SOME / many.....of you guys are (continuously) KILLIN' me with this:
* start over EACH week.....game by game / match-up handicapping......'previous / following' weeks don't matter stuff
IF.....Texas destroys the Terps.....SJSU looks OK but loses big...maybe game is over early....you might wanna back off laying that huge number
IF....Texas wins vs Maryland.....but maybe gets sloppy (fair possibility).....overall a weak effort......AND SJSU plays USF tough....> expends a lotta effort.........you look to HAMMER Texas > hit the OPENER...........< LH
don't forget this option.....if you kinda like USF but don't like the 20+......look for an in-game / halftime play
* SJSU scores 1st ?.....hit the 14-15
* USF shaky start.....it's close at halftime......AND SJSU is in hurry-up the whole time.......I will look to HAMMER USF 2H < make dam sure Flowers is healthy
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
SOME / many.....of you guys are (continuously) KILLIN' me with this:
* start over EACH week.....game by game / match-up handicapping......'previous / following' weeks don't matter stuff
IF.....Texas destroys the Terps.....SJSU looks OK but loses big...maybe game is over early....you might wanna back off laying that huge number
IF....Texas wins vs Maryland.....but maybe gets sloppy (fair possibility).....overall a weak effort......AND SJSU plays USF tough....> expends a lotta effort.........you look to HAMMER Texas > hit the OPENER...........< LH
don't forget this option.....if you kinda like USF but don't like the 20+......look for an in-game / halftime play
* SJSU scores 1st ?.....hit the 14-15
* USF shaky start.....it's close at halftime......AND SJSU is in hurry-up the whole time.......I will look to HAMMER USF 2H < make dam sure Flowers is healthy
Thanks BA, ya i mentioned how the one thing that could change things, is if SJSU is actually effective in running the Air Raid... Their biggest issues (not being able to run the ball, lead the nations in sacks allowed, TFL allowed, Passing Offense, and Red zone scoring) With the right coach, players, and system, the QB gets the ball out of their hand in 2.5 seconds, which doesnt allow time for USF to get pressures, or Turnovers... SJSU can easily cover the 20, or 19.5, but at the moment I feel much better about USF than SJSU.
This is a very similar week 1 game between Nevada and Northwestern -25
Thanks BA, ya i mentioned how the one thing that could change things, is if SJSU is actually effective in running the Air Raid... Their biggest issues (not being able to run the ball, lead the nations in sacks allowed, TFL allowed, Passing Offense, and Red zone scoring) With the right coach, players, and system, the QB gets the ball out of their hand in 2.5 seconds, which doesnt allow time for USF to get pressures, or Turnovers... SJSU can easily cover the 20, or 19.5, but at the moment I feel much better about USF than SJSU.
This is a very similar week 1 game between Nevada and Northwestern -25
Tempo is also a sure way to not cover if SJSU is going fast, but not picking up more than 1 first down before punting, it just leads to way more possessions for USF. I also think that the loss of Rodney Adams, and Marlon Mack, could result in a few drives that are a little bit longer, which i think could benefit USF ability to cover.
Tempo is also a sure way to not cover if SJSU is going fast, but not picking up more than 1 first down before punting, it just leads to way more possessions for USF. I also think that the loss of Rodney Adams, and Marlon Mack, could result in a few drives that are a little bit longer, which i think could benefit USF ability to cover.
Al, very nice thread, a lot of good information and view points.
I look at Art Briles first game as Baylor's coach(2008). Briles takes over a program that for years was the cellar dweller in the Big 12. Opening the year with a home game against a first time pre-season ranked Wake Forest. Baylor has a young QB named Robert Griffin.
The result was a 41-13 defeat as an +11.5pt dog.
Now we have Brennan taking over a team that averaged just a bit over 4 games won each of the last three seasons. Playing a pre season ranked team at home. Except this coaching staff has never coached in their positions before (Briles had HC experience). And I do not see a Robert Griffin on their staff.
A lot of similarities here. Can't help but think history repeats itself.
Al, very nice thread, a lot of good information and view points.
