Sea doesnt have 1 wr who ranked in the top 40 in any weeks WR rankings during the year....
COlts always had a top 10 wr and hilton was top 30.....
Luck will win based on win increase, but its only cause playing a last place schedule....
No QB should ever win an award with a 54% compl %.....that is very poor
Are you kidding? Yes the colts receivers put up great numbers this year because of Luck. Thats what good qbs do, make decent players great. Also, luck has a very respectable qbr, but the numbers even mask the fact that he took on more "load" and more risk than any of the other qbs. Dont get me wrong rg3 is amazing and wilson is a stud, but look closer at rg3's passing numbers, tons of checkdowns, screens, and high percentage behind the line of scrimmage passes and with the great blocking scheme they have excelled at, they have largely inflated his passing numbers. Close call IMO, but Luck should be ROY.
Sea doesnt have 1 wr who ranked in the top 40 in any weeks WR rankings during the year....
COlts always had a top 10 wr and hilton was top 30.....
Luck will win based on win increase, but its only cause playing a last place schedule....
No QB should ever win an award with a 54% compl %.....that is very poor
Are you kidding? Yes the colts receivers put up great numbers this year because of Luck. Thats what good qbs do, make decent players great. Also, luck has a very respectable qbr, but the numbers even mask the fact that he took on more "load" and more risk than any of the other qbs. Dont get me wrong rg3 is amazing and wilson is a stud, but look closer at rg3's passing numbers, tons of checkdowns, screens, and high percentage behind the line of scrimmage passes and with the great blocking scheme they have excelled at, they have largely inflated his passing numbers. Close call IMO, but Luck should be ROY.
I would vote RG3, Wilson and Luck....Luck threw it all the time, thats why his numbers are good and bad....like I said, 54% compl is TERRIBLE for Qbs, let alone one who should win an award
I see nothing wrong with giving it to all 3, just like I believe Manning and AP should be co-MVP....
I would vote RG3, Wilson and Luck....Luck threw it all the time, thats why his numbers are good and bad....like I said, 54% compl is TERRIBLE for Qbs, let alone one who should win an award
I see nothing wrong with giving it to all 3, just like I believe Manning and AP should be co-MVP....
The AFC doesn't stink. They have the 2 best teams in the NFL.
If Andrew Luck had Sydney Rice, Rice's #'s would be like 900 and 9
Please don't argue that NE and Denver aren't the 2 best teams in the NFL. They are, and the SB odds prove it. Does that mean they will win, No, but one of those 2 teams should
The AFC doesn't stink. They have the 2 best teams in the NFL.
If Andrew Luck had Sydney Rice, Rice's #'s would be like 900 and 9
Please don't argue that NE and Denver aren't the 2 best teams in the NFL. They are, and the SB odds prove it. Does that mean they will win, No, but one of those 2 teams should
Luck also did do it with a much worse defense, Haslett's D stepped up big for RG3 despot losing Orakpo and Carriker, Seattle's D is largely the reason for their success this year. Luck did it with a D that gave up 374 yards per, on a horrendous 6 ypp.
We shouldn't focus on completion percentage alone, I mean Hasselbeck had a 63 percent completion rate.
I will though agree that all 3 candidates deserve it!
Luck also did do it with a much worse defense, Haslett's D stepped up big for RG3 despot losing Orakpo and Carriker, Seattle's D is largely the reason for their success this year. Luck did it with a D that gave up 374 yards per, on a horrendous 6 ypp.
We shouldn't focus on completion percentage alone, I mean Hasselbeck had a 63 percent completion rate.
I will though agree that all 3 candidates deserve it!
The colts had like 1 win last year, and their team has barely changed except for Luck. I have seen him make throws and plays this year no rookie ever has.
This might go down as the best rookie class in NFL history
agree with luck as ropy.
but i have martin as being clearly better than morris. i think morris is the top rookie rb in the league without question.
The colts had like 1 win last year, and their team has barely changed except for Luck. I have seen him make throws and plays this year no rookie ever has.
This might go down as the best rookie class in NFL history
agree with luck as ropy.
but i have martin as being clearly better than morris. i think morris is the top rookie rb in the league without question.
