Balt -3 against Car. that covered against the Browns, in turn the Brown covered against the Ravens.
Det +1 against Buf. that covered against the Vikings, in the Vikings covered against the Lions.
Balt -3 against Car. that covered against the Browns, in turn the Brown covered against the Ravens.
Det +1 against Buf. that covered against the Vikings, in the Vikings covered against the Lions.
I can't give you any stats but there has only been i believe
one loss if you wait til game 3 for this season. That loss being
Carolina this year versus NO. The system there was
NO-Car-Atl. Atl beat Car, NO beat Atl bad, Car won SU but loss at
the spread due to 85 yard moose. Mooses happen for every
system. But worked for me last year too. And last year was
my first year betting so I can't go farther than that. Last week
had the triangle system for Jax-Indy-NYJ. That hit but the other
system pushed because the line move from +3 to -3 for St. Louis.
I've never seen any system be perfect but this one will keep you on the
positive side if you think about how the public also bets with these
games. Take for example the Jax game, I think the public was
around 50-50 for this game, but should have been more like 75-25 but do
to the close win by Indy against the Jets, the books got 50-50
action. That's the ideal spot for them. Even though I
missed on my NO-Car play, NO had so much action on the money line
also. I think it was more NO trying to prove that they are the
real deal. Someone could backtrack this but when systems are
working for now you should stick with them until they prove so
right. Anyways, sorry about the long paragraph. I just like
to write alot. If you think more about these lines they help with
letdown situations, I think that's what this system is coincided
with. But anyways, good luck to you Giantsfan this
year.
I can't give you any stats but there has only been i believe
one loss if you wait til game 3 for this season. That loss being
Carolina this year versus NO. The system there was
NO-Car-Atl. Atl beat Car, NO beat Atl bad, Car won SU but loss at
the spread due to 85 yard moose. Mooses happen for every
system. But worked for me last year too. And last year was
my first year betting so I can't go farther than that. Last week
had the triangle system for Jax-Indy-NYJ. That hit but the other
system pushed because the line move from +3 to -3 for St. Louis.
I've never seen any system be perfect but this one will keep you on the
positive side if you think about how the public also bets with these
games. Take for example the Jax game, I think the public was
around 50-50 for this game, but should have been more like 75-25 but do
to the close win by Indy against the Jets, the books got 50-50
action. That's the ideal spot for them. Even though I
missed on my NO-Car play, NO had so much action on the money line
also. I think it was more NO trying to prove that they are the
real deal. Someone could backtrack this but when systems are
working for now you should stick with them until they prove so
right. Anyways, sorry about the long paragraph. I just like
to write alot. If you think more about these lines they help with
letdown situations, I think that's what this system is coincided
with. But anyways, good luck to you Giantsfan this
year.
Powerade has got it a little messed up. Your above
scenario has it to where you beat billy and billy beats johnny and then
you beat johnny. All but the last part is right. In this
scenario, you schould be able to beat johnny easily, thus the public
looks back on these two events and see that you should win the
fight. My system has Johnny winning the fight. It helps
bookies on the third game to get the public on the team to bet
against. I understand you being skeptical about it. It
doesn't work all the time but how many times have you look at a team
with a common opponent and say that that team should beat this one
easily.
I'll give an example:
Minn-Buff-Chi was a triangle system you could have seen within the last
three weeks. In which, Chi-Minn played and the line was -3 or -3
1/2 for Chicago right. 3 pushes and 3 1/2 wins ats for
Minn. So lets say we give this win to Minn b/c at no point could
you win by taking Chi unless you bought the hook. With that being
said Buff was favored the next week and won SU against Minn. So
by looking at these three teams, Buff looks like the easy cover against
Chi right. Chicago blew out Buff this past week.
I hope this helps you guys understand it better.
Another example:
Indy-NYJ-Jax
Keep in mind if you use one of the games already in the system you
can't use it again for another triangle system. So with the
example above you can not use the Chi-Minn game to add another opponent
that they both have in common. And also the system works better,
if there is at least 1 game each for the three weeks meaning that lets
say the 3 teams have games for the triangle system in three consecutive
weeks.
Hope this helps DCP and Powerade.
The logic of it makes since and you guys probably already noticed it
but it's one of those things where you say that can't be right.
But it's simple to use.
Good luck to you guys this week. I used that system you were
using last year Powerade, works pretty well. Another system I
used last year was a sportsbook system for college football. I
took all the nationally televised games and looked at sportsbook's
betting trends. If you noticed yet, the games usually go 50-50,
meaning that the public either gets the side or the total right in the
game. So I did parlays in both ways like your system, in which
one bet would be public side and public fade total, and the other would
be public fade side and public total.
Powerade has got it a little messed up. Your above
scenario has it to where you beat billy and billy beats johnny and then
you beat johnny. All but the last part is right. In this
scenario, you schould be able to beat johnny easily, thus the public
looks back on these two events and see that you should win the
fight. My system has Johnny winning the fight. It helps
bookies on the third game to get the public on the team to bet
against. I understand you being skeptical about it. It
doesn't work all the time but how many times have you look at a team
with a common opponent and say that that team should beat this one
easily.
I'll give an example:
Minn-Buff-Chi was a triangle system you could have seen within the last
three weeks. In which, Chi-Minn played and the line was -3 or -3
1/2 for Chicago right. 3 pushes and 3 1/2 wins ats for
Minn. So lets say we give this win to Minn b/c at no point could
you win by taking Chi unless you bought the hook. With that being
said Buff was favored the next week and won SU against Minn. So
by looking at these three teams, Buff looks like the easy cover against
Chi right. Chicago blew out Buff this past week.