I look at Art Briles first game as Baylor's coach(2008). Briles takes over a program that for years was the cellar dweller in the Big 12. Opening the year with a home game against a first time pre-season ranked Wake Forest. Baylor has a young QB named Robert Griffin.
The result was a 41-13 defeat as an +11.5pt dog.
Now we have Brennan taking over a team that averaged just a bit over 4 games won each of the last three seasons. Playing a pre season ranked team at home. Except this coaching staff has never coached in their positions before (Briles had HC experience). And I do not see a Robert Griffin on their staff.
A lot of similarities here. Can't help but think history repeats itself.
The easiest way to lose money is to lay big points with a team with a bad defense.
If anything this seems like a good situational spot of SJSU. Obviously the Spartans aren't a very good team. USF will be traveling from Florida all the way to Cali, the bulls don't have a very good OOC record. If this line hit 21 I'll be betting SJSU.
The easiest way to lose money is to lay big points with a team with a bad defense.
If anything this seems like a good situational spot of SJSU. Obviously the Spartans aren't a very good team. USF will be traveling from Florida all the way to Cali, the bulls don't have a very good OOC record. If this line hit 21 I'll be betting SJSU.
It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now. One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts. However the favorite should be the home team. I still have a little bit of research to do, and even though i'm not in love with laying 19.5 on the road, there are just a few factors that could make this spread look extemely low. I really dont see the travel as a factor at all.
South Florida was 4-1 in Out of conference games last year, (lost @ Florida State) while SJSU was a terrible 1-3 in out of conference games (They beat Portland St). USF was 3-1 vs top 25 teams last year, while SJSU was 0-5 vs top 40 teams. The South Florida offense ranked in the top 20 in points scored in every quarter, with the numbers improving while theyre away, this offense could be a top 5 unit in the nation with the addition of some air raid concepts. I think the safer bet is probably USF TT Over. I'd take over 50.
The 2016 SJSU roster was pitiful, but because of the new HC/OC/DC and QB theyre essentially a completely different team. The Air Raid is great at hiding a lot of defeciances... The new HC came from the same coaching tree as Syracuse's Dino Babers, Mizzou Josh Huephel, TCU Sonny Cubbie, and Tulsa's Phillip Montgomery. These coaches were able to produce results in their first year bringing in the air raid. If the Spartans HC has similar success, I doubt USF covers the 20. However, Dino Babers was great at Bowling Green, but he had Matt Johnson at QB, Gehrig Deiter, and Roger Lewis at WR, and a great defense... Huephel had a highly recruited experienced QB, an elite Wr/Rb and Oline, and Phillip Montgomery had a solid QB in Dane Evans, a couple of good Wr's Atkinson, Keyarris Garrett, and Kevan Lucas... Teams with a new HC and new QB have a terrible record ATS, especially in the first 4 games of the season... SJSU had the worst rush defense, and OLine in CFB last yr. They really only deserved to beat Portland State. I understand they plan on running a very uptempo offense to score a few points, but this will probably result in miscues and Turnovers... The fast pace/agressive style only works if they're moving the ball, if they're going 3 and out and punting back to De'earnest Johnson, they wont come close to covering...
I honestly dont even love this game, but I just have very low expectations for a team that's starting a 1 star QB who had 2 tds 5 Ints and 10 sacks in limited action...If SJSU wins, their coach should be able to pick if he wants the USC, or UCLA job...
It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now. One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts. However the favorite should be the home team. I still have a little bit of research to do, and even though i'm not in love with laying 19.5 on the road, there are just a few factors that could make this spread look extemely low. I really dont see the travel as a factor at all.
South Florida was 4-1 in Out of conference games last year, (lost @ Florida State) while SJSU was a terrible 1-3 in out of conference games (They beat Portland St). USF was 3-1 vs top 25 teams last year, while SJSU was 0-5 vs top 40 teams. The South Florida offense ranked in the top 20 in points scored in every quarter, with the numbers improving while theyre away, this offense could be a top 5 unit in the nation with the addition of some air raid concepts. I think the safer bet is probably USF TT Over. I'd take over 50.