Yeah Cock. come visit the Politics forum and you'll be amazed by some of his posts/threads
Club just playin' , the uninformed were proven overwhelming
Back on topic, Great thread All three Rookie QB's had sensational initial seasons leading their respective teams to playoff berths Has to be a RECORD undoubtedly each QB was awesome. all in their own different way each of their teams have great opportunities to be very successful franchises for many seasons to come with the CORRECT handling, coaching and management
I agree with this topic, since there is not much difference in performance amongst all 3 qbs so, therefore, by default, give it to Morris just based on carrying the rock for so many carries AND more importantly yards. Morris WON the NFC East all alone by his performance vs Girlz Sunday night All RGIII had to do was handoff and watch a 6th RD pick from Fla Atlantic take his squad to the playoffs What a sight for him. Only 2 other rookie rb's ran for more, one named Eric fricken Dickerson He deserves it
More importantly, it will be easier for voters. All 3 QBs were AWESOME!! It would be truly UNFAIR to give it one over either of the other 2. They all would be slighted if one won over another, giving it to Morris is the easiest way to soothe all 3's feelings
Yeah Cock. come visit the Politics forum and you'll be amazed by some of his posts/threads
Club just playin' , the uninformed were proven overwhelming
Back on topic, Great thread All three Rookie QB's had sensational initial seasons leading their respective teams to playoff berths Has to be a RECORD undoubtedly each QB was awesome. all in their own different way each of their teams have great opportunities to be very successful franchises for many seasons to come with the CORRECT handling, coaching and management
I agree with this topic, since there is not much difference in performance amongst all 3 qbs so, therefore, by default, give it to Morris just based on carrying the rock for so many carries AND more importantly yards. Morris WON the NFC East all alone by his performance vs Girlz Sunday night All RGIII had to do was handoff and watch a 6th RD pick from Fla Atlantic take his squad to the playoffs What a sight for him. Only 2 other rookie rb's ran for more, one named Eric fricken Dickerson He deserves it
More importantly, it will be easier for voters. All 3 QBs were AWESOME!! It would be truly UNFAIR to give it one over either of the other 2. They all would be slighted if one won over another, giving it to Morris is the easiest way to soothe all 3's feelings
The AFC doesn't stink. They have the 2 best teams in the NFL.
If Andrew Luck had Sydney Rice, Rice's #'s would be like 900 and 9
Please don't argue that NE and Denver aren't the 2 best teams in the NFL. They are, and the SB odds prove it. Does that mean they will win, No, but one of those 2 teams should
Best two teams in the NFL
NE is 1-3 against the NFC this year
Check out the NFC win/loss % this year against the AFC
The AFC doesn't stink. They have the 2 best teams in the NFL.
If Andrew Luck had Sydney Rice, Rice's #'s would be like 900 and 9
Please don't argue that NE and Denver aren't the 2 best teams in the NFL. They are, and the SB odds prove it. Does that mean they will win, No, but one of those 2 teams should
Best two teams in the NFL
NE is 1-3 against the NFC this year
Check out the NFC win/loss % this year against the AFC
His numbers arent that great....yards yes, but terrible compl % and too many picks....he threw the ball all the time
The Colts have 1 or 2 good wins all year....
Wilson beat SF, Gb and NE just to name a few
Luck will probably win it based on wins from last year, but like someone said they played a last place schedule and beat bad teams
We get it, your panties are in a bunch because Luck beat your Packers and he did not need help from replacement refs.
If you knew anything about football, which you don't you would realize that Luck has to throw more than RGIii or Wilson for two reasons. 1 those other QBs play on teams who can run the ball. 2 those other QBs play on teams who have decent to great defenses. Luck didn't have the good fortune to have a top 10 running game or a great D to help him out. He won three games against playoff teams. He is the rookie of the year.
I look forward to your excuses when thePackers lose next week!
His numbers arent that great....yards yes, but terrible compl % and too many picks....he threw the ball all the time
The Colts have 1 or 2 good wins all year....
Wilson beat SF, Gb and NE just to name a few
Luck will probably win it based on wins from last year, but like someone said they played a last place schedule and beat bad teams
We get it, your panties are in a bunch because Luck beat your Packers and he did not need help from replacement refs.
If you knew anything about football, which you don't you would realize that Luck has to throw more than RGIii or Wilson for two reasons. 1 those other QBs play on teams who can run the ball. 2 those other QBs play on teams who have decent to great defenses. Luck didn't have the good fortune to have a top 10 running game or a great D to help him out. He won three games against playoff teams. He is the rookie of the year.
I look forward to your excuses when thePackers lose next week!
We get it, your panties are in a bunch because Luck beat your Packers and he did not need help from replacement refs.
If you knew anything about football, which you don't you would realize that Luck has to throw more than RGIii or Wilson for two reasons. 1 those other QBs play on teams who can run the ball. 2 those other QBs play on teams who have decent to great defenses. Luck didn't have the good fortune to have a top 10 running game or a great D to help him out. He won three games against playoff teams. He is the rookie of the year.
I look forward to your excuses when thePackers lose next week!
There he is...the troll who only comes out after a GB loss
I think Luck is a very good QB and will be great in the future....his numbers this year are not ROY worthy....
Sea also beat GB, why I am not bashing Wilson too????
Clown
54% compl % should not win a rookie of the year award when TWO other QBS have far superior numbers
We get it, your panties are in a bunch because Luck beat your Packers and he did not need help from replacement refs.
If you knew anything about football, which you don't you would realize that Luck has to throw more than RGIii or Wilson for two reasons. 1 those other QBs play on teams who can run the ball. 2 those other QBs play on teams who have decent to great defenses. Luck didn't have the good fortune to have a top 10 running game or a great D to help him out. He won three games against playoff teams. He is the rookie of the year.
I look forward to your excuses when thePackers lose next week!
There he is...the troll who only comes out after a GB loss
I think Luck is a very good QB and will be great in the future....his numbers this year are not ROY worthy....
Sea also beat GB, why I am not bashing Wilson too????
Clown
54% compl % should not win a rookie of the year award when TWO other QBS have far superior numbers
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.