not good for unlv on the road texas playing in the dallas bowl in dallas I smell a skunk sneaking around this one somebody is up to no good watch this game an see
not good for unlv on the road texas playing in the dallas bowl in dallas I smell a skunk sneaking around this one somebody is up to no good watch this game an see
I abousolutly love this site nobody understands but us .Do they know what its like to lose grocery money ,me neither thats why i listen to you guys its not to find winners its to get off losers . Thank you happy new year . I tried to tell you about under mania even lord zud endorsed what i was saying .I AM NOT THAT BRIGHT BUT been playing since 15 for real. i am 40 and love the evelution . This is the progration 1=picking games you like or teams you like unconcios incompetent.2= picking games you reserched with all your pathetic analiysis this is a concios incompetante . 3= CONCIOS COMPETANT fully understands it has nothing to do with stats or injurys only the line that was offered . FADE THE PUBLIC ALWAYS AND YOU WILL WIN YOU WILL WIN AND ALSO LOSE ,HOWEVER WINNING AT 60% IS WORTH ALL THE LOSING IN THE WORLD. YOU CAN NEVER DIVIATE FROM THIS OR IT WONT WORK . NEBRASKA +9 and the over 60 these will probably cancel each other out .However if you do this for every bowl game you will win take opposite of public on both team and over /under you will win.sorry about spelling im an idiot.
I abousolutly love this site nobody understands but us .Do they know what its like to lose grocery money ,me neither thats why i listen to you guys its not to find winners its to get off losers . Thank you happy new year . I tried to tell you about under mania even lord zud endorsed what i was saying .I AM NOT THAT BRIGHT BUT been playing since 15 for real. i am 40 and love the evelution . This is the progration 1=picking games you like or teams you like unconcios incompetent.2= picking games you reserched with all your pathetic analiysis this is a concios incompetante . 3= CONCIOS COMPETANT fully understands it has nothing to do with stats or injurys only the line that was offered . FADE THE PUBLIC ALWAYS AND YOU WILL WIN YOU WILL WIN AND ALSO LOSE ,HOWEVER WINNING AT 60% IS WORTH ALL THE LOSING IN THE WORLD. YOU CAN NEVER DIVIATE FROM THIS OR IT WONT WORK . NEBRASKA +9 and the over 60 these will probably cancel each other out .However if you do this for every bowl game you will win take opposite of public on both team and over /under you will win.sorry about spelling im an idiot.
I abousolutly love this site nobody understands but us .Do they know what its like to lose grocery money ,me neither thats why i listen to you guys its not to find winners its to get off losers . Thank you happy new year . I tried to tell you about under mania even lord zud endorsed what i was saying .I AM NOT THAT BRIGHT BUT been playing since 15 for real. i am 40 and love the evelution . This is the progration 1=picking games you like or teams you like unconcios incompetent.2= picking games you reserched with all your pathetic analiysis this is a concios incompetante . 3= CONCIOS COMPETANT fully understands it has nothing to do with stats or injurys only the line that was offered . FADE THE PUBLIC ALWAYS AND YOU WILL WIN YOU WILL WIN AND ALSO LOSE ,HOWEVER WINNING AT 60% IS WORTH ALL THE LOSING IN THE WORLD. YOU CAN NEVER DIVIATE FROM THIS OR IT WONT WORK . NEBRASKA +9 and the over 60 these will probably cancel each other out .However if you do this for every bowl game you will win take opposite of public on both team and over /under you will win.sorry about spelling im an idiot.
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
I abousolutly love this site nobody understands but us .Do they know what its like to lose grocery money ,me neither thats why i listen to you guys its not to find winners its to get off losers . Thank you happy new year . I tried to tell you about under mania even lord zud endorsed what i was saying .I AM NOT THAT BRIGHT BUT been playing since 15 for real. i am 40 and love the evelution . This is the progration 1=picking games you like or teams you like unconcios incompetent.2= picking games you reserched with all your pathetic analiysis this is a concios incompetante . 3= CONCIOS COMPETANT fully understands it has nothing to do with stats or injurys only the line that was offered . FADE THE PUBLIC ALWAYS AND YOU WILL WIN YOU WILL WIN AND ALSO LOSE ,HOWEVER WINNING AT 60% IS WORTH ALL THE LOSING IN THE WORLD. YOU CAN NEVER DIVIATE FROM THIS OR IT WONT WORK . NEBRASKA +9 and the over 60 these will probably cancel each other out .However if you do this for every bowl game you will win take opposite of public on both team and over /under you will win.sorry about spelling im an idiot.