The 2016 SJSU roster was pitiful, but because of the new HC/OC/DC and QB theyre essentially a completely different team. The Air Raid is great at hiding a lot of defeciances... The new HC came from the same coaching tree as Syracuse's Dino Babers, Mizzou Josh Huephel, TCU Sonny Cubbie, and Tulsa's Phillip Montgomery. These coaches were able to produce results in their first year bringing in the air raid. If the Spartans HC has similar success, I doubt USF covers the 20. However, Dino Babers was great at Bowling Green, but he had Matt Johnson at QB, Gehrig Deiter, and Roger Lewis at WR, and a great defense... Huephel had a highly recruited experienced QB, an elite Wr/Rb and Oline, and Phillip Montgomery had a solid QB in Dane Evans, a couple of good Wr's Atkinson, Keyarris Garrett, and Kevan Lucas... Teams with a new HC and new QB have a terrible record ATS, especially in the first 4 games of the season... SJSU had the worst rush defense, and OLine in CFB last yr. They really only deserved to beat Portland State. I understand they plan on running a very uptempo offense to score a few points, but this will probably result in miscues and Turnovers... The fast pace/agressive style only works if they're moving the ball, if they're going 3 and out and punting back to De'earnest Johnson, they wont come close to covering...
I honestly dont even love this game, but I just have very low expectations for a team that's starting a 1 star QB who had 2 tds 5 Ints and 10 sacks in limited action...If SJSU wins, their coach should be able to pick if he wants the USC, or UCLA job...
Al, very nice thread, a lot of good information and view points.
I look at Art Briles first game as Baylor's coach(2008). Briles takes over a program that for years was the cellar dweller in the Big 12. Opening the year with a home game against a first time pre-season ranked Wake Forest. Baylor has a young QB named Robert Griffin.
The result was a 41-13 defeat as an +11.5pt dog.
Now we have Brennan taking over a team that averaged just a bit over 4 games won each of the last three seasons. Playing a pre season ranked team at home. Except this coaching staff has never coached in their positions before (Briles had HC experience). And I do not see a Robert Griffin on their staff.
A lot of similarities here. Can't help but think history repeats itself.
GL
If the conditions are right, a lot of Air raid Qb's can come in and change an offense relatively fast, but they typically need at least a servicable QB, the ability to run the football downhill, an athletic Guard Center, and a decent defense... It probably also helps if the coach has HC experience, and a quality staff. If they were switching to the Air Raid, I'd feel confident in saying that SJSU is one of the 10 worst teams in the country.
Al, very nice thread, a lot of good information and view points.
I look at Art Briles first game as Baylor's coach(2008). Briles takes over a program that for years was the cellar dweller in the Big 12. Opening the year with a home game against a first time pre-season ranked Wake Forest. Baylor has a young QB named Robert Griffin.
The result was a 41-13 defeat as an +11.5pt dog.
Now we have Brennan taking over a team that averaged just a bit over 4 games won each of the last three seasons. Playing a pre season ranked team at home. Except this coaching staff has never coached in their positions before (Briles had HC experience). And I do not see a Robert Griffin on their staff.
A lot of similarities here. Can't help but think history repeats itself.
GL
If the conditions are right, a lot of Air raid Qb's can come in and change an offense relatively fast, but they typically need at least a servicable QB, the ability to run the football downhill, an athletic Guard Center, and a decent defense... It probably also helps if the coach has HC experience, and a quality staff. If they were switching to the Air Raid, I'd feel confident in saying that SJSU is one of the 10 worst teams in the country.
It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now.One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts. However the favorite should be the home team. I still have a little bit of research to do, and even though i'm not in love with laying 19.5 on the road, there are just a few factors that could make this spread look extemely low. I really dont see the travel as a factor at all.
South Florida was 4-1 in Out of conference games last year, (lost @ Florida State) while SJSU was a terrible 1-3 in out of conference games (They beat Portland St). USF was 3-1 vs top 25 teams last year, while SJSU was 0-5 vs top 40 teams. The South Florida offense ranked in the top 20 in points scored in every quarter, with the numbers improving while theyre away, this offense could be a top 5 unit in the nation with the addition of some air raid concepts. I think the safer bet is probably USF TT Over. I'd take over 50.
