=0>
|
gatorb8 | 87 |
|
|
50 dollars
100 dollars
300 dollars
900 dollars
2700 dollars
8100 dollars... ||an_drunksick.gif' border=0>
why? ||confused.gif' border=0>
|
gatorb8 | 87 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.