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
Thank you weston555, and mrdonthookme get spell check please, chrome has it built in!
Been analyzing lines before the computer, fading the public will not make you the kind of money learning the trade will, bottom line.
BOLTA
Line is pretty tight here, no play for me on the side, but do like the Under, although not sure I'll bet it. College basketball earning for me right now!
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
Thank you weston555, and mrdonthookme get spell check please, chrome has it built in!
Been analyzing lines before the computer, fading the public will not make you the kind of money learning the trade will, bottom line.
BOLTA
Line is pretty tight here, no play for me on the side, but do like the Under, although not sure I'll bet it. College basketball earning for me right now!
So far this bowl season EVERY team with a run or pass defense rated in the "100's" hasn't covered(unless they played another team in the "100's)....UNLV is 112 against the run.......still like them plus 7 though....
So far this bowl season EVERY team with a run or pass defense rated in the "100's" hasn't covered(unless they played another team in the "100's)....UNLV is 112 against the run.......still like them plus 7 though....
[Quote: Originally Posted by citysnow] not good for unlv on the road texas playing in the dallas bowl in dallas I smell a skunk sneaking around this one somebody is up to no good watch this game an see
UNLV head coach has a history of pulling crap like going for a 2 point conversion to win by 20 points rather than 18 points at the end of a game when it made no sense to do that and not coincidentally cover the over by doing so. Astute gamblers see these things and when it happens repeatedly they conclude the coach is in bed with gamblers. Now I shoot down conspiracy theorists whom talk about wide spread fixes that include lots of people (that's just not possible to succeed at) but individuals, now that is possible. I don't think the head coach throws games, I think he is very conscious of spreads and totals and makes decisions at the end of game to push the game in specific directions. A lot of sharps living in Vegas won't bet on UNLV games. Now I have a scientific mind, I look to prove things by testing and reserve judgement until it has been confirmed multiple times. If you happen to watch this game, watch the UNLV coaches decisions late in the game when the final outcome of the spread and total are to be decided and see if Coach Shady doesn't make some shall we say unorthodox decisions.
[Quote: Originally Posted by citysnow] not good for unlv on the road texas playing in the dallas bowl in dallas I smell a skunk sneaking around this one somebody is up to no good watch this game an see
UNLV head coach has a history of pulling crap like going for a 2 point conversion to win by 20 points rather than 18 points at the end of a game when it made no sense to do that and not coincidentally cover the over by doing so. Astute gamblers see these things and when it happens repeatedly they conclude the coach is in bed with gamblers. Now I shoot down conspiracy theorists whom talk about wide spread fixes that include lots of people (that's just not possible to succeed at) but individuals, now that is possible. I don't think the head coach throws games, I think he is very conscious of spreads and totals and makes decisions at the end of game to push the game in specific directions. A lot of sharps living in Vegas won't bet on UNLV games. Now I have a scientific mind, I look to prove things by testing and reserve judgement until it has been confirmed multiple times. If you happen to watch this game, watch the UNLV coaches decisions late in the game when the final outcome of the spread and total are to be decided and see if Coach Shady doesn't make some shall we say unorthodox decisions.
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
This guy knows what he is talking about. If you want to grow a bankroll you have to spend years learning how to analyze a game. If you are not there yet then be honest with yourself and bet beer money just to make the game more interesting to watch. If you are good enough your bankroll grows and your normal bets (3% of your bankroll) become bigger and bigger. You only have a 2% or 3% advantage when you always bet against the public and that percentage isn't big enough to grow a bankroll. I see way too many comments that make a bet based entirely on going against the public.
Thanks for acknowledging that your spelling sucks...but yeah, if you are going to spell like a 5 year old, not many people are going to take your cute little rant seriously. Also, 60% is not accurate for betting contrary to the public. It probably hits closer to 53ish. However, if you want to win money you can't just rely on that...you have to be able to understand the spreads and why Vegas put the line at the number they did AS well as be able to analyze a game. Vegas has caught up to contrarian betting and the geniuses like you that follow that well-known angle.
This guy knows what he is talking about. If you want to grow a bankroll you have to spend years learning how to analyze a game. If you are not there yet then be honest with yourself and bet beer money just to make the game more interesting to watch. If you are good enough your bankroll grows and your normal bets (3% of your bankroll) become bigger and bigger. You only have a 2% or 3% advantage when you always bet against the public and that percentage isn't big enough to grow a bankroll. I see way too many comments that make a bet based entirely on going against the public.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.