The 2016 SJSU roster was pitiful, but because of the new HC/OC/DC and QB theyre essentially a completely different team. The Air Raid is great at hiding a lot of defeciances... The new HC came from the same coaching tree as Syracuse's Dino Babers, Mizzou Josh Huephel, TCU Sonny Cubbie, and Tulsa's Phillip Montgomery. These coaches were able to produce results in their first year bringing in the air raid. If the Spartans HC has similar success, I doubt USF covers the 20. However, Dino Babers was great at Bowling Green, but he had Matt Johnson at QB, Gehrig Deiter, and Roger Lewis at WR, and a great defense... Huephel had a highly recruited experienced QB, an elite Wr/Rb and Oline, and Phillip Montgomery had a solid QB in Dane Evans, a couple of good Wr's Atkinson, Keyarris Garrett, and Kevan Lucas... Teams with a new HC and new QB have a terrible record ATS, especially in the first 4 games of the season... SJSU had the worst rush defense, and OLine in CFB last yr. They really only deserved to beat Portland State. I understand they plan on running a very uptempo offense to score a few points, but this will probably result in miscues and Turnovers... The fast pace/agressive style only works if they're moving the ball, if they're going 3 and out and punting back to De'earnest Johnson, they wont come close to covering...
I honestly dont even love this game, but I just have very low expectations for a team that's starting a 1 star QB who had 2 tds 5 Ints and 10 sacks in limited action...If SJSU wins, their coach should be able to pick if he wants the USC, or UCLA job...
"It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now."
Well yeah there's obviously some value since the line has gone down 5 points. But then again the fact that a garbage SJSU team has so many backers for the line to move 5 points is awfully interesting...
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts"
You have any stats to back this up or is this just an arbitrary statement?
"I really dont see the travel as a factor at all."
If you don't think travel is a factor then perhaps you should not be betting. It's been well documented that East coast teams traveling to the West coast has a significant circadian disadvantage associated with travel. It's been well documented that in the last 25 years, west coast teams have been hitting 67% ats over east coast teams traveling across the country in the NFL. The same findings are true for both the nhl and the mlb, although the winning % are different. Obviously NCAAF is not the NFL,NHL, or the mlb but the same principle applies.
It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now.One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts. However the favorite should be the home team. I still have a little bit of research to do, and even though i'm not in love with laying 19.5 on the road, there are just a few factors that could make this spread look extemely low. I really dont see the travel as a factor at all.
South Florida was 4-1 in Out of conference games last year, (lost @ Florida State) while SJSU was a terrible 1-3 in out of conference games (They beat Portland St). USF was 3-1 vs top 25 teams last year, while SJSU was 0-5 vs top 40 teams. The South Florida offense ranked in the top 20 in points scored in every quarter, with the numbers improving while theyre away, this offense could be a top 5 unit in the nation with the addition of some air raid concepts. I think the safer bet is probably USF TT Over. I'd take over 50.
The 2016 SJSU roster was pitiful, but because of the new HC/OC/DC and QB theyre essentially a completely different team. The Air Raid is great at hiding a lot of defeciances... The new HC came from the same coaching tree as Syracuse's Dino Babers, Mizzou Josh Huephel, TCU Sonny Cubbie, and Tulsa's Phillip Montgomery. These coaches were able to produce results in their first year bringing in the air raid. If the Spartans HC has similar success, I doubt USF covers the 20. However, Dino Babers was great at Bowling Green, but he had Matt Johnson at QB, Gehrig Deiter, and Roger Lewis at WR, and a great defense... Huephel had a highly recruited experienced QB, an elite Wr/Rb and Oline, and Phillip Montgomery had a solid QB in Dane Evans, a couple of good Wr's Atkinson, Keyarris Garrett, and Kevan Lucas... Teams with a new HC and new QB have a terrible record ATS, especially in the first 4 games of the season... SJSU had the worst rush defense, and OLine in CFB last yr. They really only deserved to beat Portland State. I understand they plan on running a very uptempo offense to score a few points, but this will probably result in miscues and Turnovers... The fast pace/agressive style only works if they're moving the ball, if they're going 3 and out and punting back to De'earnest Johnson, they wont come close to covering...