I hope this helps you guys understand it better.
Another example:
Indy-NYJ-Jax
Keep in mind if you use one of the games already in the system you
can't use it again for another triangle system. So with the
example above you can not use the Chi-Minn game to add another opponent
that they both have in common. And also the system works better,
if there is at least 1 game each for the three weeks meaning that lets
say the 3 teams have games for the triangle system in three consecutive
weeks.
Hope this helps DCP and Powerade.
The logic of it makes since and you guys probably already noticed it
but it's one of those things where you say that can't be right.
But it's simple to use.
Good luck to you guys this week. I used that system you were
using last year Powerade, works pretty well. Another system I
used last year was a sportsbook system for college football. I
took all the nationally televised games and looked at sportsbook's
betting trends. If you noticed yet, the games usually go 50-50,
meaning that the public either gets the side or the total right in the
game. So I did parlays in both ways like your system, in which
one bet would be public side and public fade total, and the other would
be public fade side and public total.
I like to use them in succession unless the final team to
play is the one on the bye week before the game. But preferably
without it because if the team you are gonna bet on in the third week
stinks the second week, then the public will be more heavily sided
towards the other side giving you a better line.
I like to use them in succession unless the final team to
play is the one on the bye week before the game. But preferably
without it because if the team you are gonna bet on in the third week
stinks the second week, then the public will be more heavily sided
towards the other side giving you a better line.
Yea, must have overlooked it. Sorry about that
Days. Balt screwed me out of this week too. McNair in a
concussion, just my luck. But yea you absolutely got it
right. Systems not perfect but works over the long haul. I
think Balt would have covered if McNair was still in there. Can't
always predict these kind of things
though.
Yea, must have overlooked it. Sorry about that
Days. Balt screwed me out of this week too. McNair in a
concussion, just my luck. But yea you absolutely got it
right. Systems not perfect but works over the long haul. I
think Balt would have covered if McNair was still in there. Can't
always predict these kind of things
though.
Sorry didn't answer your question. I think you should
wait til week 3. Because if the second game of the triangle play
doesn't hit, then you gotta throw it out. Like Indy-Wash-Tenn,
the second game was Wash-Tenn and Tenn won SU. There's no play to
make it where Indy-Wash would have heavy betting on either side which
is the essense of this system.
I'll see if there are any games for this week, but I think it will
mostly be for the second leg of the system which is to be wary
about. If you still got questions, feel free to ask.
Sorry didn't answer your question. I think you should
wait til week 3. Because if the second game of the triangle play
doesn't hit, then you gotta throw it out. Like Indy-Wash-Tenn,
the second game was Wash-Tenn and Tenn won SU. There's no play to
make it where Indy-Wash would have heavy betting on either side which
is the essense of this system.
I'll see if there are any games for this week, but I think it will
mostly be for the second leg of the system which is to be wary
about. If you still got questions, feel free to ask.
Week 8 No third legs system plays this week for this system.
Second leg System:
Hou-beat-Jax, Now it Tenn vs. Hou.
Take Tenn and then the following week take Jax vs. Tenn
StL-SD-KC
KC-beat-S.D., Now its S.D. vs StL
Take S.D. and then the following week take StL vs. K.C. Not sure if I like this third game yet.
First Leg System:
Ideal situation for this game. No way constituting a play, but hear me
out. And it will fit into some of the other system plays.
Pitt-Oak-Den
Pitt-beats-Oakland
Den-beats-Pitt
Oak-beats-Den
Should constitute in a nice one-sided public betting on Denver with no one really like betting Oakland anymore.
Good luck all.
None of these games were in the third leg of the system. So take them
as you will. Personally I like the Jax Second Leg system because it
sets up for a nice third leg blowout which can be done when the Jags
are at home. Don't really care for the other system with K.C. K.C.
will be at home on the third leg and unless StL is being given at least
a touchdown with the hook, I don't see how I could take them.
Week 8 No third legs system plays this week for this system.
Second leg System:
Hou-beat-Jax, Now it Tenn vs. Hou.
Take Tenn and then the following week take Jax vs. Tenn
StL-SD-KC
KC-beat-S.D., Now its S.D. vs StL
Take S.D. and then the following week take StL vs. K.C. Not sure if I like this third game yet.
First Leg System:
Ideal situation for this game. No way constituting a play, but hear me
out. And it will fit into some of the other system plays.
Pitt-Oak-Den
Pitt-beats-Oakland
Den-beats-Pitt
Oak-beats-Den
Should constitute in a nice one-sided public betting on Denver with no one really like betting Oakland anymore.
Good luck all.
None of these games were in the third leg of the system. So take them
as you will. Personally I like the Jax Second Leg system because it
sets up for a nice third leg blowout which can be done when the Jags
are at home. Don't really care for the other system with K.C. K.C.
will be at home on the third leg and unless StL is being given at least
a touchdown with the hook, I don't see how I could take them.
I wouldn't advise on doing that because I just use this
system for consecutive weeks. 3 in a row. It may work but I
haven't tried it all this season. Maybe I can backtrack and see
how it worked but not sure as of yet. I'll get back to you on
that SP.
I wouldn't advise on doing that because I just use this
system for consecutive weeks. 3 in a row. It may work but I
haven't tried it all this season. Maybe I can backtrack and see
how it worked but not sure as of yet. I'll get back to you on
that SP.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.