I honestly dont even love this game, but I just have very low expectations for a team that's starting a 1 star QB who had 2 tds 5 Ints and 10 sacks in limited action...If SJSU wins, their coach should be able to pick if he wants the USC, or UCLA job...
"It opened at 25 and dropped to 20, and I think there's value now."
Well yeah there's obviously some value since the line has gone down 5 points. But then again the fact that a garbage SJSU team has so many backers for the line to move 5 points is awfully interesting...
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts"
You have any stats to back this up or is this just an arbitrary statement?
"I really dont see the travel as a factor at all."
If you don't think travel is a factor then perhaps you should not be betting. It's been well documented that East coast teams traveling to the West coast has a significant circadian disadvantage associated with travel. It's been well documented that in the last 25 years, west coast teams have been hitting 67% ats over east coast teams traveling across the country in the NFL. The same findings are true for both the nhl and the mlb, although the winning % are different. Obviously NCAAF is not the NFL,NHL, or the mlb but the same principle applies.
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
Do you mind telling me how/where you queried that stat? It's very interesting. Thanks in advanced.
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
Do you mind telling me how/where you queried that stat? It's very interesting. Thanks in advanced.
Excellent write-up and if you have to justify laying 21 you certainly have done so.
Having said that I can't lay the number for a few reasons:
1) If the USF defense struggled so much last year, do we really want them all returning?
I had that same thought. If they sucked last year on D, they very well may again. Now, they are college kids, so with a full year playing together perhaps they can improve, and are still developing too, so I can see both sides of it.
Excellent write-up and if you have to justify laying 21 you certainly have done so.
Having said that I can't lay the number for a few reasons:
1) If the USF defense struggled so much last year, do we really want them all returning?
I had that same thought. If they sucked last year on D, they very well may again. Now, they are college kids, so with a full year playing together perhaps they can improve, and are still developing too, so I can see both sides of it.
That team with the terrible defense beat Northern Illinois by 31, beat Syracuse at Syracuse by 25, beat Cincinnati at Cincinnati by 25 all last year. Against which of these three would SJSU be favored?
That team with the terrible defense beat Northern Illinois by 31, beat Syracuse at Syracuse by 25, beat Cincinnati at Cincinnati by 25 all last year. Against which of these three would SJSU be favored?
*that the D will be better / Charlie won't screw up the O.....losing RB Mack won't be too big of a deal....etc
USF D was bad sure........but how 'bout vs THIS SJSU OFFENSE?.....< that's what matters
* terrible.....much less athletic / learning a new system they are (at this point) ill-suited for..........and playing a SPEED game that USF knows well.........
*USF D fell apart last year when DC Allen left for Indiana...but has been solid before that....(no steady decline)......
*IMO.....highly unlikely they move the ball here at all
Will the SJSU D....be able to stop....or slow down the USF O? ......highly unlikely......
*SJSU D # 112 S&P......USF O # 8.....#1 most explosive O
Spartans much better week 1?.....learning a new system.....vs Flowers ?.....one of the nation's top QB's......................SURE
USF O a big drop-off?.....losing Mack / WR Adams......maybe takes some adjustment early.....but shouldn't matter much vs THIS D
Looks like (another) 50-20 type game to me......for USF
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
*that the D will be better / Charlie won't screw up the O.....losing RB Mack won't be too big of a deal....etc
USF D was bad sure........but how 'bout vs THIS SJSU OFFENSE?.....< that's what matters
* terrible.....much less athletic / learning a new system they are (at this point) ill-suited for..........and playing a SPEED game that USF knows well.........
*USF D fell apart last year when DC Allen left for Indiana...but has been solid before that....(no steady decline)......
*IMO.....highly unlikely they move the ball here at all
Will the SJSU D....be able to stop....or slow down the USF O? ......highly unlikely......
*SJSU D # 112 S&P......USF O # 8.....#1 most explosive O
Spartans much better week 1?.....learning a new system.....vs Flowers ?.....one of the nation's top QB's......................SURE
USF O a big drop-off?.....losing Mack / WR Adams......maybe takes some adjustment early.....but shouldn't matter much vs THIS D
Looks like (another) 50-20 type game to me......for USF
I'm leaning USF here, I don't think Charlie is a great coach but I do think he will bring a better defense and USF should score at will when they have the ball, the spread is huge of course but is it a big HFA for SJSU? I don't think so
I'm leaning USF here, I don't think Charlie is a great coach but I do think he will bring a better defense and USF should score at will when they have the ball, the spread is huge of course but is it a big HFA for SJSU? I don't think so
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
Thanks for pointing that out, it should have said since 2014 USF is 23-14-1 63% ATS... They're 8-6 57%ATS In out of conference play... I apologize for the mistake, but I wasnt just making up a stat to mislead the rest of the forum...
They're also 13-6 ATS 68% as favorite, with a margin of victory of 16.2
During that same time SJSU is 1-3 25% ATS in Out of conference games with avg MOV -10.2
Since 2014 SJSU is 0-7 ATS as an underdog with an avg MOV -22.3 (I'd be more than happy with a 22 pt win)
"One of the better angles for week 1-3 of CFB is to take Favorites between 21-29 pts" This is 116-94-5 (55.2%) since 2012
Several of the stats listed earlier in this thread were incorrect: For example: "Since 2014 USF is 23-14 ATS in Non Conference games" Thats way too many games. They were 8-6 with these parameters.
Just making sure we have the right numbers out there.
Thanks for pointing that out, it should have said since 2014 USF is 23-14-1 63% ATS... They're 8-6 57%ATS In out of conference play... I apologize for the mistake, but I wasnt just making up a stat to mislead the rest of the forum...
They're also 13-6 ATS 68% as favorite, with a margin of victory of 16.2
During that same time SJSU is 1-3 25% ATS in Out of conference games with avg MOV -10.2
Since 2014 SJSU is 0-7 ATS as an underdog with an avg MOV -22.3 (I'd be more than happy with a 22 pt win)
I really like that USF beat Cuse by 25 LY, because the SJSU offense is very similar to Dino Babers version of the Air Raid...
Also when I said I dont think travel matters, I meant I do not think travel will have any impact on THIS game... The fact that this is their opener, and will be played on prime time.
Here's another "arbitrary statement", it applies to the NFL; West coast teams traveling to the east coast for a 1PM kickoff, are terrible ATS, especially the Cardinals...
I really like that USF beat Cuse by 25 LY, because the SJSU offense is very similar to Dino Babers version of the Air Raid...
Also when I said I dont think travel matters, I meant I do not think travel will have any impact on THIS game... The fact that this is their opener, and will be played on prime time.
Here's another "arbitrary statement", it applies to the NFL; West coast teams traveling to the east coast for a 1PM kickoff, are terrible ATS, especially the Cardinals...
This is an in depth write up on San Jose State and South Florida 2 months before the game is even being played. We have considered returning production, coaching changes, systems, trends, and much more, and this guy comes in and says USF is poor out of conference, (which is completely wrong) when I tell him it's a good angle to take home favorites -21-29, he calls it an arbitrary statement (again he was wrong) and then tells me that maybe I shouldnt be betting because I said the travel wont matter... GTFOH
This is an in depth write up on San Jose State and South Florida 2 months before the game is even being played. We have considered returning production, coaching changes, systems, trends, and much more, and this guy comes in and says USF is poor out of conference, (which is completely wrong) when I tell him it's a good angle to take home favorites -21-29, he calls it an arbitrary statement (again he was wrong) and then tells me that maybe I shouldnt be betting because I said the travel wont matter... GTFOH
Swear I'm the only person on the under...I love it...sjsu loses their best players... so fl...gets a defensive coach...under 71 for me.. I liked under 68.... I know most disagree....but this cross country flight will take a little out of them as well... gl and awesome write up... sjsu.. bottom 5 for me...
Swear I'm the only person on the under...I love it...sjsu loses their best players... so fl...gets a defensive coach...under 71 for me.. I liked under 68.... I know most disagree....but this cross country flight will take a little out of them as well... gl and awesome write up... sjsu.. bottom 5 for me...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.